Literature DB >> 27423949

A validation of technologies monitoring dairy cow feeding, ruminating, and lying behaviors.

M R Borchers1, Y M Chang2, I C Tsai1, B A Wadsworth1, J M Bewley3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate commercially available precision dairy technologies against direct visual observations of feeding, rumination, and lying behaviors. Primiparous (n=24) and multiparous (n=24) lactating Holstein dairy cattle (mean ± standard deviation; 223.4±117.8 d in milk, producing 29.2±8.2kg of milk/d) were fitted with 6 different triaxial accelerometer technologies evaluating cow behaviors at or before freshening. The AfiAct Pedometer Plus (Afimilk, Kibbutz Afikim, Israel) was used to monitor lying time. The CowManager SensOor (Agis, Harmelen, Netherlands) monitored rumination and feeding time. The HOBO Data Logger (HOBO Pendant G Acceleration Data Logger, Onset Computer Corp., Pocasset, MA) monitored lying time. The CowAlert IceQube (IceRobotics Ltd., Edinburgh, Scotland) monitored lying time. The Smartbow (Smartbow GmbH, Jutogasse, Austria) monitored rumination time. The Track A Cow (ENGS, Rosh Pina, Israel) monitored lying time and time spent around feeding areas for the calculation of feeding time. Over 8 d, 6 cows per day were visually observed for feeding, rumination, and lying behaviors for 2 h after morning and evening milking. The time of day was recorded when each behavior began and ended. These times were used to generate the length of time behaviors were visually observed. Pearson correlations (r; calculated using the CORR procedure of SAS Version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), and concordance correlations (CCC; calculated using the epiR package of R version 3.1.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) evaluated association between visual observations and technology-recorded behaviors. Visually recorded feeding behaviors were moderately correlated with the CowManager SensOor (r=0.88, CCC=0.82) and Track A Cow (r=0.93, CCC=0.79) monitors. Visually recorded rumination behaviors were strongly correlated with the Smartbow (r=0.97, CCC=0.96), and weakly correlated with the CowManager SensOor (r=0.69, CCC=0.59). Visually recorded lying behaviors were strongly correlated with the AfiAct Pedometer Plus (r >0.99, CCC >0.99), CowAlert IceQube (r >0.99, CCC >0.99), and Track A Cow (r >0.99, CCC >0.99). The HOBO Data Loggers were moderately correlated (r >0.83, CCC >0.81) with visual observations. Based on these results, the evaluated precision dairy monitoring technologies accurately monitored dairy cattle behavior.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feeding behavior; lying behavior; precision dairy monitoring; ruminating behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423949     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  20 in total

1.  Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring individual behavior in beef heifers.

Authors:  Victória R Merenda; Odinei Marques; Emily K Miller-Cushon; Nicolas Dilorenzo; Jimena Laporta; Ricardo C Chebel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Industry 4.0 and Precision Livestock Farming (PLF): An up to Date Overview across Animal Productions.

Authors:  Sarah Morrone; Corrado Dimauro; Filippo Gambella; Maria Grazia Cappai
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Using Sensor Data to Detect Lameness and Mastitis Treatment Events in Dairy Cows: A Comparison of Classification Models.

Authors:  Christian Post; Christian Rietz; Wolfgang Büscher; Ute Müller
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Development and validation of an ensemble classifier for real-time recognition of cow behavior patterns from accelerometer data and location data.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Zhitao He; Guoqiang Zheng; Song Gao; Kaixuan Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation and application potential of an accelerometer-based collar device for measuring grazing behavior of dairy cows.

Authors:  J Werner; C Umstatter; L Leso; E Kennedy; A Geoghegan; L Shalloo; M Schick; B O'Brien
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Monitoring and Improving the Metabolic Health of Dairy Cows during the Transition Period.

Authors:  Luciano S Caixeta; Bobwealth O Omontese
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Evaluation of the FitBark Activity Monitor for Measuring Physical Activity in Dogs.

Authors:  Jessica Colpoys; Dean DeCock
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Combination of Sensor Data and Health Monitoring for Early Detection of Subclinical Ketosis in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Valentin Sturm; Dmitry Efrosinin; Manfred Öhlschuster; Erika Gusterer; Marc Drillich; Michael Iwersen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  The effect of an organic rumen-protected fat supplement on performance, metabolic status, and health of dairy cows.

Authors:  Diego Manriquez; Liang Chen; Pedro Melendez; Pablo Pinedo
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Prepartum change in ventral tail base surface temperature in beef cattle: comparison with vaginal temperature and behavior indices, and effect of ambient temperature.

Authors:  Masafumi Miwa; Shuichi Matsuyama; Sho Nakamura; Kohei Noda; Miki Sakatani
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.