Literature DB >> 27423147

Cost and Effectiveness of Commercially Available Nesting Substrates for Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus).

Tara L Martin1, Shannon R Balser1, Gregory S Young2, Stephanie D Lewis3.   

Abstract

Provision of nesting material promotes species-typical behaviors in rodents including deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). The purpose of this study was to determine which commercially available nesting material best promotes complex nest building in the subspecies P. m. bairdii yet remains cost-effective for use as enrichment in a laboratory research setting. An existing breeding colony consisting of cages containing all male mice, all female mice, and breeding pairs was evaluated. Five commercially available substrates-compressed cotton squares, cylindrical compressed cotton, cellulose bedding containing small pieces of evenly dispersed compressed paper, brown crinkled paper, and white crinkled paper-were provided according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Nests were evaluated at 24 h after cage change and scored for complexity. Nest complexity was compared between breeding pairs and single-sex cages and between male and female mice. Cages housing breeding pairs with pups had the highest average complexity score. The dispersed paper substrate was the least expensive substrate tested but had the lowest average nest complexity score. Nesting scores for brown crinkled paper, compressed cotton squares, and compressed cotton cylinders did not differ significantly despite the range in cost. Brown crinkled paper was the second least-expensive substrate tested, and mice used it to build consistently complex nests, making it the most practical substrate for use as enrichment for deer mice in a laboratory setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423147      PMCID: PMC4943611     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  24 in total

1.  Development of spontaneous stereotyped behavior in deer mice: effects of early and late exposure to a more complex environment.

Authors:  S B Powell; H A Newman; T A McDonald; P Bugenhagen; M H Lewis
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.038

2.  Evolution of monogamy, paternal investment, and female life history in Peromyscus.

Authors:  Eldin Jašarević; Drew H Bailey; Janet P Crossland; Wallace D Dawson; Gabor Szalai; Mark R Ellersieck; Cheryl S Rosenfeld; David C Geary
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Preferences for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice.

Authors:  H A Van de Weerd; P L Van Loo; L F Van Zutphen; J M Koolhaas; V Baumans
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 4.  Modifications to husbandry and housing conditions of laboratory rodents for improved well-being.

Authors:  Abigail L Smith; Dorcas J Corrow
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

5.  Photoperiod and reproduction in female deer mice.

Authors:  J M Whitsett; L L Miller
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Copulatory behavior and nest building behavior of wild house mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  D Q Estep; D L Lanier; D A Dewsbury
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1975-11

7.  Assessment of the use of two commercially available environmental enrichments by laboratory mice by preference testing.

Authors:  Pascalle L P Van Loo; Harry J M Blom; Margot K Meijer; Vera Baumans
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.471

8.  Home improvement: C57BL/6J mice given more naturalistic nesting materials build better nests.

Authors:  Sarah E Hess; Stephanie Rohr; Brett D Dufour; Brianna N Gaskill; Edmond A Pajor; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Impact of nesting material on mouse body temperature and physiology.

Authors:  Brianna N Gaskill; Christopher J Gordon; Edmond A Pajor; Jeffrey R Lucas; Jerry K Davis; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-01-08

10.  Energy reallocation to breeding performance through improved nest building in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Brianna N Gaskill; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning; Christopher J Gordon; Edmond A Pajor; Jeffrey R Lucas; Jerry K Davis; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Phenotyping Young GluA1 Deficient Mice - A Behavioral Characterization in a Genetic Loss-of-Function Model.

Authors:  Maria Reiber; Helen Stirling; Rolf Sprengel; Peter Gass; Rupert Palme; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Influence of Lab Adapted Natural Diet and Microbiota on Life History and Metabolic Phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Andrei Bombin; Owen Cunneely; Kira Eickman; Sergei Bombin; Abigail Ruesy; Mengting Su; Abigail Myers; Rachael Cowan; Laura Reed
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-12-11

3.  Development of behavioral patterns in young C57BL/6J mice: a home cage-based study.

Authors:  Maria Reiber; Ines Koska; Claudia Pace; Katharina Schönhoff; Lara von Schumann; Rupert Palme; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.