Literature DB >> 27433194

What makes a good ultrasound report?

Hazel Edwards1, Jane Smith2, Michael Weston2.   

Abstract

It is essential for the management of the patient that ultrasound practitioners produce reports based on their examinations that are accurate and clear. Ideally, all reports should attempt to answer the original clinical question. This seems a simple requirement and yet it is not always as easy as it sounds. In this paper, we explore the importance of the report, reasons that give rise to poor report writing and suggest educational resources that are available to improve poor report writing. Common mistakes and language ambiguity are discussed. Finally, we suggest a simple five-point framework, which practitioners may find useful when constructing ultrasound reports.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Language; audit; communication; medicolegal; research

Year:  2013        PMID: 27433194      PMCID: PMC4760516          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X13515216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  9 in total

1.  Language of the radiology report: primer for residents and wayward radiologists.

Authors:  F M Hall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Style guidelines for radiology reporting: a manner of speaking.

Authors:  Fergus V Coakley; Laura Liberman; David M Panicek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective.

Authors:  F M Grieve; A A Plumb; S H Khan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Do the terms "proximal" and "distal" cause confusion amongst radiologists and other clinicians?

Authors:  C J Skillicorn
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports.

Authors:  A A O Plumb; F M Grieve; S H Khan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports.

Authors:  Robert Lee; Mervyn D Cohen; Greg S Jennings
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Use of the term "superficial femoral vein" in ultrasound.

Authors:  Ramya Thiagarajah; Nanda Venkatanarasimha; Simon Freeman
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.910

8.  The superficial femoral vein. A potentially lethal misnomer.

Authors:  W P Bundens; J J Bergan; N A Halasz; J Murray; M Drehobl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR).

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-02-06
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Identifying diagnosis evidence of cardiogenic stroke from Chinese echocardiograph reports.

Authors:  Lu Qin; Xiaowei Xu; Lingling Ding; Zixiao Li; Jiao Li
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.