| Literature DB >> 27429640 |
Mónica Villalba-Campos1, Sandra Rocío Ramírez-Clavijo1, Magda Carolina Sánchez-Corredor1, Milena Rondón-Lagos1, Milcíades Ibáñez-Pinilla2, Ruth Marien Palma3, Marcela Eugenia Varona-Uribe2, Lilian Chuaire-Noack1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For several years, cell-free DNA has been emerging as an important biomarker for non-invasive diagnostic in a wide range of clinical conditions and diseases. The limited information available on the genotoxic effects associated with occupational exposure to car paints, as well as the fact that up-to-date there are not reports about cell-free DNA measurements for assessing this condition, led us to evaluate the DNA damage caused by the occupational exposure to organic solvents contained in car paints, through the quantification of the cell-free DNA and the comet assay, in a sample of 33 individuals taken from 10 automobile paint shops located in Bogota DC, Colombia.Entities:
Keywords: Car painters; Cell-free DNA; Comet assay; Genotoxicity; Occupational exposure; Organic solvents
Year: 2016 PMID: 27429640 PMCID: PMC4946235 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-016-0123-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol ISSN: 1745-6673 Impact factor: 2.646
Biological markers of oxidative stress
| Type of damage | Marker of damage |
|---|---|
|
| 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-OHG) |
| Abasic (AP) sites | |
| BPDE DNA Adduct | |
| Double-strand DNA breaks | |
| Comet Assay (general DNA damage) | |
| UV DNA Damage (CPD, 6-4PP) | |
|
| 4-Hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) |
| 8-iso-Prostaglandin F2alpha (8-isoprostane) | |
| Malondialdehyde (MDA) | |
| Thiobarbituric acid reacting substances (TBARS) | |
|
| Universal ROS/RNS |
| Hydrogen Peroxide | |
| Nitric Oxide | |
|
| Catalase |
| Glutathione | |
| Superoxide Dismutase | |
| Oxygen Radical Antioxidant Capacity (ORAC) | |
| Hydroxyl Radical Antioxidant Capacity (HORAC) | |
| Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) | |
|
| 3-Nitrotyrosine |
| Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE) | |
| Advanced Oxidation Protein Products (AOPP) | |
| BPDE Protein Adduct |
Epidemiologic characterization of the cohorts
| Characteristics | Exposed ( | Non-exposed ( | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ages (mean ± SD) | 46,18 ± 14.59 | 46,18 ± 14.68 | 1,000 |
| Time of exposure in months (mean ± SD) | 234,33 ± 141,38 (median = 212,00) | ||
| Smokers | 5 (15,2 %) | 7 (21,2 %) | 0,687 (e) |
| Alcohol intake | 32 (97,0 %) | 28 (84,8 %) | 0,219 (e) |
SD standard deviation
Fig. 1Types of comet obtained from the alkaline comet assay. a Positive control. Predominance of type 3 is observed, which means that over 50 % of the DNA has migrated from the core. Magnification: 10×. b Exposed individual who had comets type 1, 3, and 4, although type 3 was the predominant after making the total count. Magnification: 10×. c Non-exposed individual. The observable comets correspond entirely to type 1, where less than 25 % of the DNA has migrated. Magnification: 10×. d In this exposed individual, comets type 1, 2, 3 and 4 are observable, being type 4 the predominant after making the total count. Magnification: 10×
Distribution of comets in the exposed and the non-exposed cohorts
| Type of comets | Exposed % (N) | Non-exposed % (N) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 21,2 (7)* | 81,8 (27)* |
| 2 | 12,1 (4) | 9,1 (3) |
| 3 | 45,5 (15)** | 9,1 (3) ** |
| 4 | 21,2 (7) | 0 |
**p < 0,01, *p < 0,05
cfDNA concentrations (ng/mL) in the exposed and the non-exposed cohorts
| Exposed | Non-exposed | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2398,90 | 1301,83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Standard deviation | 1513,28 | 1276,32 |
| Median | 1991,00 | 994,00 |
| N | 33 | 33 |
cfDNA levels in the exposed and the non-exposed cohorts
| cfDNA levels (ng/mL) | Exposed % (N) | Non-exposed % (N) |
|---|---|---|
| Low (0–580)a | 9,1 (3) | 30,3 (10) |
| Medium (581–2500)a | 57,6 (19) | 51,5 (17) |
| High (>2500)a | 33,3 (11) | 18,2 (6) |
aReference values
Fig. 2Mean and 95 % confidence interval of cfDNA concentrations by range of exposure time in the exposed cohort. Exposure time to airborne solvent vapors significantly increased the extent of DNA damage assessed by cfDNA concentration (r = 0,28, p = 0,053, Spearman rank correlation)