Literature DB >> 27423367

Ambulatory Status Protects against Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke Patients.

Jason-Flor V Sisante1, Michael G Abraham2, Milind A Phadnis3, Sandra A Billinger1, Manoj K Mittal4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ischemic stroke patients are at high risk (up to 18%) for venous thromboembolism. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to understand the predictors of acute postmild ischemic stroke patient's ambulatory status and its relationship with venous thromboembolism, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.
METHODS: We identified 522 patients between February 2006 and May 2014 and collected data about patient demographics, admission NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, ambulatory status, diagnosis of venous thromboembolism, and hospital outcomes (length of stay, mortality). Chi-square test, t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis as appropriate.
RESULTS: A total of 61 (11.7%), 48 (9.2%), and 23 (4.4%) mild ischemic stroke patients developed venous thromboembolism, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, respectively. During hospitalization, 281 (53.8%) patients were ambulatory. Independent predictors of in-hospital ambulation were being married (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.10-2.49), being nonreligious (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.34-3.62), admission NIHSS (per unit decrease in NIHSS; OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.39-1.91), and nonuse of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.02-2.61). After adjusting for confounders, ambulatory patients had lower rates of venous thromboembolism (OR .47, 95% CI .25-.89), deep venous thrombosis (OR .36, 95% CI .17-.73), prolonged length of hospital stay (OR .24, 95% CI .16-.37), and mortality (OR .43, 95% CI .21-.84).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that for hospitalized acute mild ischemic stroke patients, ambulatory status is an independent predictor of venous thromboembolism (specifically deep venous thrombosis), hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.
Copyright © 2016 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ischemic stroke; ambulation; ambulatory status; deep vein thrombosis; odds ratio; protection; pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423367      PMCID: PMC5201103          DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  23 in total

1.  Use of Accelerometers to Examine Sedentary Time on an Acute Stroke Unit.

Authors:  Anna E Mattlage; Sara A Redlin; Michael A Rippee; Michael G Abraham; Marilyn M Rymer; Sandra A Billinger
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Thalia S Field; Michael D Hill
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 3.  The vascular conducted response in cerebral blood flow regulation.

Authors:  Lars Jørn Jensen; Niels-Henrik Holstein-Rathlou
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Change in productive activity in late adulthood: MacArthur studies of successful aging.

Authors:  T A Glass; T E Seeman; A R Herzog; R Kahn; L F Berkman
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Venous thromboembolism after acute ischemic stroke: a prospective study using magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging.

Authors:  J Kelly; A Rudd; R R Lewis; C Coshall; A Moody; B J Hunt
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Frederick A Anderson; Frederick A Spencer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care.

Authors:  Julie Bernhardt; Helen Dewey; Amanda Thrift; Geoffrey Donnan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Does evidence really matter? Professionals' opinions on the practice of early mobilization after stroke.

Authors:  Anna Sjöholm; Monica Skarin; Thomas Linden; Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-10-25
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Association Between Stroke Mortality and Time of Admission and Participation in a Telestroke Network.

Authors:  Brian Witrick; Donglan Zhang; Jeffrey A Switzer; David C Hess; Lu Shi
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  The efficacy of the figure-of-eight suture technique in the treatment of tunnel bleeding of the femoral artery route after percutaneous coronary intervention or angiography.

Authors:  Ya Huang; Jing-Guo Nong; Qiao Xue; Quan-Zhou Feng; Cai-Yi Lu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.