Literature DB >> 27427090

The effect of pH on charge inversion and condensation of DNA.

Zilong Guo1, Yanwei Wang, Anthony Yang, Guangcan Yang.   

Abstract

Charge inversion and condensation of DNA in solutions of trivalent and quadrivalent counterions are significantly influenced by the pH value of the solution. We systematically investigated the condensation and charge compensation of DNA by spermidine, hexammine cobalt(iii) (cohex, [Co(NH3)6](3+)) and spermine in solutions of a wide range of pH values from 3 to 9.3 by dynamic light scattering, magnetic tweezers, and atomic force microscopy. In trivalent counterion solution, we found that there is a critical concentration (0.75 mM for cohex and 0.5 mM for spermidine), under which the electrophoresis mobility of DNA initially increases, reaches a maximum, and finally decreases when the pH value is decreased. In contrast, above the critical concentration, the electrophoretic mobility of DNA increases monotonously with decreasing pH value of the solution. The corresponding condensing force has the same dependence on the pH value. However, for the case of quadrivalent counterions, the electrophoretic mobility of DNA is monotonously promoted by lowering the pH value of the solution at any concentration of counterions in which charge inversion of DNA may occur. In atomic force microscopy images and force spectroscopy of magnetic tweezers, we found that maximal charge neutralization and condensation force correspond to the most compact DNA condensation. We propose a mechanism of promoting DNA charge neutralization: small and highly mobile hydrogen ions tend to attach to the DNA-counterion complex to further neutralize its remaining charge, which is related to the surface area of the complex. Therefore, this further neutralization is prominent when the complex is toroidal which corresponds to the case of mild ion concentration while it is less prominent for more compact globules or rod complexes at high counterion concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27427090     DOI: 10.1039/c6sm01344a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  9 in total

1.  The promotion and suppression of DNA charge neutralization by the cosolute ectoine.

Authors:  Benteng Chen; Yanwei Wang; Guangcan Yang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Visualization of DNA Damage and Protection by Atomic Force Microscopy in Liquid.

Authors:  Tinghui Dai; Yanwei Wang; Guangcan Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Increasing Transfection Efficiency of Lipoplexes by Modulating Complexation Solution for Transient Gene Expression.

Authors:  Jaemun Kim; Ji Yul Kim; Hyeonkyeong Kim; Eunsil Kim; Soonyong Park; Kyoung-Hwa Ryu; Eun Gyo Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Demonstration of pH-controlled DNA-surfactant manipulation for biomolecules.

Authors:  Na Li; Zijuan Liao; Shupeng He; Xiao Chen; Shenhao Huang; Yanwei Wang; Guangcan Yang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  DNA-Lysozyme Nanoarchitectonics: Quantitative Investigation on Charge Inversion and Compaction.

Authors:  Rongyan Zhang; Yanwei Wang; Guangcan Yang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  An unexpected dual-response pH probe based on acridine.

Authors:  Liang Xu; Xiangzhen Yan; Chunxue Yuan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 7.  Archaea: The Final Frontier of Chromatin.

Authors:  Shawn P Laursen; Samuel Bowerman; Karolin Luger
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Biodegradable Polymers for Gene Delivery.

Authors:  T J Thomas; Heidar-Ali Tajmir-Riahi; C K S Pillai
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  pH-Controlled Coacervate-Membrane Interactions within Liposomes.

Authors:  Mart G F Last; Siddharth Deshpande; Cees Dekker
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 15.881

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.