| Literature DB >> 27429590 |
Liu Peiqi1, Guo Zhaozhong1, Yin Yaotian1, Jia Jun1, Guo Jihua1, Jia Rong1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignancy of head and neck with high mortality rates. The mechanisms of initiation and development of OSCC remain largely unknown. Dysregulated alternative splicing of pre-mRNA has been associated with OSCC. Splicing factor SRSF3 is a proto-oncogene and overexpressed in multiple cancers. The aim of this study was to uncover the relationship between SRSF3 and carcinogenesis and progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN AND METHODS: The expression of SRSF3 in oral normal, dysplasia, or carcinoma tissues was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The expression levels of EMT-related genes were quantified by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. The expression of SRSF3 in DMBA treated primary cultured oral epithelial cells were analyzed by western blot. RESULT: SRSF3 is overexpressed in oral cancer and moderate or severe dysplasia tissues. Patients with high grade cancer or lymphatic metastasis showed up-regulated expression of SRSF3. Knockdown of SRSF3 repressed the expression of Snail and N-cadherin in vitro. Carcinogen DMBA treated primary cultured oral epithelial cells showed significantly increased SRSF3 level than in control cells.Entities:
Keywords: SRSF3; metastasis.; oral squamous cell carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27429590 PMCID: PMC4946124 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.14871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Expression of SRSF3 in normal, dysplasia, or OSCC tissues.
| Histopathological Classification | Case number (%) | SRSF3 staining | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| Normal oral mucosa | 14 (13.7%) | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.012 |
| Dysplasia | 11 (10.8%) | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | |
| OSCC | 77 (75.5%) | 24 | 25 | 20 | 8 | |
Correlation of SRSF3 expression with the grading of oral epithelia dysplasia.
| Classification | Case number (%) | SRSF3 staining | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Normal oral mucosa | 14 (13.7%) | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Dysplasia | Mild | 5 (45.5%) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.53a |
| Moderate to severe | 6 (54.5%) | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.006b | |
| Sex (dysplasia) | Male | 6 (54.5%) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.121 |
| Female | 5 (45.5%) | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Age (displasia) | ≤55 | 4 (36.4%) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.927 |
| >55 | 7 (63.6%) | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||
a, Normal vs mild dysplasia, b, Normal vs moderate to severe dysplasia.
Figure 1Expression of SRSF3 in oral epithelial dysplasia and cancers. Expression of SRSF3 was analyzed with immunohistochemistry in normal (A), mild dysplasia (B), severe dysplasia (C), grade I OSCC (D), grade I-II OSCC (E), or grade II-III OSCC tissues (F). (A-F: magnification ×40).
Correlation of SRSF3 expression with clinicopathologic characteristics of OSCC patients.
| Classification | Case number (%) | SRSF3 staining | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Tumor grade | I | 12 (15.6%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.016 |
| I-II & II | 49 (63.6%) | 11 | 18 | 16 | 4 | ||
| II-III & III | 16 (20.8%) | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | ||
| Lymphatic metastasis | Positive | 38 (49.3%) | 10 | 8 | 15 | 5 | 0.038 |
| Negative | 39 (50.7%) | 16 | 14 | 5 | 4 | ||
| Gender | Male | 58 (75.3%) | 17 | 19 | 13 | 9 | 0.550 |
| Female | 19 (24.7%) | 6 | 7 | 5 | 1 | ||
| Age | ≤55 | 38 (49.4%) | 13 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 0.298 |
| >55 | 39 (50.6%) | 11 | 10 | 13 | 5 | ||
| Tobacco Smoking | Positive | 41 (53.2%) | 11 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0.59 |
| Negative | 36 (46.8%) | 13 | 9 | 11 | 3 | ||
| Drinking | Positive | 34 (44.2%) | 7 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 0.110 |
| Negative | 43 (55.8%) | 17 | 12 | 10 | 4 | ||
Figure 2Expression of SRSF3 is associated with lymphatic metastasis of OSCC. Expression of SRSF3 was analyzed with immunohistochemistry in OSCC patients with or without lymphatic metastasis (magnification ×40).
Figure 3SRSF3 regulates the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) related-genes. FaDu cells were treated with siRNA twice in an interval of 48 hours. (A) The expression of E-cadherin (E-cad), Slug, Twist, Snail and Vimentin (VIM) was analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. GAPDH served as the reference. (B) Western blot showed knockdown efficiency of SRSF3 in FaDu cells. GAPDH served as loading control.
Figure 4Carcinogen increased the expression of SRSF3. (A) Expression of SRSF3 in primary cultured oral epithelial cells (N1 and N2) and CAL 27 (an oral cancer cell line) was analyzed with western blot. (B) Primary cultured oral epithelial cells (N2) were treated with DMBA (5 µg/ml) for two days. DMSO treatment was used as control. Western blot was used to analyze the expression of SRSF3. β-actin served as loading control.