| Literature DB >> 27426088 |
Fatma Al-Husseiny1,2, Mohamed Ahmed Sobh3, Rehab H Ashour4, Samah Foud2, Tarek Medhat5, Abdel-Hady El-Gilany6, Doaa Elghannam7, Hassan Abdel-Ghaffar7, Mohamed-Ahdy Saad4,2, Mohamed Sobh5,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cisplatin is a nephrotoxic chemotherapeutic agent. So, preventive measures worth to be evaluated. Human amniotic fluid stem cells (hAFSCs) in prevention or amelioration of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in Sprague-Dawley rates have been tested.Entities:
Keywords: Cisplatin; Human amniotic fluid Stem cells; Oxidative stress; nephrotoxicity
Year: 2016 PMID: 27426088 PMCID: PMC4961106 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc.2016.9.1.70
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 2.500
Effect of hAFSCs on biochemical measurements (n=20/group)
| Group I | Group II | Group III | Group VI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr.Cr. (mg/dl) | Day 4 | 0.40±0.12 | 1.92±0.03* | 1.02±0.08*,§ | 1.88±0.1*# |
| Day 7 | 0.37±0.12 | 1.61±0.05*,‡ | 0.85±0.08*,§,‡ | 1.63±0.03*,#,‡ | |
| Day 11 | 0.41±0.11 | 1.00±0.07*,‡,† | 0.70±0.06*,§,‡ | 1.02±0.1*,#,‡,† | |
| Day 30 | 0.39±0.10 | 0.77±0.03*,‡,†,• | 0.85±0.05*,§,‡ | 0.81±0.04*,#,‡,†,• | |
| BUN (mg/dl) | Day 4 | 18.6±1.14 | 85.6±1.67* | 34.4±1.14*,§ | 85.4±1.14*,# |
| Day 7 | 18.2±1.48 | 55.2±1.30*,‡ | 28.0±1.22*,§,‡ | 53.8±0.84*,#,‡ | |
| Day 11 | 17.2±1.48 | 32.3±1.48*,‡,† | 24.4±0.89*,§,‡,† | 32.4±1.51*,#,‡,† | |
| Day 30 | 18.0±1.58 | 26.4±0.55*,‡,†,• | 23.2±0.84*,§,‡ | 26.2±0.83*,#,‡,†,• | |
| Cr. Cl. (ml/min/100 gm) | Day 4 | 1.62±0.44 | 0.007±0.001* | 0.018±0.06* | 0.008±0.001*,‡ |
| Day 7 | 1.78±0.55 | 0.014±0.001*,‡ | 0.045±0.001*,§,‡ | 0.012±0.002*,#,‡ | |
| Day 11 | 1.86±0.56 | 0.050±0.01*,‡,† | 0.060±0.007*,‡,† | 0.050±0.013*,‡,† | |
| Day 30 | 1.76±0.55 | 0.360±0.17*,‡,†,• | 1.000±0.14*,§,‡,†,• | 0.460±0.26*,‡,†,• |
Significant difference compared to corresponding *control, §cisplatin group and #cisplatin+hAFSCs group.
Significant difference compared to intragroup ‡day 4, †day 7, •day 11 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by posthoc multiple comparisons (Scheffé test) at p≤0.05.
Effect of hAFSCs on renal tissue oxidative stress parameters (n=20/group)
| Group I | Group II | Group III | Group VI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA (nmol/g tissue) | Day 4 | 14.6±1.61 | 66.5±2.83* | 34.7±6.72*,§ | 66.6±2.68*,# |
| Day 7 | 14.9±1.50 | 64.9±3.93*,‡ | 26.1±2.13*,§,‡ | 66.9±2.29*,# | |
| Day 11 | 15.4±1.63 | 35.5±3.33*,‡,† | 17.8±1.78§,‡,† | 34.8±2.84*,#,‡,† | |
| Day 30 | 15.1±1.62 | 30.1±4.61*,‡,† | 17.6±2.29§,‡,† | 28.1±1.58*,#,‡,†,• | |
| GSH (mmol/g tissue) | Day 4 | 5.40±0.25 | 0.26±0.03* | 0.76±0.02*,§ | 0.26±0.02*,# |
| Day 7 | 5.44±0.23 | 0.54±0.03*,‡ | 2.64±0.36*,§,‡ | 0.52±0.03*,#,‡ | |
| Day 11 | 5.55±0.17 | 1.49±0.33*,‡,† | 3.55±0.15*,§,‡,† | 1.32±0.30*,#,‡,† | |
| Day 30 | 5.32±0.31 | 1.92±0.03*,‡,† | 3.98±0.43*,§,‡,† | 1.91±0.05*,#,‡,†,• | |
| SOD (U/g tissue) | Day 4 | 20.36±1.70 | 2.98±0.19* | 6.93±0.42*,§ | 2.94±0.23*,# |
| Day 7 | 19.92±1.39 | 6.24±0.42*,‡ | 10.69±0.33*,§,‡ | 6.22±0.45*,#,‡ | |
| Day 11 | 19.88±1.40 | 9.98±0.32*,‡,† | 15.73±0.29*,§,‡,† | 10.0±0.25*,#,‡,† | |
| Day 30 | 20.22±1.70 | 15.3±0.36*,‡,†,• | 18.74±0.15§,‡,†,• | 15.6±0.49*,#,‡,†,• |
Significant difference compared to corresponding *control, §cisplatin group and #cisplatin+hAFSCs group.
Significant difference compared to intragroup ‡day 4, †day 7, •day 11 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by posthoc multiple comparisons (Scheffé test) at p≤0.05.
Active injury score, Regeneration score, and Chronicity score in OSOM of different experimental groups (n=20)
| Group I | Group II | Group III | Group VI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active injury score | Day 4 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 7.0 (7.0~7.0)* | 3.0 (2.0~3.0)*,§ | 6.0 (6.0~7.0)*,# |
| Day 7 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 6.0 (6.0~6.0)* | 3.0 (2.0~3.0)*,§ | 6.0 (6.0~6.0)*,# | |
| Day 11 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 4.0 (4.0~4.0)*,‡ | 1.0 (1.0~1.0)*,§,‡ | 6.0 (5.0~6.0)*,# | |
| Day 30 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 4.0 (4.0~4.0)*,‡ | 1.0 (1.0~1.0)*,§,‡ | 3.0 (3.0~3.0)*,#,‡,• | |
| Regeneration score | Day 4 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 4.0 (3.0~5.0)*,§ | 0.0 (0.0~0.0)# |
| Day 7 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 7.0 (6.0~7.0)*,§ | 0.0 (0.0~0.0)# | |
| Day 11 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 1.0 (1.0~2.0)*,‡ | 8.0 (8.0~8.0)*,§,‡ | 1.0 (1.0~2.0)*,#,‡ | |
| Day 30 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 3.0 (3.0~3.0)*,‡,• | 8.0 (7.0~9.0)*,§,‡ | 3.0 (3.0-3.0)*,#,‡,• | |
| Chronicity score | Day 4 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 3.0 (3.0~3.0)* | 2.0 (2.0~2.0)*,§ | 3.0 (3.0~3.0)*,# |
| Day 7 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 4.0 (4.0~4.0)* | 2.0 (2.0~2.0)*,§ | 4.0 (4.0~5.0)*,# | |
| Day 11 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 5.0 (5.0~5.0)*,‡ | 2.0 (2.0~2.0)*,§ | 5.0 (5.0~5.0)*,#,‡ | |
| Day 30 | 0.0 (0.0~0.0) | 3.0 (3.0~4.0)*,• | 2.0 (2.0~2.0)*,§ | 3.0 (3.0~3.0)*,#,• |
Significant difference compared to corresponding *control, §cisplatin group and #cisplatin+hAFSCs group.
Significant difference compared to intragroup ‡day 4, †day 7, •day 11 by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney’s tests at p≤0.05.
Abbr.; OSOM: outer strip of outer medulla.
Fig. 1Day 4: (A) Pathological changes in cisplatin injected rats (group I) at day4 shows necrotic dilated tubules in outer strip outer medulla (OSOM) where the tubules are dilated with thin denuded lining epithelium with Marked degenerative changes. It varied from tubular cell vacuolar degeneration, up to complete tubular necrosis and shedding of tubular cells (6~10 tubules/HPFs) (H&E ×200). (B) Histopathologic changes in hAFSCs-treated rats sacrificed after 4 days, OSOM shows less tubular necrosis with focal tubular dilation and occasional mitosis Mild regenerative changes were also detected in OSOM in the form of some regenerating tubules (5%) lined by large cells with prominent nucleoli and with occasional mitotic figures. No solid sheets were detected (H&E ×200).
Fig. 2Day 11: (A) kidney sections obtained from cisplatin injected rats at the 11th day revealed that the degenerative changes varied from tubular cell vacuolar degeneration, up to complete tubular necrosis. Also there was mild interstitial round cell infiltrate. Regenerative changes were also detected and varied from tubular cell enlargement with regenerative atypia, mitosis and interstitial solid sheet formation (H&E ×200). (B) Kidney sections obtained from cisplatin injected rats treated with hAFSCs via tail vein and scarified at the 11th day revealed necrotic tubules with tubular dilatation (1~2 tubules/HPFs). Regenerative changes were detected in the form of solid sheets (3/10 HPFs), mitosis (1~2/10 HPFs) and presence of regenerating tubules. The interstitium was the seat of solid sheets and round cell infiltration (H&E ×200).