Literature DB >> 19130154

Management of ERCP-related perforations: outcomes of single institution in Korea.

Ji Hun Kim1, Byung Moo Yoo, Jin Hong Kim, Myung Wook Kim, Wook Hwan Kim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze clinicoradiologic findings and treatment outcomes of patients with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforations. Between May 2003 and November 2007, 2,247 ERCP procedures with or without sphincterotomy were performed at Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea, and 20 perforations (0.89%) were identified. DISCUSSION: We retrospectively reviewed medical and surgical records of each patient. Of 18 patients, 11 patients (61.1%) underwent nonsurgical management, and seven patients (38.9%) received surgical management. There were no significant differences in age, gender, and laboratory findings between two groups (P > 0.05). The hospital stay was significantly longer in the operative group than that of the conservative group (P < 0.05, respectively). The most common cause of perforation was sphincterotomy (n = 8) in the conservative group whereas scope itself (n = 6) in operative group, showing a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The retroperitoneal air was most common findings in eight patients (72.7%) of the conservative group, while six (85.7%) patients of the operative group presented with intraperitoneal air, displaying a significant difference in location of air between the two groups (P < 0.05). Most of sphincterotomy-related perforations were managed nonsurgically. However, the scope-related perforations were usually large and required immediate surgery. Moreover, the delayed operation resulted in a longer hospital stay and high morbidity. Therefore, the selective early surgical intervention is suggested when scope-related perforations are discovered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19130154     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0786-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  22 in total

1.  Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy.

Authors:  J L Genzlinger; M S McPhee; J K Fisher; K M Jacob; J H Helzberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations.

Authors:  Madhukumar Preetha; Yaw-Fui A Chung; Weng-Hoong Chan; Hock-Soo Ong; Pierce K H Chow; Wai-Keong Wong; London L P J Ooi; Khee-Chee Soo
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  R C Bell; G Van Stiegmann; J Goff; M Reveille; L Norton; N W Pearlman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  ERCP subsequent to retroperitoneal perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Burçak Kayhan; Meral Akdoğan; Burhan Sahin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Retroperitoneal perforation during duodenoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  P Byrne; J W Leung; P B Cotton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Pancreatitis or duodenal perforation after peri-Vaterian therapeutic endoscopic procedures: diagnosis, differentiation, and management.

Authors:  M G Sarr; E K Fishman; F D Milligan; S S Siegelman; J L Cameron
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy.

Authors:  F V Booth; R J Doerr; R S Khalafi; F A Luchette; L M Flint
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Javairiah Fatima; Todd H Baron; Mark D Topazian; Scott G Houghton; Corey W Iqbal; Beverly J Ott; David R Farley; Michael B Farnell; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-05

Review 9.  The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy.

Authors:  P Y Scarlett; G L Falk
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-12

10.  Operative treatment of periampullary retroperitoneal perforation complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sarli; Cristina Porrini; Renato Costi; Gabriele Regina; Vincenzo Violi; Michelina Ferro; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of patients who experienced perforation associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Jaihwan Kim; Sang Hyub Lee; Woo Hyun Paik; Byeong Jun Song; Jin Hyeok Hwang; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Endoscopic management of perforations, leaks and fistulas.

Authors:  Ritu Raj Singh; Jeremy S Nussbaum; Nikhil A Kumta
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-31

Review 3.  Value of temporary stents for the management of perivaterian perforation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Sang Min Lee; Kwang Bum Cho
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Immediate detection of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related periampullary perforation: fluoroscopy or endoscopy?

Authors:  Yasuaki Motomura; Kazuya Akahoshi; Junya Gibo; Kenji Kanayama; Shinichiro Fukuda; Shouhei Hamada; Yoshihiro Otsuka; Masaru Kubokawa; Kiyoshi Kajiyama; Kazuhiko Nakamura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Successful Nonsurgical Treatment of Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, Pneumoperitoneum, Pneumoretroperitoneum, and Subcutaneous Emphysema following ERCP.

Authors:  L Fujii; A Lau; D E Fleischer; M E Harrison
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Early management experience of perforation after ERCP.

Authors:  Guohua Li; Youxiang Chen; Xiaojiang Zhou; Nonghua Lv
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Surgical management of ERCP-related complications.

Authors:  Afshin Fathi; Farhad Lahmi; Rezvaneh Kozegaran
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2011

8.  Duodenal Perforation: Outcomes after Surgical Management at a Tertiary Care Centre-A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Srinivas Bojanapu; Ronak Atulbhai Malani; Samrat Ray; Vivek Mangla; Naimish Mehta; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.