OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increased aortic angulation (AA) on acute procedural success following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: The degree of angulation between the aorta and the heart can make accurate positioning of the bioprosthesis during TAVR more demanding, particularly in instances of an extremely angulated or horizontal aortic root. Nonetheless, there are limited data on the impact of AA on the acute success of TAVR. METHODS: We assessed 582 patients who underwent TAVR at our institute and had contrast computed tomography available for AA evaluation. TAVR endpoints, device success, and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. RESULTS: The mean angulation of the aorta was 47.3 ± 8.7°. Patients were therefore divided into 2 groups: AA <48° and AA ≥48°. AA in the 480 patients who underwent balloon-expandable (BE) TAVR did not influence acute procedural success or short-term clinical outcome. In contrast, increased AA among the 102 patients who underwent self-expandable (SE) TAVR was found to significantly attenuate procedural success (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.85; p = 0.008). The numerical cutoff for AA with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for device success was ≥48° (sensitivity 85%, specificity 61%). Moreover, patients whose AA was ≥48° were also associated with an increased need for a second valve and post-dilation, had increased fluoroscopy time and increased valve embolization, and had increased post-procedural paravalvular regurgitation greater than or equal to mild following SE TAVR. Major complications at 30 days, including mortality were similar between AA groups. Six-month mortality was also similar between both AA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increased aortic root angulation adversely influences acute procedural success following SE but not BE TAVR. Because of these data, BE valves may be preferred when evaluating patients with high AA before TAVR.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increased aortic angulation (AA) on acute procedural success following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: The degree of angulation between the aorta and the heart can make accurate positioning of the bioprosthesis during TAVR more demanding, particularly in instances of an extremely angulated or horizontal aortic root. Nonetheless, there are limited data on the impact of AA on the acute success of TAVR. METHODS: We assessed 582 patients who underwent TAVR at our institute and had contrast computed tomography available for AA evaluation. TAVR endpoints, device success, and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. RESULTS: The mean angulation of the aorta was 47.3 ± 8.7°. Patients were therefore divided into 2 groups: AA <48° and AA ≥48°. AA in the 480 patients who underwent balloon-expandable (BE) TAVR did not influence acute procedural success or short-term clinical outcome. In contrast, increased AA among the 102 patients who underwent self-expandable (SE) TAVR was found to significantly attenuate procedural success (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.85; p = 0.008). The numerical cutoff for AA with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for device success was ≥48° (sensitivity 85%, specificity 61%). Moreover, patients whose AA was ≥48° were also associated with an increased need for a second valve and post-dilation, had increased fluoroscopy time and increased valve embolization, and had increased post-procedural paravalvular regurgitation greater than or equal to mild following SE TAVR. Major complications at 30 days, including mortality were similar between AA groups. Six-month mortality was also similar between both AA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increased aortic root angulation adversely influences acute procedural success following SE but not BE TAVR. Because of these data, BE valves may be preferred when evaluating patients with high AA before TAVR.
Authors: Giuseppe D'Ancona; Stephan Kische; Mohamed El-Mawardy; Martin Dißmann; Helmut Heinze; Dietlind Zohlnhöfer-Momm; Hakan Gürer; Hüseyin Ince Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Matteo Pagnesi; Luca Baldetti; Paolo Del Sole; Antonio Mangieri; Marco B Ancona; Damiano Regazzoli; Nicola Buzzatti; Francesco Giannini; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib Journal: Interv Cardiol Date: 2017-09
Authors: Carla Lucarelli; Saud Khawaja; Richard J Jabbour; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Neil Ruparelia; Sayan Sen; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail Journal: JACC Case Rep Date: 2022-07-06