Martin Holderried1,2, Rebecca Hummel2, Claudius Falch3, Andreas Kirschniak3, Alfred Koenigsrainer3, Christian Ernst2, Sven Muller4,5. 1. Department of Quality Management, Medical and Business Development, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany. 2. Division of Economics and Management of Social Services, within the Institute of Health Care and Public Management, Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany. 3. Clinic for Visceral, General and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhörnlestrasse 22, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. 4. Clinic for Visceral, General and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhörnlestrasse 22, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. sven.mueller@med.uni-tuebingen.de. 5. Division of Economics and Management of Social Services, within the Institute of Health Care and Public Management, Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany. sven.mueller@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways aim to standardize perioperative and postoperative care of surgical procedures and are shown to result in a significant optimization associated with cost reduction. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of two different implementations forms of clinical pathways on the pathway compliance and resulting costs. METHODS: Data of patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were collected over two different periods: using a clinical pathway in the form of a paper-based checklist, or a clinical pathway integrated into the paper-based medical treatment and nursing documentation. Outcome measures were compliance of the clinical pathway and total costs per case. RESULTS: The compliance was significantly higher using integrated pathways compared to paper-based checklists (n = 117 of 123, 95 % vs 54 of 118, 46 %; p < 0.001). Mean total costs (€2206 vs €2458, p = 0.027) and length of hospital stay (2.13 vs 2.77 days, p < 0.001) were significantly reduced by the integrated clinical pathway compared to checklists. Further, the variation of costs per case and variation of length of hospital stay were significantly smaller with integrated clinical pathway (±€440 vs ±€538, p = 0.039 and ±0.53 vs ±0.68 days, p < 0.001, respectively). No difference regarding postoperative complication was observed (n = 3 vs. 4 events; p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Integrated clinical pathways display a significant higher compliance compared to checklists resulting in reduced total costs, shorter hospital stay and a smaller variation of cost, making it a useful tool in process controlling and planning.
BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways aim to standardize perioperative and postoperative care of surgical procedures and are shown to result in a significant optimization associated with cost reduction. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of two different implementations forms of clinical pathways on the pathway compliance and resulting costs. METHODS: Data of patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were collected over two different periods: using a clinical pathway in the form of a paper-based checklist, or a clinical pathway integrated into the paper-based medical treatment and nursing documentation. Outcome measures were compliance of the clinical pathway and total costs per case. RESULTS: The compliance was significantly higher using integrated pathways compared to paper-based checklists (n = 117 of 123, 95 % vs 54 of 118, 46 %; p < 0.001). Mean total costs (€2206 vs €2458, p = 0.027) and length of hospital stay (2.13 vs 2.77 days, p < 0.001) were significantly reduced by the integrated clinical pathway compared to checklists. Further, the variation of costs per case and variation of length of hospital stay were significantly smaller with integrated clinical pathway (±€440 vs ±€538, p = 0.039 and ±0.53 vs ±0.68 days, p < 0.001, respectively). No difference regarding postoperative complication was observed (n = 3 vs. 4 events; p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Integrated clinical pathways display a significant higher compliance compared to checklists resulting in reduced total costs, shorter hospital stay and a smaller variation of cost, making it a useful tool in process controlling and planning.
Authors: Markus K Müller; Konstantin J Dedes; Daniel Dindo; Stefan Steiner; Dieter Hahnloser; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Sven Muller; Marco P Zalunardo; Martin Hubner; Pierre A Clavien; Nicolas Demartines Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: J A Hannam; L Glass; J Kwon; J Windsor; F Stapelberg; K Callaghan; A F Merry; S J Mitchell Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: W A van Klei; R G Hoff; E E H L van Aarnhem; R K J Simmermacher; L P E Regli; T H Kappen; L van Wolfswinkel; C J Kalkman; W F Buhre; L M Peelen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 12.969