Literature DB >> 27434662

Population Effect of Differences in Cholesterol Guidelines in Eastern Europe and the United States.

Jerry C Lee1, Tomasz Zdrojewski2, Michael J Pencina3, Adam Wyszomirski4, Mateusz Lachacz4, Grzegorz Opolski5, Piotr Bandosz2, Marcin Rutkowski2, Zbigniew Gaciong6, Bogdan Wyrzykowski2, Ann M Navar7.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of blood cholesterol and the current European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines differ in how they identify adults in need of statin therapy; furthermore, it is unclear how this difference translates into numbers and characteristics of patients recommended for treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS cholesterol guidelines when applied to a population-based sample. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used nationally representative data for 3055 adults aged 40 to 65 years from the 2007-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) for the United States and for 1060 adults aged 40 to 65 years from the 2011 Nadciśnięnie Tętnicze w Polsce survey for Poland. Data analysis was conducted from May 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number and characteristics of adults recommended for statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS guidelines were evaluated, and characteristics were compared between adults with discordant recommendations.
RESULTS: The 3136 US adults in NHANES (2007-2012) aged 40 to 65 years represented 100.1 million adults; after excluding the 81 patients with missing data, these population estimates translate to 97.9 million adults. Similarly, the 1060 Polish adults in NATPOL (2011) aged 40 to 65 years represent 13.5 million adults. Using weighted data, in the United States, 43.8% (95% CI, 40.9%-46.7%) of adults would be recommended for statin therapy according to ACC/AHA guidelines and 39.1% (95% CI, 36.4%-41.8%) according to ESC/EAS guidelines. In Poland, 49.9% (95% CI, 46.9%-52.9%) of adults would be recommended for statin therapy under ACC/AHA guidelines compared with 47.6% (95% CI, 44.6%-50.7%) under ESC/EAS guidelines. Among individuals without cardiovascular disease and not currently taking statins, 11.0% of US and 10.5% of Polish adults had discordant guideline recommendations. Compared with individuals recommended for statin therapy by the ESC/EAS guidelines but not the ACC/AHA guidelines, those recommended for statin therapy under the ACC/AHA guidelines only had less chronic kidney disease; however, these individuals were also more likely to smoke, have lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and have higher predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite differences in the ACC/AHA and EAS/ESC guidelines, the numbers of adults aged 40 to 65 years recommended for cholesterol-lowering therapy under each guideline were similar when applied to nationwide representative samples from both the United States and Poland. Discordant recommendations were driven by differences in the risk equations used in the 2 guidelines and different recommendations for adults with chronic kidney disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27434662      PMCID: PMC5803077          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in a European cohort.

Authors:  Maryam Kavousi; Maarten J G Leening; David Nanchen; Philip Greenland; Ian M Graham; Ewout W Steyerberg; M Arfan Ikram; Bruno H Stricker; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson; Harmon S Jordan; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  National health and nutrition examination survey: analytic guidelines, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Clifford L Johnson; Ryne Paulose-Ram; Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Sylvia M Dohrmann; Lester R Curtin
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2013-09

5.  Population and economic impact of the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines compared with European guidelines to prevent cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Julien Vaucher; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Martin Preisig; Gérard Waeber; Peter Vollenweider
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).

Authors:  Zeljko Reiner; Alberico L Catapano; Guy De Backer; Ian Graham; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Olov Wiklund; Stefan Agewall; Eduardo Alegria; M John Chapman; Paul Durrington; Serap Erdine; Julian Halcox; Richard Hobbs; John Kjekshus; Pasquale Perrone Filardi; Gabriele Riccardi; Robert F Storey; David Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Comparison of current guidelines for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: risk assessment and lipid-lowering therapy.

Authors:  Uli C Broedl; Hans-Christian Geiss; Klaus G Parhofer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project.

Authors:  R M Conroy; K Pyörälä; A P Fitzgerald; S Sans; A Menotti; G De Backer; D De Bacquer; P Ducimetière; P Jousilahti; U Keil; I Njølstad; R G Oganov; T Thomsen; H Tunstall-Pedoe; A Tverdal; H Wedel; P Whincup; L Wilhelmsen; I M Graham
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Application of new cholesterol guidelines to a population-based sample.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ann Marie Navar-Boggan; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ken Williams; Benjamin Neely; Allan D Sniderman; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prevalence and control of cardiovascular risk factors in Poland. Assumptions and objectives of the NATPOL 2011 Survey.

Authors:  Tomasz Zdrojewski; Marcin Rutkowski; Piotr Bandosz; Zbigniew Gaciong; Tadeusz Jędrzejczyk; Bogdan Solnica; Michał Pencina; Wojciech Drygas; Bogdan Wojtyniak; Tomasz Grodzicki; Jerzy Piwoński; Bogdan Wyrzykowski
Journal:  Kardiol Pol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.108

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current guidelines on prevention with a focus on dyslipidemias.

Authors:  Ian M Graham; Alberico L Catapano; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  Management of Dyslipidemias in Europe and the USA: Same Evidence, Different Conclusions? Can We Find Common Ground?

Authors:  Ian M Graham; Alberico L Catapano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Effect of Ezetimibe Monotherapy on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and on Markers of Cholesterol Synthesis and Absorption in Japanese Patients With Hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Akio Ohta; Hiroyuki Kato; Satoshi Ishii; Yoshio Nagai; Yasushi Tanaka
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-04-26

4.  Unmet need for hypercholesterolemia care in 35 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study of nationally representative surveys.

Authors:  Maja E Marcus; Cara Ebert; Pascal Geldsetzer; Michaela Theilmann; Brice Wilfried Bicaba; Glennis Andall-Brereton; Pascal Bovet; Farshad Farzadfar; Mongal Singh Gurung; Corine Houehanou; Mohammad-Reza Malekpour; Joao S Martins; Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam; Esmaeil Mohammadi; Bolormaa Norov; Sarah Quesnel-Crooks; Roy Wong-McClure; Justine I Davies; Mark A Hlatky; Rifat Atun; Till W Bärnighausen; Lindsay M Jaacks; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Sebastian Vollmer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Changes in Our Times and in Cholesterol Targets.

Authors:  Tania Leme da Rocha Martinez
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.667

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.