Literature DB >> 27429417

Myopia-What is Old and What is New?

Frank Schaeffel1.   

Abstract

The recent "boom of myopia," described predominantly for East Asia, is assumed to result from increasingly demanding education programs that include extensive near work (and perhaps also extensive use of computers) and little exposure to bright light as found outdoors. Already in 1892, Hermann Cohn stated that the prevalence of myopia is related to the educational level which is related to the economic status of a country. It is not much appreciated that the rates of myopia were already high among school children in central Europe in the middle of the 19th century, as described by Hermann Cohn. From extensive research in recent times, three major approaches have emerged to interfere with myopia progression in children: (1) promoting exposure to bright light and enforce outdoor activity, (2) adapting/improving optical corrections and visual behavior to generate inhibitory signals for eye growth in the retina, and (3) applying atropine eye drops at low doses. However, Hermann Cohn had already proposed that low luminances during school work promote myopia development and requested that lighting in the classrooms needs to be at least "10 meter candles" (equivalent to an illuminance of 10 lux). Different from today, he explained the link between low light and myopia by shorter reading distances that he observed at low luminances of the reading surface (<<1 cd/m). He suggested that short reading distances should be avoided in children and described several devices to control them. He further suggested that reading duration should be limited and urged myopes to choose professions that do not involve extensive near work. He also studied the effects of atropine against myopia but concluded that the side effects make it less useful than simply "3-4 weeks without reading." In summary, a number of his findings were re-discovered today, but they are now much better supported by data, and their interpretations have changed, at least in some aspects.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27429417     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  4 in total

Review 1.  Stopping the rise of myopia in Asia.

Authors:  Lothar Spillmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Understanding and Treating Myopia: What More We Need to Know and Future Research Priorities.

Authors:  Sally A McFadden
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  [Analysis of spectacle lens prescriptions shows no increase of myopia in Germany from 2000 to 2015].

Authors:  W Wesemann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia.

Authors:  Ranjay Chakraborty; Lisa A Ostrin; Debora L Nickla; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue; Richard A Stone
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.117

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.