Literature DB >> 27425211

Motor cortical plasticity in extrinsic hand muscles is determined by the resting thresholds of overlapping representations.

J L Mirdamadi1, L Y Suzuki1, S K Meehan2.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the properties that govern the effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions is critical to clinical application. Extrapolation to clinical populations has been limited by high inter-subject variability and a focus on intrinsic muscles of the hand in healthy populations. Therefore, the current study assessed variability of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a patterned TMS protocol, across an agonist-antagonist pair of extrinsic muscles of the hand. Secondarily, we assessed whether concurrent agonist contraction could enhance the efficacy of cTBS. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were simultaneously recorded from the agonist flexor (FCR) and antagonist extensor (ECR) carpi radialis before and after cTBS over the FCR hotspot. cTBS was delivered with the FCR relaxed (cTBS-Relax) or during isometric wrist flexion (cTBS-Contract). cTBS-Relax suppressed FCR MEPs evoked from the FCR hotspot. However, the extent of FCR MEP suppression was strongly correlated with the relative difference between FCR and ECR resting motor thresholds. cTBS-Contract decreased FCR suppression but increased suppression of ECR MEPs elicited from the FCR hotspot. The magnitude of ECR MEP suppression following cTBS-Contract was independent of the threshold-amplitude relationships observed with cTBS-Relax. Contraction alone had no effect confirming the effect of cTBS-Contract was driven by the interaction between neuromuscular activity and cTBS. Interactions across muscle representations should be taken into account when predicting cTBS outcomes in healthy and clinical populations. Contraction during cTBS may be a useful means of focusing aftereffects when differences in baseline excitability across overlapping agonist-antagonist cortical representations may mitigate the inhibitory effect of cTBS.
Copyright © 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraction; flexor carpi radialis; motor cortex; plasticity; theta burst stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27425211      PMCID: PMC5897902          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  25 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  J N Sanes; J P Donoghue
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Properties of primary motor cortex output to forelimb muscles in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Michael C Park; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  I-wave origin and modulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; P Profice; F Ranieri; F Capone; M Dileone; A Oliviero; F Pilato
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Mechanisms and applications of theta-burst rTMS on the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Dennis A Nowak; Thomas Kammer; Robert C Wolf; Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Agonist contraction during intermittent theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortical plasticity of the wrist flexors.

Authors:  J L Mirdamadi; L Y Suzuki; S K Meehan
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Functional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases motor cortex excitability in survivors of stroke.

Authors:  Crystal L Massie; Brian L Tracy; Matthew P Malcolm
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Promoting use-dependent plasticity with externally-paced training.

Authors:  Suzanne J Ackerley; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Birkenmeier; Eliza M Prager; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Motor-learning impairment by amantadine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Abdallah Hadj Tahar; Pierre J Blanchet; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  3 in total

1.  Aftereffects of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation in Adjacent, Non-Target Muscles.

Authors:  Timothy P Morris; Paula Davila-Pérez; Ali Jannati; Arianna Menardi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter J Fried
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  The Role of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Surrogate Marker of Disease Activity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Muhannad M Alsharidah; Mohammad Uzair; Sarah S Alseneidi; Afnan A Alkharan; Reem Fahd Bunyan; Shahid Bashir
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

3.  Interindividual Variability of Lower-Limb Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Theta Burst Stimulation.

Authors:  Natsuki Katagiri; Shinya Yoshida; Tadaki Koseki; Daisuke Kudo; Shigehiro Namba; Shigeo Tanabe; Ying-Zu Huang; Tomofumi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.