Literature DB >> 27420570

The Virtual Physiological Human: Ten Years After.

Marco Viceconti1, Peter Hunter2.   

Abstract

Biomedical research and clinical practice are struggling to cope with the growing complexity that the progress of health care involves. The most challenging diseases, those with the largest socioeconomic impact (cardiovascular conditions; musculoskeletal conditions; cancer; metabolic, immunity, and neurodegenerative conditions), are all characterized by a complex genotype-phenotype interaction and by a "systemic" nature that poses a challenge to the traditional reductionist approach. In 2005 a small group of researchers discussed how the vision of computational physiology promoted by the Physiome Project could be translated into clinical practice and formally proposed the term Virtual Physiological Human. Our knowledge about these diseases is fragmentary, as it is associated with molecular and cellular processes on the one hand and with tissue and organ phenotype changes (related to clinical symptoms of disease conditions) on the other. The problem could be solved if we could capture all these fragments of knowledge into predictive models and then compose them into hypermodels that help us tame the complexity that such systemic behavior involves. In 2005 this was simply not possible-the necessary methods and technologies were not available. Now, 10 years later, it seems the right time to reflect on the original vision, the results achieved so far, and what remains to be done.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Virtual Physiological Human; computational physiology; in silico medicine; physiome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27420570     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110915-114742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng        ISSN: 1523-9829            Impact factor:   9.590


  12 in total

1.  Mesh-to-raster region-of-interest-based nonrigid registration of multimodal images.

Authors:  Rosalia Tatano; Benjamin Berkels; Thomas M Deserno
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-27

2.  Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Alejandro F Frangi; Sotirios A Tsaftaris; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Computational Modeling: Diversity of Personalization and Challenges.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; Pras Pathmanathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Effect of Heart Structure on Ventricular Fibrillation in the Rabbit: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Suran K Galappaththige; Pras Pathmanathan; Martin J Bishop; Richard A Gray
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Securing the future of research computing in the biosciences.

Authors:  Joanna Leng; Massa Shoura; Tom C B McLeish; Alan N Real; Mariann Hardey; James McCafferty; Neil A Ranson; Sarah A Harris
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Precision Medicine in Interventional Cardiology.

Authors:  Thijmen W Hokken; Joana M Ribeiro; Peter P De Jaegere; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 8.  UPMaBoSS: A Novel Framework for Dynamic Cell Population Modeling.

Authors:  Gautier Stoll; Aurélien Naldi; Vincent Noël; Eric Viara; Emmanuel Barillot; Guido Kroemer; Denis Thieffry; Laurence Calzone
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-02

Review 9.  In silico cancer research towards 3R.

Authors:  Claire Jean-Quartier; Fleur Jeanquartier; Igor Jurisica; Andreas Holzinger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats.

Authors:  Fabian Philipp Kreutzer; Anna Meinecke; Kevin Schmidt; Jan Fiedler; Thomas Thum
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 10.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.