Literature DB >> 27433245

The ScanTrainer obstetrics and gynaecology ultrasound virtual reality training simulator: A cost model to determine the cost viability of replacing clinical training with simulation training.

G Carolan-Rees1, A F Ray2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to produce an economic cost model comparing the use of the Medaphor ScanTrainer virtual reality training simulator for obstetrics and gynaecology ultrasound to achieve basic competence, with the traditional training method. A literature search and survey of expert opinion were used to identify resources used in training. An executable model was produced in Excel. The model showed a cost saving for a clinic using the ScanTrainer of £7114 per annum. The uncertainties of the model were explored and it was found to be robust. Threshold values for the key drivers of the model were identified. Using the ScanTrainer is cost saving for clinics with at least two trainees per year to train, if it would take at least six lists to train them using the traditional training method and if a traditional training list has at least two fewer patients than a standard list.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasound training; cost model; virtual reality

Year:  2015        PMID: 27433245      PMCID: PMC4760578          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X14567498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of performance measures and learning curves for use of a virtual-reality ultrasound simulator in transvaginal ultrasound examination.

Authors:  M E Madsen; L Konge; L N Nørgaard; A Tabor; C Ringsted; A K Klemmensen; B Ottesen; M G Tolsgaard
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  A proposed new clinical assessment framework for diagnostic medical ultrasound students.

Authors:  Vivien Gibbs
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-02

3.  Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach.

Authors:  Sara Khangura; Kristin Konnyu; Rob Cushman; Jeremy Grimshaw; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-10
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Costing the impact of interventions during pregnancy in the UK: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Sophie Relph; Louisa Delaney; Alexandra Melaugh; Matias C Vieira; Jane Sandall; Asma Khalil; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Andy Healey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.