Literature DB >> 27422807

Both short-term and long-term dermoscopy monitoring is useful in detecting melanoma in patients with multiple atypical nevi.

E Moscarella1, I Tion2, I Zalaudek3, A Lallas1, A Kyrgidis1, C Longo1, M Lombardi1, M Raucci1, R Satta2, R Alfano4, G Argenziano5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital dermoscopy monitoring (DDM) is an effective strategy for melanoma detection. Two methods are currently employed. Short-term follow-up (STFU) for the evaluation of single, atypical lesions to detect subtle changes over a short period of time (3-6 months). Long-term follow-up (LTFU) is recommended for patients with multiple nevi. Although a study demonstrated that STFU improves the patients' compliance for DDM, little remains known about the impact and reliability of STFU in this setting.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate the impact and reliability of a schedule combining STFU and LTFU in patients with multiple atypical nevi.
METHODS: We searched our database for all cases of patients with multiple atypical nevi occurring between 2006 and 2014.
RESULTS: A total of 3823 lesions in 541 patients were dermoscopically monitored (mean number = 7 lesions per patient; median = 6 lesions; range, 2-51). In all, 264 (6.9%) lesions in 184 (34.4%) patients were excised (mean of 0.5 lesions per patient). In total, 197 (74.6%) lesions were excised at follow-up, with melanomas representing 30.5% of lesions excised after follow-up. A total of 30 (33.3%) melanomas were excised at baseline, 23 (25.6%) after STFU and 37 (41.1%) after LTFU. There was no difference in the number of in situ melanomas detected at baseline with those detected after follow-up. The mean Breslow thickness of melanomas detected at baseline was higher than those detected after STFU (P = 0.038) and LTFU (P = 0.055).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirm that digital dermoscopy follow-up is a valid management strategy for patients with multiple atypical nevi, with short-term monitoring playing an effective role also in this setting of patients.
© 2016 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27422807     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  5 in total

Review 1.  Dermoscopic Criteria, Histopathological Correlates and Genetic Findings of Thin Melanoma on Non-Volar Skin.

Authors:  Cesare Massone; Rainer Hofman-Wellenhof; Stefano Chiodi; Simona Sola
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Dermoscopy of a Spark's nevus.

Authors:  Giovanni Biondo; Matteo Gnone; Simona Sola; Carlotta Pastorino; Cesare Massone
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-04-30

3.  Sequential digital dermatoscopic imaging of patients with multiple atypical nevi.

Authors:  Philipp Tschandl
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-07-31

4.  Digital dermatoscopy as a useful tool for evaluating therapeutic efficacy in a patient with eruptive keratoacanthomas.

Authors:  Ruzica Jurakic Toncic; Sandra Jerkovic Gulin; Jaka Rados; Daska Stulhofer Buzina; Kresimir Kostovic; Giuseppe Argenziano
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-07-31

5.  A patient-centric dataset of images and metadata for identifying melanomas using clinical context.

Authors:  Veronica Rotemberg; Nicholas Kurtansky; Brigid Betz-Stablein; Liam Caffery; Emmanouil Chousakos; Noel Codella; Marc Combalia; Stephen Dusza; Pascale Guitera; David Gutman; Allan Halpern; Brian Helba; Harald Kittler; Kivanc Kose; Steve Langer; Konstantinos Lioprys; Josep Malvehy; Shenara Musthaq; Jabpani Nanda; Ofer Reiter; George Shih; Alexander Stratigos; Philipp Tschandl; Jochen Weber; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 6.444

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.