Literature DB >> 27425384

Dissecting the influence of the collinear and flanking bars in White's effect.

Barbara Blakeslee1, Ganesh Padmanabhan2, Mark E McCourt2.   

Abstract

In White's effect equiluminant test patches placed on the black and white bars of a square-wave grating appear different in brightness. The illusion has generated intense interest because the direction of the brightness effect does not correlate with the amount of black or white border in contact with the test patch, or in its general vicinity. Therefore, unlike brightness induction effects such as simultaneous contrast, White's effect is not consistent with explanations based on contrast or assimilation that depend solely on the relative amounts of black and white surrounding the test patches. We independently manipulated the luminance of the collinear and flanking bars to investigate their influence on test patch matching luminance (brightness). The inducing grating was a 0.5c/d square-wave and test patches measured 1.0° in width and either 0.5° or 3.0° in height. Test patches measuring 0.5° in height had more extensive contact with the collinear bars and test patches measuring 3.0° in height had more extensive contact with the flanking bars. The luminance of the collinear (or flanking) bars assumed twenty values from 3.2 to 124.8cd/m(2), while the luminance of the flanking (or collinear) bars remained white (124.8cd/m(2)) or black (3.2cd/m(2)). Under these conditions the influence of the collinear and flanking bars was found to be purely in the direction of contrast. The effect was dominated by contrast from the collinear bars (which results in White's effect), however, the influence of the flanking bars was also in the contrast direction. The data elucidate the luminance relationships between the collinear and flanking bars which produce the behavior associated with White's effect as well as that associated with "the inverted White effect" which is akin to simultaneous contrast.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assimilation mechanism; Contrast mechanism; Inverted White effect; Simultaneous contrast; White’s effect

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27425384      PMCID: PMC5035611          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  31 in total

1.  Classical and inverted White's effects.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; W Gerbino
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances.

Authors:  E G HEINEMANN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-08

3.  A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Lightness, brightness and transparency: a quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy.

Authors:  Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Essay concerning color constancy.

Authors:  D Jameson; L M Hurvich
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization: a parsimonious model of brightness induction in a continuum of stimuli including White, Howe and simultaneous brightness contrast.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Wren Pasieka; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Low-level features determine brightness in White's and Benary's illusions.

Authors:  Viljami R Salmela; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Induced effects of backgrounds and foregrounds in three-dimensional configurations: the role of T-junctions.

Authors:  Q Zaidi; B Spehar; M Shy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  The critical role of relative luminance relations in White's effect and grating induction.

Authors:  B Spehar; A Gilchrist; L Arend
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  When is spatial filtering enough? Investigation of brightness and lightness perception in stimuli containing a visible illumination component.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lightness induction enhancements and limitations at low frequency modulations across a variety of stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Louis Nicholas Vinke; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.