Literature DB >> 27429022

Long-term Health-related Quality of Life Following Esophagectomy: A Nonrandomized Comparison of Thoracoscopically Assisted and Open Surgery.

Andrew P Barbour1, Orla M Mc Cormack, Peter J Baker, Jodi Hirst, Lutz Krause, Sandra Brosda, Janine M Thomas, Jane M Blazeby, Iain G Thomson, David C Gotley, Bernard M Smithers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients after thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Trials comparing minimally invasive with open transthoracic esophagectomy have shown improved short-term outcomes; however, long-term HRQL data are lacking. This prospective nonrandomized study compared HRQL and survival after thoracoscopically assisted McKeown esophagectomy (TAMK) and open transthoracic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (TTIL) for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.
METHODS: Patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer selected for TAMK or TTIL completed baseline and follow-up HRQL assessments for up to 24 months using the EORTC generic and disease-specific measures, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18. Baseline clinical variables were examined between the treatment groups and changes in mean HRQL scores over time estimated and tested using generalised estimating equations with propensity score (generated by boosted regression) adjustment.
RESULTS: Of the 487 patients, 377 underwent TAMK and 110 underwent TTIL. Most clinical variables were similar in the 2 groups; however, there were significantly more patients with AJCC stage 3 disease who underwent TTIL than TAMK (54% vs 32%, P < 0.01) and this was reflected in the survival data.Mean symptom scores for pain were significantly higher in the TTIL group than in TAMK for 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.036). In addition, mean constipation scores were significantly higher for the TTIL group, with a 15-point difference in mean score at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: This large comprehensive nonrandomized analysis of longitudinal HRQL shows that TTIL is associated with more pain and constipation than TAMK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27429022     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Daniele Bernardi; Marco Sozzi; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-16

2.  Long-term health-related quality of life following robot-assisted radical transmediastinal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kotaro Sugawara; Shuntaro Yoshimura; Koichi Yagi; Masato Nishida; Susumu Aikou; Yukinori Yamagata; Kazuhiko Mori; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave's syndrome).

Authors:  Jessie A Elliott; Louise Buckley; Mohamed Albagir; Antonios Athanasiou; Thomas J Murphy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yasushi Toh; Masaru Morita; Manabu Yamamoto; Yuichiro Nakashima; Masahiko Sugiyama; Hideo Uehara; Yoshiaki Fujimoto; Yuki Shin; Keiichi Shiokawa; Emi Ohnishi; Tomonari Shimagaki; Yohei Mano; Keishi Sugimachi
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.230

5.  The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Xiaomei Yang; Donghong Geng; Yingfei Duan; Junke Fu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Complications and survival after hybrid and fully minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  M M K Veenstra; B M Smithers; E Visser; D Edholm; S Brosda; J M Thomas; D C Gotley; I G Thomson; B P L Wijnhoven; A P Barbour
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-01-08

7.  Long-term health-related quality of life after McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  E Jezerskyte; L M Saadeh; E R C Hagens; M A G Sprangers; L Noteboom; H W M van Laarhoven; W J Eshuis; M C C M Hulshof; M I van Berge Henegouwen; S S Gisbertz
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Zheng; Xiao-Kun Li; Chi Zhang; Hai Zhou; Sai-Guang Ji; Ji-Hong Zhong; Yang Xu; Zhuang-Zhuang Cong; Gao-Ming Wang; Wen-Jie Wu; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Siaw-Acheampong; S K Kamarajah; R Gujjuri; J R Bundred; P Singh; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07

10.  Development and Feasibility of a Mobile Health-Supported Comprehensive Intervention Model (CIMmH) for Improving the Quality of Life of Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy: Prospective, Single-Arm, Nonrandomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Chao Cheng; Rainbow Tin Hung Ho; Yan Guo; Mengting Zhu; Weixiong Yang; Yiran Li; Zhenguo Liu; Shuyu Zhuo; Qi Liang; Zhenghong Chen; Yu Zeng; Jiali Yang; Zhanfei Zhang; Xu Zhang; Aliza Monroe-Wise; Sai-Ching Yeung
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.