Literature DB >> 19264183

Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports.

A A O Plumb1, F M Grieve, S H Khan.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine hospital consultants' preferences for the format and content of radiology reports.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine questionnaires were sent to consultant staff with responsibility for requesting ultrasound examinations. The participants were invited to rank a variety of hypothetical reports in order of preference. They were also asked whether they felt other commonly included features of a radiology report were of value. Rank data were analysed by the Friedman statistic, Fisher's multiple comparisons least significant difference test, and the Kemeny-Young method.
RESULTS: Forty-nine responses were received. There was a preference for more detailed reports that included a clinical comment by the radiologist, for both normal and abnormal results (p<0.05). Reports presented in tables were preferred. The combination of a detailed tabular report with a radiologist's comment was the most popular single structure, preferred by 43% of respondents for normal reports and 51% for abnormal reports.
CONCLUSION: Detailed reports with a radiologists' comment are preferred to briefer reports, even for normal examinations. Tabular reports are preferred to prose, with the combination of a detailed report presented in a tabular format accompanied by a radiologist's comment being the most preferred style.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19264183     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  39 in total

1.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Influence of radiology report format on reading time and comprehension.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; E Tyler Hall; Stacy Jaw; Bruce Reiner; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Facing the future: the effects of the impending financial drought on NHS finances and how UK radiology services can contribute to expected efficiency savings.

Authors:  L Grant; J Appleby; N Griffin; A Adam; P Gishen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Structured reporting using a shared indexed multilingual radiology lexicon.

Authors:  Roberto Stramare; Giuliano Scattolin; Valeria Beltrame; Marco Gerardi; Marco Sommavilla; Cristina Gatto; Paolo Mosca; Leopoldo Rubaltelli; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  The role of key image notes in CT imaging study interpretation.

Authors:  Shu-Feng Fan; Zhe Xu; Hai-Qing He; Jian-Rong Ding; Gao-Jun Teng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Style and content of CT and MR imaging lumbar spine reports: radiologist and clinician preferences.

Authors:  M Ghali Eskander; A Leung; D Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective.

Authors:  F M Grieve; A A Plumb; S H Khan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Is there an association between radiologist turnaround time of emergency department abdominal CT studies and radiologic report quality?

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; John A Bonavita; Mark P Foran; Brent W Matza; John M McMenamy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03

9.  An electronic tool for systematic reporting of fractures on skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse: prototype development and physician feedback.

Authors:  Ignasi Barber; Sarah D Bixby; Nicole B Morris; Patricia L Kleinman; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Patricia T Chang; Paul K Kleinman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Structured reporting in petrous bone MRI examinations: impact on report completeness and quality.

Authors:  Marco Armbruster; Sebastian Gassenmaier; Mareike Haack; Maximilian Reiter; Dominik Nörenberg; Thomas Henzler; Nora N Sommer; Wieland H Sommer; Franziska Braun
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.