Literature DB >> 27433895

Evaluation of the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard "Adjusted Complication Rate" Measure Specifications.

Kristen A Ban1, Mark E Cohen, Clifford Y Ko, Mark W Friedberg, Jonah J Stulberg, Lynn Zhou, Bruce L Hall, David B Hoyt, Karl Y Bilimoria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard is the first nationwide, multispecialty public reporting of individual surgeon outcomes. However, ProPublica's use of a previously undescribed outcome measure (composite of in-hospital mortality or 30-day related readmission) and inclusion of only inpatients have been questioned. Our objectives were to (1) determine the proportion of cases excluded by ProPublica's specifications, (2) assess the proportion of inpatient complications excluded from ProPublica's measure, and (3) examine the validity of ProPublica's outcome measure by comparing performance on the measure to well-established postoperative outcome measures.
METHODS: Using ACS-NSQIP data (2012-2014) for 8 ProPublica procedures and for All Operations, the proportion of cases meeting all ProPublica inclusion criteria was determined. We assessed the proportion of complications occurring inpatient, and thus not considered by ProPublica's measure. Finally, we compared risk-adjusted performance based on ProPublica's measure specifications to established ACS-NSQIP outcome measure performance (eg, death/serious morbidity, mortality).
RESULTS: ProPublica's inclusion criteria resulted in elimination of 82% of all operations from assessment (range: 42% for total knee arthroplasty to 96% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy). For all ProPublica operations combined, 84% of complications occur during inpatient hospitalization (range: 61% for TURP to 88% for total hip arthroplasty), and are thus missed by the ProPublica measure. Hospital-level performance on the ProPublica measure correlated weakly with established complication measures, but correlated strongly with readmission (R = 0.834, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ProPublica's outcome measure specifications exclude 82% of cases, miss 84% of postoperative complications, and correlate poorly with well-established postoperative outcomes. Thus, the validity of the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard is questionable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27433895     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  3 in total

Review 1.  Public reporting and transparency: a primer on public outcomes reporting.

Authors:  John R Romanelli; Pascal R Fuchshuber; Jonah James Stulberg; Rebecca Brewer Kowalski; Prashant Sinha; Thomas A Aloia; Rocco Orlando
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Finn; Jason K Tong; Hannah E Alexander; Chris Wirtalla; Heather Wachtel; Carmen E Guerra; Shivan J Mehta; Richard Wender; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 3.  Healthcare systems approach to patient reported outcomes-benefits and challenges in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Susan D Moffatt-Bruce
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.