| Literature DB >> 27430314 |
Yulian Zhang1, Zhongliang Zhou2, Jianmin Gao3, Dan Wang4, Qian Zhang4, Zhiying Zhou1, Min Su5, Dan Li5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is an important public health issue in China, but there are few studies on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with hypertension in China. This study aims to examine the HRQoL as measured by EQ-5D and investigate the factors that influence HRQoL for patients with hypertension in Shaanxi Province, China.Entities:
Keywords: EQ-5D; HRQoL; Hypertension; Tobit regression model
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27430314 PMCID: PMC4950775 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1536-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
The Chinese utility values for EQ-5D health states
| C | MO2 | MO3 | SC2 | SC3 | UA2 | UA3 | PD2 | PD3 | AD2 | AD3 | N3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.039 | 0.099 | 0.246 | 0.105 | 0.208 | 0.074 | 0.193 | 0.092 | 0.236 | 0.086 | 0.205 | 0.022 |
Distribution of the EQ-5D self-classified health states of the urban and rural population with hypertension in Shaanxi Province, China
| Urban hypertensive population (%) | Rural hypertensive population (%) |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No problem | Moderate problem | Extreme problem | No problem | Moderate problem | Extreme problem | ||
| Mobility | 81.72 | 16.25 | 2.02 | 79.27 | 18.55 | 2.18 | 0.049 |
| Self-care | 88.57 | 8.79 | 2.64 | 87.50 | 9.92 | 2.58 | 0.331 |
| Usual activities | 84.94 | 11.47 | 3.59 | 81.40 | 14.03 | 4.57 | 0.002 |
| Pain/discomfort | 71.03 | 26.70 | 2.27 | 64.65 | 32.61 | 2.74 | <0.001 |
| Anxiety/depression | 86.37 | 12.02 | 1.61 | 81.29 | 17.45 | 1.26 | <0.001 |
* Chi-square test was employed to test the difference in constituent ratio in each dimension of EQ-5D between the urban and rural groups. Missing data: the numbers of respondents with missing data are 0, 1, 0, 1, 3 in urban area and 2, 1, 1, 1, 1 in rural area for the variables of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression are respectively
Utility scores of EQ-5D and its each dimension of the urban and rural groups
| Dimensions | Urban group (95 % CI) | Rural group (95 % CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Mobility | −0.021 (−0.023, −0.019) | −0.025(−0.025, −0.022) |
| Self-care | −0.015(−0.016, −0.013) | −0.016(−0.017, −0.014) |
| Usual activities | −0.015(−0.017, −0.014) | −0.019(−0.021, −0.018) |
| Pain/discomfort | −0.030(−0.032, −0.028) | −0.037(−0.038, −0.035) |
| Anxiety/depression | −0.014(−0.015, −0.012) | −0.018(−0.019, −0.016) |
| EQ-5D utility | 0.891(0.883, 0.899) | 0.870(0.863, 0.876) |
Univariate analysis of the EQ-5D utility scores and categorical variables
| Urban group | Rural group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD |
| |
| Gender | <0.001 | |||||
| Male | 0.906 | 0.181 | <0.001 | 0.887 | 0.192 | |
| Female | 0.878 | 0.214 | 0.858 | 0.218 | ||
| Age Group | ||||||
| 35–44 | 0.959 | 0.120 | 0.946 | .118 | ||
| 45–54 | 0.948 | 0.130 | <0.001 | 0.929 | 0.143 | <0.001 |
| 55–64 | 0.917 | 0.169 | 0.893 | 0.183 | ||
| ≥ 65 | 0.845 | 0.233 | 0.803 | 0.250 | ||
| Ethnic group Han | 0.890 | 0.201 | 0.670 | 0.870 | 0.207 | 0.463 |
| Others | 0.910 | 0.251 | 0.832 | 0.232 | ||
| Region | ||||||
| Shannan | 0.875 | 0.207 | <0.001 | 0.879 | 0.197 | 0.015 |
| Guanzhong | 0.899 | 0.214 | 0.869 | 0.210 | ||
| Shanbei | 0.878 | 0.195 | 0.850 | 0.215 | ||
| Marital status | <0.001 | |||||
| Married | 0.908 | 0.184 | 0.887 | 0.196 | <0.001 | |
| Single | 0.915 | 0.174 | 0.846 | 0.216 | ||
| Divorced | 0.797 | 0.257 | 0.795 | 0.243 | ||
| Widowed | 0.886 | 0.149 | 0.980 | 0.600 | ||
| Education level | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Illiterate | 0.797 | 0.263 | 0.815 | 0.241 | ||
| Primary school | 0.874 | 0.202 | 0.877 | 0.201 | ||
| Junior high school | 0.919 | 0.174 | 0.921 | 0.155 | ||
| Senior high / technical school | 0.928 | 0.162 | 0.922 | 0.163 | ||
| College and above | 0.948 | 0.123 | 0.995 | 0.026 | ||
| Employment status | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Employed | 0.937 | 0.132 | 0.905 | 0.169 | ||
| Retired | 0.890 | 0.205 | 0.863 | 0.217 | ||
| Unemployed | 0.823 | 0.251 | 0.778 | 0.265 | ||
| Insurance coverage | ||||||
| Uninsured | 0.890 | 0.201 | 0.071 | 0.833 | 0.174 | 0.175 |
| Insured | 0.931 | 0.177 | 0.870 | 0.209 | ||
| Smoking status | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Yes | 0.882 | 0.210 | 0.860 | 0.219 | ||
| No | 0.923 | 0.153 | 0.900 | 0.167 | ||
| Drinking status | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Yes | 0.880 | 0.209 | 0.863 | 0.214 | ||
| No | 0.947 | 0.124 | 0.930 | 0.140 | ||
| Physical activity | <0.001 | |||||
| Yes | 0.929 | 0.139 | 0.892 | 0.170 | 0.078 | |
| No | 0.854 | 0.239 | 0.865 | 0.216 | ||
| Health education | ||||||
| Yes | 0.891 | 0.192 | 0.123 | 0.871 | 0.207 | 0.107 |
| No | 0.890 | 0.215 | 0.858 | 0.218 | ||
| Health examination | ||||||
| Yes | 0.899 | 0.175 | 0.924 | 0.870 | 0.200 | 0.275 |
| No | 0.889 | 0.231 | 0.869 | 0.213 | ||
* ANOVA was employed to test the difference in EQ-5D utility scores at different levels of each variable. Missing data for the variables: marital status (urban/rural: 1/2), employment status (urban/rural: 5/0), insurance coverage (urban/rural: 8/2), smoking status (urban/rural: 2/0), drinking status (urban/rural: 24/35), physical activity (urban/rural: 17/12), health education (urban/rural: 0/4) and health examination (urban/rural: 1/8)
Description of independent variables
| Variables | Urban and rural | Urban group | Rural group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Area | |||
| Urban | 2,424 (39.5) | — | — |
| Rurala | 3,721 (60.5) | — | — |
| Ln of expenditure (RMB) | 8.60 ± 0.79 | 8.86 ± 0.74 | 8.44 ± 0.78 |
| Gender | |||
| Malea | 2,629 (42.8) | 1,124 (46.4) | 1,505 (40.5) |
| Female | 3,516 (57.2) | 1,300 (53.6) | 2,216 (59.5) |
| Age Group(years) | |||
| 15–44a | 410 (6.7) | 155 (6.4) | 255 (6.8) |
| 45–54 | 1,218 (19.8) | 415 (17.1) | 803 (21.6) |
| 55–64 | 1,918 (31.2) | 694 (28.6) | 1,124 (32.9) |
| ≥ 65 | 2,599 (42.3) | 1,160 (47.9) | 1,439 (38.7) |
| Ethnic group | |||
| Hana | 6,043 (98.3) | 2,403 (99.1) | 3,640 (97.8) |
| Others | 102 (1.7) | 21 (0.9) | 81 (2.2) |
| Region | |||
| Shannana | 1,980 (32.2) | 601 (24.8) | 1379 (37.1) |
| Guanzhong | 3,328 (54.2) | 1535 (63.3) | 1793 (48.2) |
| Shanbei | 837 (13.6) | 288 (11.9) | 549 (14.7) |
| Marital status | |||
| Marrieda | 4,946 (80.5) | 2,004 (82.7) | 2,942 (79.1) |
| Single | 96 (1.6) | 23 (0.9) | 73 (1.9) |
| Divorced | 1,059 (17.2) | 372 (15.4) | 687 (18.5) |
| Widowed | 41 (0.7) | 24 (1.0) | 17 (0.5) |
| Education level | |||
| Illiteratea | 1,718 (28.0) | 420 (17.3) | 1,298 (34.9) |
| Primary school | 1,886 (30.7) | 615 (25.4) | 1,271 (34.1) |
| Junior high school | 1,598 (26.0) | 705 (29.1) | 893 (24.0) |
| Senior high / technical school | 720 (11.7) | 486 (20.0) | 234 (6.3) |
| College and above | 223 (3.6) | 198 (8.2) | 25 (0.7) |
| Employment status | |||
| Employeda | 3,522 (57.4) | 916 (37.9) | 2,606 (70.0) |
| Retired | 1,000 (16.3) | 885 (36.6) | 115 (3.1) |
| Unemployed | 1,618 (26.4) | 618 (25.5) | 1,000 (26.9) |
| Insurance coverage | |||
| Uninsureda | 54 (0.9) | 43 (1.8) | 16 (0.4) |
| Insured | 6,081 (99.1) | 2,381 (98.2) | 3,705 (99.6) |
| Smoking status | |||
| Yesa | 1,432 (23.3) | 546 (22.5) | 887 (23.8) |
| No | 4,711 (76.7) | 1,878 (77.5) | 2,834 (76.2) |
| Drinking status | |||
| Yesa | 777 (12.8) | 398 (16.4) | 397 (10.7) |
| No | 5,309 (87.2) | 2,026 (83.6) | 3,324 (89.3) |
| Physical activity | |||
| Yes | 1,828 (29.9) | 1,175 (48.5) | 668 (18.0) |
| Noa | 4,288 (70.1) | 1,249 (51.5) | 3,053 (82.0) |
| Health education | |||
| Yes | 4,723 (76.9) | 1,607 (66.3) | 3,119 (83.8) |
| Noa | 1,418 (23.1) | 817 (33.7) | 602 (16.2) |
| Health examination | |||
| Yes | 3,317 (54.1) | 1,423 (58.7) | 1,898 (51.0) |
| Noa | 2,819 (45.9) | 1,001 (41.3) | 1,823 (49.0) |
a Reference variables in the Tobit regression model. Ln of expenditure means natural logarithm of per capita consumption expenditure
Influencing factors of EQ-5D utility scores from Tobit regression model
| Urban and Rural (model 1) | Urban (model 2) | Rural (model 3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dy/dx | SE | dy/dx | SE | dy/dx | SE | |
| Area (Rural) | ||||||
| Urban | 0.011** | 0.006 | — | — | — | — |
| Lnperexpa | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Gender (Male) | ||||||
| Female | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Age group (15–34) | ||||||
| 45–54 | −0.019 | 0.012 | −0.013 | 0.020 | −0.023 | 0.015 |
| 55–64 | −0.042*** | 0.012 | −0.037** | 0.019 | −0.046*** | 0.015 |
| ≥ .0 | −0.088*** | 0.012 | −0.074*** | 0.020 | −0.099*** | 0.016 |
| Ethnic group (Han) | ||||||
| Others | −0.012 | 0.018 | −0.010 | 0.038 | −0.019 | 0.021 |
| Region (Shannan) | ||||||
| Guanzhong | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.013 | 0.009 | −0.001 | 0.007 |
| Shanbei | −0.024*** | 0.008 | −0.013 | 0.013 | −0.031*** | 0.009 |
| Marital status (Married) | ||||||
| Single | −0.018 | 0.019 | 0.011 | 0.041 | −0.028 | 0.022 |
| Divorced | −0.027*** | 0.007 | −0.037*** | 0.010 | −0.019** | 0.008 |
| Widowed | −0.090** | 0.031 | −0.070* | 0.036 | −0.110** | 0.062 |
| Education (Illiterate) | ||||||
| Primary school | 0.025*** | 0.006 | 0.029** | 0.011 | 0.023*** | 0.008 |
| Junior high school | 0.052*** | 0.008 | 0.058*** | 0.012 | 0.048*** | 0.010 |
| Senior high / technical school | 0.052*** | 0.010 | 0.061*** | 0.014 | 0.051*** | 0.015 |
| College and above | 0.083*** | 0.018 | 0.069*** | 0.020 | 0.234*** | 0.078 |
| Employment (Employed) | ||||||
| Retired | −0.040*** | 0.009 | −0.057*** | 0.011 | −0.022 | 0.019 |
| Unemployed | −0.058*** | 0.006 | −0.057*** | 0.010 | −0.060*** | 0.007 |
| Insurance (Uninsured) | ||||||
| Insured | −0.001 | 0.027 | −0.031 | 0.032 | 0.066 | 0.047 |
| Smoking status (Yes) | ||||||
| No smoking | −0.014 | 0.009 | −0.015 | 0.011 | −0.013 | 0.009 |
| Drinking status (Yes) | ||||||
| No drinking | −0.018 | 0.011 | −0.020 | 0.012 | −0.016 | 0.012 |
| Physical activity (No) | ||||||
| Yes | 0.033*** | 0.006 | 0.053*** | 0.008 | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Health education (No) | ||||||
| Yes | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Health examination (No) | ||||||
| Yes | 0.025*** | 0.005 | 0.022*** | 0.008 | 0.026*** | 0.007 |
| LR | 832.79 | 358.22 | 498.94 | |||
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| N | 5,879 | 2,241 | 3,629 | |||
*P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01. N are the number of respondents included in the Logistic regression models
a Natural logarithm of per capita consumption expenditure. Reference variables are in the parentheses