| Literature DB >> 27435331 |
Jun Sun1, Xiao-Kui Hou2, Yu-Xin Zheng3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gene enhanced tissue engineering followed mosaicplasty in a goat model.Entities:
Keywords: Bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs); Gene transduction; Osteochondral repair; Tissue engineering
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27435331 PMCID: PMC6197169 DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc ISSN: 1017-995X Impact factor: 1.511
The methodology of the groups.
| Group | Defect position (knee) | Defect size (diameter/depth) | Graft quantity | Restorative procedure | Mosaic repair ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group Il | Left | 9 mm/3 mm | 4 | Mosaicplasty | 44.44% |
| Group Ir | Right | 9 mm/3 mm | 4 | Mosaicplasty+ gene enhanced tissue engineering | 44.44% |
| Group IIl | Left | 9 mm/3 mm | 3 | Mosaicplasty | 33.33% |
| Group IIr | Right | 9 mm/3 mm | 3 | Mosaicplasty+ gene enhanced tissue engineering | 33.33% |
| Group IIIl | Left | 9 mm/3 mm | 2 | Mosaicplasty | 22.22% |
| Group IIIr | Right | 9 mm/3 mm | 2 | Mosaicplasty+ gene enhanced tissue engineering | 22.22% |
Fig. 1Using the filling of gels of gene transduced bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in alginate followed mosaicplasty to restore the defect. A: Four cylindrical osteochondral grafts. B: Three cylindrical osteochondral grafts. C: Two cylindrical osteochondral grafts.
Histological and histochemical grading scale.
| Category | Score |
|---|---|
| Nature of the predominant tissue | |
| Cell morphology | |
| Hyaline cartilage | 4 |
| Incompletely differentiated mesenchyme | 2 |
| Fibrous tissue or bone | 0 |
| Toluidine blue staining of the matrix | |
| Normal or nearly normal | 3 |
| Moderate | 2 |
| Slight | 1 |
| None | 0 |
| Structural characteristics | |
| Surface regularity | |
| Smooth and intact | 3 |
| Superficial horizontal lamination | 2 |
| Fissure-25 to 100% of the thickness | 1 |
| Severe disruption | 0 |
| Structural integrity | |
| Normal | 2 |
| Slight disruption, including cysts | 1 |
| Severe disintegration | 0 |
| Thickness | |
| 100% of normal adjacent cartilage | 2 |
| 50–100% of normal cartilage | 1 |
| 0–50% of normal cartilage | 0 |
| Bonding to the adjacent cartilage | |
| Bonded at both ends of graft | 2 |
| Bonded at one end, or partially at both ends | 1 |
| Not bonded | 0 |
| Freedom from cellular changes of degeneration | |
| Hypocellularity | |
| Normal | 3 |
| Slight | 2 |
| Moderate | 1 |
| Severe | 0 |
| Chondrocyte clustering | |
| No clusters | 2 |
| <25% of the cells | 1 |
| 25–100% of the cells | 0 |
| Freedom form degeneration changes in adjacent cartilage | |
| Normal cellularity, no clusters, normal staining | 3 |
| Normal cellularity, mild clusters, moderate staining | 2 |
| Mild or moderate hypocellularity, slight staining | 1 |
| Severe hypocellularity, poor or no staining | 0 |
Gross findings and histological findings.
| Group | Grafts (Gross) | Border (Gross) | Gaps (Gross) | Cartilage degeneration (micro) | Newborn tissue (micro) | Surface regularity (micro) | Structural integrity (micro) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group Il | Clear and intact | Distinct | Detected | A little | Incompletely differentiated cells | Fissure | Disruption |
| Group Ir | Integrated | Indistinct | Not obvious | No | Hyaline cartilage | Smooth, intact | Normal |
| Group IIl | Dark color, rough surface | Distinct | Obvious | Obvious | Fibrous tissue | Fissure | Disruption |
| Group IIr | Clear and intact | Indistinct | Not obvious | A little | Chondrocyte proliferation | Fissure | Slight disruption |
| Group IIIl | Obvious degeneration | Distinct | Obvious | Obvious | Fibrous tissue | Disruption | Disintegration |
| Group IIIr | Dark color, rough surface | Distinct | Obvious | Obvious | Fibrous tissue | Disruption | Disintegration |
Fig. 3Histological findings of Toluidine blue 100×. A: Group Il. The cartilage and the surrounding cartilage showed the degeneration. The number of cartilage cells got a small reduction. The gap around the implanted plugs was depressed. B: Group Ir. The graft cartilage and the surrounding cartilage preserved the characteristics of the original cartilage. There were newborn cartilages in the void areas of cartilage. The mature trabecular bone structure had been formed which was difficult to distinguish with the surrounding bone tissues. There were small fissures and proliferation of clustered chondrocytes. C: Group IIl. Autologous cartilage and surrounding cartilage had obvious degeneration. Gaps were detected among the surface cartilages. Fibrous tissue proliferated. D: Group IIr. The graft cartilage and the surrounding cartilage retained the characteristics of the original cartilage. There were gaps among the restoration tissue and the graft or normal cartilage, surrounded by a cluster of chondrocyte proliferation. E: Group IIIl. Autologous cartilage and surrounding cartilage had obvious degeneration. The hollow was obvious in the gap among the surface of cartilage. Partial fibrous tissue proliferated. F: Group IIIr. The reduction of cartilage cells appeared in the autologous graft cartilage and surrounding cartilage. The gap between the cartilages was hollow. Fibrous tissue proliferated. R: Reparative tissue, N: Normal cartilage.
Fig. 4Electron microscope findings 14,500×. A: Group Ir. Collagen fibers composed the matrix arounding the chondrocytes in the reparative tissue. The fibers were in disorderly rows. Periodic cross striation could be seen. B: Group IIr. The fibers in the reparative tissue were in tight orderly rows. Periodic cross striation was obvious.
Histological scores of different groups at 24 week.
| Group | Average ± standard deviation | Group Il | Group Ir | Group IIl | Group IIr | Group IIIl | Group IIIr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P value | |||||||
| Group Il | 18.667 ± 1.506 | – | |||||
| Group Ir | 20.167 ± 1.169 | >0.05 | – | ||||
| Group IIl | 8.167 ± 0.753 | <0.05 | <0.05 | – | |||
| Group IIr | 19.833 ± 1.169 | >0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 | – | ||
| Group IIIl | 5.667 ± 1.211 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | – | |
| Group IIIr | 6.333 ± 1.633 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 | – |