Literature DB >> 23313562

Impact of nesting material on mouse body temperature and physiology.

Brianna N Gaskill1, Christopher J Gordon, Edmond A Pajor, Jeffrey R Lucas, Jerry K Davis, Joseph P Garner.   

Abstract

In laboratories, mice are housed at 20-24 °C, which is below their lower critical temperature (≈30 °C). Thus, mice are potentially cold stressed, which can alter metabolism, immune function, and reproduction. These physiological changes reflect impaired wellbeing, and affect scientific outcomes. We hypothesized that nesting material would allow mice to alleviate cold stress by controlling their thermal microenvironment, thus insulating them, reducing heat loss and thermogenic processes. Naïve C57BL/6, CD-1, and BALB/c mice (24 male and 24 female/strain in groups of 3) were housed in standard cages at 20 °C either with or without 8 g nesting material for 4 weeks. Core body temperature was followed using intraperitoneal radio telemetry. The thermal properties of the nests were assessed using a thermal imaging camera, and related to nest quality. Higher scoring nests were negatively correlated with the mean radiated temperature and were thus more insulating. No effects of nesting material on body temperature were found. CD-1 mice with nesting material had higher end body weights than controls. No effect was seen in the other two strains. Mice with the telemetry implant had larger spleens than controls, possibly indicating an immune response to the implant or low level infection from the surgery. BALB/c mice express less mRNA for the UCP1 protein than mice without nesting material. This indicates that BALB/c's with nesting material do not utilize their brown fat to create heat as readily as controls. Nests can alleviate thermal discomfort by decreasing the amount of radiated heat and reduce the need for non-shivering thermogenesis. However, different strains appear to use different behavioral (through different primary modes of behavioral thermoregulation) and physiological strategies (utilizing thermogenesis to different degrees) to maintain a constant body temperature under cool standard laboratory ambient temperatures.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23313562     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  62 in total

1.  Impact of Environmental Enrichment Devices on NTP In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Sheba R Churchill; Daniel L Morgan; Grace E Kissling; Gregory S Travlos; Angela P King-Herbert
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 2.  Mild cold-stress depresses immune responses: Implications for cancer models involving laboratory mice.

Authors:  Michelle N Messmer; Kathleen M Kokolus; Jason W-L Eng; Scott I Abrams; Elizabeth A Repasky
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Stressed out: providing laboratory animals with behavioral control to reduce the physiological effects of stress.

Authors:  Brianna N Gaskill; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 4.  Effects of Rodent Thermoregulation on Animal Models in the Research Environment.

Authors:  F Claire Hankenson; James O Marx; Christopher J Gordon; John M David
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Letter-to-the-editor on "Not so hot: Optimal housing temperatures for mice to mimic the thermal environment of humans".

Authors:  Brianna N Gaskill; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.422

Review 6.  Nutrition and energetics in rodent longevity research.

Authors:  Victoria K Gibbs; Daniel L Smith
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 4.032

7.  The time-to-integrate-to-nest test as an indicator of wellbeing in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Meagan L Rock; Alicia Z Karas; Katherine B Gartrell Rodriguez; Miranda S Gallo; Kathleen Pritchett-Corning; Richard H Karas; Mark Aronovitz; Brianna N Gaskill
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Individually ventilated cages impose cold stress on laboratory mice: a source of systemic experimental variability.

Authors:  John M David; Scott Knowles; Donald M Lamkin; David B Stout
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Out Like a Light? The Effects of a Diurnal Husbandry Schedule on Mouse Sleep and Behavior.

Authors:  Amy L Robinson-Junker; Bruce F O'hara; Brianna N Gaskill
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  The hidden cost of housing practices: using noninvasive imaging to quantify the metabolic demands of chronic cold stress of laboratory mice.

Authors:  John M David; Arion F Chatziioannou; Richard Taschereau; Hongkai Wang; David B Stout
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.