| Literature DB >> 27433940 |
Shan Dan1, Yuan Yuan2,3,4, Yaoshen Wang2,3,4, Chao Chen2,3,4, Changxin Gao2,3,4, Song Yu1, Yan Liu1, Wei Song1, Hongmei Zhu2,3,4, Ling Yang2,3,4, Hongmei Deng1, Yue Su1, Xin Yi2,3,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the discovery of cell-free foetal DNA in the plasma of pregnant women, many non-invasive prenatal testing assays have been developed. In the area of skeletal dysplasia diagnosis, some PCR-based non-invasive prenatal testing assays have been developed to facilitate the ultrasound diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias that are caused by de novo mutations. However, skeletal dysplasias are a group of heterogeneous genetic diseases, the PCR-based method is hard to detect multiple gene or loci simultaneously, and the diagnosis rate is highly dependent on the accuracy of the ultrasound diagnosis. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using targeted capture sequencing to detect foetal de novo pathogenic mutations responsible for skeletal dysplasia. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27433940 PMCID: PMC4959253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of the selected lethal skeletal dysplasias.
| Disease | Gene | Inheritance |
|---|---|---|
| Achondrogenesis Type IA | TRIP11 | AR |
| Achondrogenesis Type IB | SLC26A2 | AR |
| Achondrogenesis Type II or Hypochondrogenesis | COL2A1 | AD |
| Thanatophoric Dysplasia Types I and II | FGFR3 | AD |
| Short Rib-Polydactyly Syndrome Types I, IIB, and III | DYNC2H1 | AR |
| Short Rib-Polydactyly Syndrome Type IIA | NEK1 | AR |
| Fibrochondrogenesis Type I | COL11A1 | AR |
| Atelosteogenesis Types I and III | FLNB | AD |
| Atelosteogenesis Type 2 | SLC26A2 | AR |
| Perinatal Osteogenesis Imperfecta | COL1A1, COL1A2, CRTAP, LEPRE1, PPIB, BMP1 | AD, AR |
| Hypophosphatasia | ALPL | AD, AR |
Fig 1Strategy of variant interpretation.
Basic statistic of target region capture sequencing.
| Family | Sample | Reads mapped to the target region (M) | Mean depth before filtering duplicate reads | Mean depth after filtering duplicate reads | Duplication rate | >20× | Sequencing error | Mean depth of foetal specific SNV allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | foetus | 0.67 | 262.84 | 209.87 | 19.48% | 96.93% | 0.102% | - |
| mother | 0.54 | 212.57 | 174.34 | 17.43% | 98.21% | 0.104% | - | |
| father | 0.54 | 207.77 | 171.41 | 16.86% | 98.47% | 0.109% | - | |
| plasma | 2.14 | 853.01 | 141.20 | 53.42% | 95.60% | 0.059% | 14.03 | |
| Case 2 | foetus | 0.46 | 163.37 | 143.04 | 11.37% | 84.49% | 0.086% | - |
| mother | 0.73 | 285.67 | 258.55 | 8.99% | 97.66% | 0.176% | - | |
| father | 0.44 | 171.40 | 143.74 | 15.62% | 96.32% | 0.093% | - | |
| plasma | 4.67 | 1846.32 | 293.19 | 65.16% | 99.75% | 0.089% | 12.77 | |
| Case 3 | foetus | 0.54 | 214.77 | 174.32 | 17.96% | 95.28% | 0.096% | - |
| mother | 0.59 | 232.91 | 188.84 | 18.39% | 98.04% | 0.094% | - | |
| father | 0.58 | 227.14 | 174.97 | 22.17% | 97.71% | 0.093% | - | |
| plasma | 1.89 | 750.26 | 339.60 | 49.74% | 98.64% | 0.057% | 49.69 | |
| Control Case 1 | foetus | 0.88 | 346.06 | 274.15 | 19.87% | 98.37% | 0.105% | - |
| mother | 0.48 | 190.31 | 147.33 | 22.13% | 96.22% | 0.097% | - | |
| father | 0.74 | 291.73 | 226.29 | 21.95% | 97.98% | 0.090% | - | |
| plasma | 2.49 | 988.09 | 292.23 | 51.52% | 99.06% | 0.063% | 21.86 | |
| Control Case 2 | foetus | 1.05 | 417.44 | 300.27 | 25.19% | 96.14% | 0.094% | - |
| mother | 0.54 | 212.08 | 175.44 | 16.83% | 96.46% | 0.091% | - | |
| father | 0.91 | 358.33 | 268.44 | 24.54% | 98.27% | 0.091% | - | |
| plasma | 2.32 | 922.43 | 359.62 | 55.50% | 98.78% | 0.059% | 15.29 |
Performance of foetal specific base substitution detection in plasma samples.
| Case No. | Foetal conc | Number of foetal specific variants identified in fetal gDNA sample | Number of FN | Number of FP | Number of TP | TPR | PPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 2 | 6.84% | 79 | 6 | 2 | 73 | 92.41% | 97.33% |
| Control case 1 | 9.49% | 114 | 2 | 0 | 112 | 98.25% | 100.00% |
| Control case 2 | 10.37% | 114 | 2 | 0 | 112 | 98.25% | 100.00% |
| Case 1 | 20.76% | 112 | 3 | 7 | 109 | 97.32% | 93.97% |
| Case 3 | 30.56% | 105 | 0 | 1 | 105 | 100.00% | 99.06% |
Fig 2The distribution of allele frequency and allele depth of real positive foetal specific variants, false positive foetal specific variants and false negative foetal specific variants after the duplicate reads were filtered.
(A) Case 1. (B) Case 2. (C) Case 3. (D) Control case 1. (E) Control case 2. The green circle represents the allele that was shared by the foetal gDNA and plasma DNA (real positive), the black square represents the allele that was detected in foetal gDNA but was not detected in plasma DNA (false negative), and the red triangle represent the allele that was only detected in plasma DNA (false positive).
the statistic of interpretation results of SNV detected in maternal plasma.
| SNP type | numbers | foetal specific variant | maternal non-ref-hom allele | maternal heterozygous allele | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| de novo | paternal inherited non-reference allele | |||||
| case 1 | total SNV | 39 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
| Synonymous | 21 | - | 3 benign | 8 benign | 10 benign | |
| missense | 14 | 1 pathogenic | 3 benign | 6 benign | 4 benign | |
| splice±10 | 4 | - | 1 benign | 1 benign | 2 benign | |
| case 2 | total SNV | 51 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 29 |
| Synonymous | 26 | 1 benign (false) | 2 benign | 9 benign | 14 benign | |
| missense | 21 | 1 pathogenic | 1 benign | 6 benign | 10 benign; 3 VUS | |
| splice±10 | 5 | - | - | 2 benign | 2 benign | |
| case 3 | total SNV | 44 | 1 | 12 | 15 | 16 |
| Synonymous | 25 | - | 7 benign | 8 benign | 9 benign, 1VUS | |
| missense | 14 | 1 pathogenic | 3 benign | 5 benign | 4 benign; 1VUS | |
| splice±10 | 5 | - | 2 benign | 2 benign | 1 | |
| Control case 1 | total SNV | 40 | 0 | 9 | 13 | 19 |
| Synonymous | 20 | - | 5 benign | 7 benign | 8 benign | |
| missense | 16 | - | 3 benign | 4 benign | 8 benign;1VUS | |
| splice±10 | 5 | - | 1 benign | 2 benign | 1 benign; 1 VUS | |
| control case 2 | total SNV | 45 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 12 |
| Synonymous | 24 | - | 5 benign | 13 benign | 6 benign | |
| missense | 14 | - | 3 benign | 8 benign | 3 benign | |
| splice±10 | 7 | - | 2 benign | 2 benign | 3 benign | |
Fig 3Computer simulation of foetal specific variants detection in different foetal DNA concentrations and different mean sequencing depth (A) postive predict value. (B) true positve rate.