Literature DB >> 2742484

Nonoperative treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer.

T V Berne1, A J Donovan.   

Abstract

This report concerns 35 adult patients in whom perforation of a duodenal or prepyloric ulcer was treated nonoperatively between July 1979 and April 1988 at the Los Angeles County--University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles. Each patient had pneumoperitoneum with clinical evidence of peritonitis, and a gastroduodenogram documented a sealed perforation. The ulcer was believed to be acute in 27 patients and chronic in 8. These 35 cases represent 12% of 294 cases of duodenal and prepyloric peptic ulcers with perforation treated during the same period. An intra-abdominal abscess developed in 1 of the 35 patients. Reperforation did not occur. The mortality rate for the 259 cases treated operatively during this period was 6.2%; the mortality rate of the 35 cases treated nonoperatively was 3%. Duodenal ulcer can be safely treated nonoperatively when a gastroduodenogram documents self-sealing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2742484     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410070084017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  15 in total

1.  Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M Stapfer; R R Selby; S C Stain; N Katkhouda; D Parekh; N Jabbour; D Garry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  M Khoursheed; M Fuad; H Safar; H Dashti; A Behbehani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A bacteriological study of perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  N Shinagawa; M Muramoto; S Sakurai; T Fukui; K Hori; M Taniguchi; K Mashita; A Mizuno; J Yura
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1991-01

Review 4.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

7.  Alternative laparoscopic management of perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  D Urbano; M Rossi; P De Simone; P Berloco; D Alfani; R Cortesini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Pneumatosis intestinalis. Two case reports and a retrospective review of the literature from 1985 to 1995.

Authors:  R M Boerner; D B Fried; D M Warshauer; K Isaacs
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Perforation through small bowel malignant tumors.

Authors:  Tzu-Chieh Chao; Hsiao-Hsiang Chao; Yi-Yin Jan; Miin-Fu Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Management of ERCP-related perforations: outcomes of single institution in Korea.

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Byung Moo Yoo; Jin Hong Kim; Myung Wook Kim; Wook Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.