Literature DB >> 27433244

Can interactive educational technologies support the link between ultrasound theory and practice via feedback mechanisms?

Diane Dickson1.   

Abstract

Linking theory to practice is an area of concern for ultrasound students, clinical mentors and academic staff. The link between theory and practice requires a robust clinical mentorship scheme in addition to careful curricula design considerations to improve student outcomes. The introduction of interactive technology in education provides ripe opportunity to improve feedback to students to support the link between theory and practice. A series of three interactive learning and teaching activities were designed and delivered to a PostGraduate Ultrasound cohort, after which, evaluation was performed to answer the research question: Which interactive technologies support the link between theory and practice through improved feedback mechanisms? An action research methodology was adopted involving an enquiry based literature review, planning, design and action process. Data were collected following action of three interactive teaching and learning sessions within the Medical Ultrasound cohort of 2013/2014 at Glasgow Caledonian University via a paper based questionnaire. A 100% response rate was achieved (n = 14). All three interactive learning and teaching sessions were considered with 100% highest point agreement to support the link between ultrasound theory and practice via feedback. Students found all three designed and facilitated sessions valuable and relevant to their learning, which in turn provided positive experiences which were perceived to support the link between theory and practice through feedback. These activities can be considered valuable in Postgraduate Ultrasound education.

Keywords:  Smartboard; Ultrasound; clickers; education; simulation

Year:  2014        PMID: 27433244      PMCID: PMC4760577          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X14565504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  14 in total

Review 1.  Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  Lecturer practitioners in UK nursing and midwifery: what is the evidence? A systematic review of the research literature.

Authors:  Graham R Williamson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula.

Authors:  Amy F Brandon; Anita C All
Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

4.  Simulated clinical experience: nursing students' perceptions and the educators' role.

Authors:  Anne M Schoening; Barbara J Sittner; Martha J Todd
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.082

Review 5.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.

Authors:  Jane E Caldwell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  The use of simulation as a teaching and learning approach to support practice learning.

Authors:  Cyril Murray; Maria J Grant; Michelle L Howarth; Jacqueline Leigh
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.281

Review 7.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  K Gurusamy; R Aggarwal; L Palanivelu; B R Davidson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Learning best together: social constructivism and global partnerships in medical education.

Authors:  Jane Philpott; Helen Batty
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 9.  Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Anthony J Levinson; Sarah Garside; Denise M Dupras; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Learning echocardiography- what are the challenges and what may favour learning? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Anna Dieden; Elisabeth Carlson; Petri Gudmundsson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.