Literature DB >> 27420405

Outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma with TP53 deletion after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Sameh Gaballa1, Rima M Saliba1, Samer Srour1, Gary Lu2, Jonathan E Brammer1, Nina Shah1, Qaiser Bashir1, Krina Patel1, Fabian Bock1, Simrit Parmar1, Chitra Hosing1, Uday Popat1, Ruby Delgado1, Gabriela Rondon1, Jatin J Shah3, Elisabet E Manasanch3, Robert Z Orlowski3, Richard Champlin1, Muzaffar H Qazilbash4.   

Abstract

TP53 gene deletion is associated with poor outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM). We report the outcomes of patients with MM with and without TP53 deletion who underwent immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and/or proteasome inhibitor (PI) induction followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HCT). We identified 34 patients with MM and TP53 deletion who underwent IMiD and/or PI induction followed by auto-HCT at our institution during 2008-2014. We compared their outcomes with those of control patients (n = 111) with MM without TP53 deletion. Median age at auto-HCT was 59 years in the TP53-deletion group and 58 years in the control group (P = 0.4). Twenty-one patients (62%) with TP53 deletion and 69 controls (62%) achieved at least partial remission before auto-HCT (P = 0.97). Twenty-three patients (68%) with TP53 deletion and 47 controls (42%) had relapsed disease at auto-HCT (P = 0.01). Median progression-free survival was 8 months for patients with TP53 deletion and 28 months for controls (P < 0.001). Median overall survival was 21 months for patients with TP53 deletion and 56 months for controls (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis of both groups, TP53 deletion (hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.9-5.8, P < 0.001) and relapsed disease at auto-HCT (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.4, P = 0.008) were associated with a higher risk of earlier progression. In MM patients treated with PI and/or IMiD drugs, and auto-HCT, TP53 deletion and relapsed disease at the time of auto-HCT are independent predictors of progression. Novel approaches should be evaluated in this high-risk population. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E442-E447, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27420405      PMCID: PMC5031524          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  33 in total

1.  How I treat high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Sagar Lonial; Lawrence H Boise; Jonathan Kaufman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 trial.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Bronno van der Holt; Laila El Jarari; Uta Bertsch; Hans Salwender; Sonja Zweegman; Edo Vellenga; Annemiek Broyl; Igor W Blau; Katja C Weisel; Shulamiet Wittebol; Gerard M J Bos; Marian Stevens-Kroef; Christof Scheid; Michael Pfreundschuh; Dirk Hose; Anna Jauch; Helgi van der Velde; Reinier Raymakers; Martijn R Schaafsma; Marie-Jose Kersten; Marinus van Marwijk-Kooy; Ulrich Duehrsen; Walter Lindemann; Pierre W Wijermans; Henk M Lokhorst; Hartmut M Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Delineation of distinct subgroups of multiple myeloma and a model for clonal evolution based on interphase cytogenetics.

Authors:  Friedrich W Cremer; Jelena Bila; Isabelle Buck; Mutlu Kartal; Dirk Hose; Carina Ittrich; Axel Benner; Marc S Raab; Ann-Cathrin Theil; Marion Moos; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Claus R Bartram; Anna Jauch
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Nonparametric estimation of lifetime and disease onset distributions from incomplete observations.

Authors:  G E Dinse; S W Lagakos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Plasma cell enrichment enhances detection of high-risk cytogenomic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization and improves risk stratification of patients with plasma cell neoplasms.

Authors:  Gary Lu; Ramya Muddasani; Robert Z Orlowski; Lynne V Abruzzo; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; M James You; Yaping Wang; Ming Zhao; Su Chen; Isabella Claudia Glitza; L Jeffrey Medeiros
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells against CD19 for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Alfred L Garfall; Marcela V Maus; Wei-Ting Hwang; Simon F Lacey; Yolanda D Mahnke; J Joseph Melenhorst; Zhaohui Zheng; Dan T Vogl; Adam D Cohen; Brendan M Weiss; Karen Dengel; Naseem D S Kerr; Adam Bagg; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June; Edward A Stadtmauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study.

Authors:  Michele Cavo; Paola Tacchetti; Francesca Patriarca; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Lucia Pantani; Monica Galli; Francesco Di Raimondo; Claudia Crippa; Elena Zamagni; Antonio Palumbo; Massimo Offidani; Paolo Corradini; Franco Narni; Antonio Spadano; Norbert Pescosta; Giorgio Lambertenghi Deliliers; Antonio Ledda; Claudia Cellini; Tommaso Caravita; Patrizia Tosi; Michele Baccarani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Benefit of complete response in multiple myeloma limited to high-risk subgroup identified by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Jeffrey Haessler; John D Shaughnessy; Fenghuang Zhan; John Crowley; Joshua Epstein; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Maurizio Zangari; Klaus Hollmig; Abid Mohiuddin; Yazan Alsayed; Antje Hoering; Guido Tricot; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma.

Authors:  Aaron P Rapoport; Edward A Stadtmauer; Gwendolyn K Binder-Scholl; Olga Goloubeva; Dan T Vogl; Simon F Lacey; Ashraf Z Badros; Alfred Garfall; Brendan Weiss; Jeffrey Finklestein; Irina Kulikovskaya; Sanjoy K Sinha; Shari Kronsberg; Minnal Gupta; Sarah Bond; Luca Melchiori; Joanna E Brewer; Alan D Bennett; Andrew B Gerry; Nicholas J Pumphrey; Daniel Williams; Helen K Tayton-Martin; Lilliam Ribeiro; Tom Holdich; Saul Yanovich; Nancy Hardy; Jean Yared; Naseem Kerr; Sunita Philip; Sandra Westphal; Don L Siegel; Bruce L Levine; Bent K Jakobsen; Michael Kalos; Carl H June
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Inhibition of the MDM2 E3 Ligase induces apoptosis and autophagy in wild-type and mutant p53 models of multiple myeloma, and acts synergistically with ABT-737.

Authors:  Dongmin Gu; Shuhong Wang; Isere Kuiatse; Hua Wang; Jin He; Yun Dai; Richard J Jones; Chad C Bjorklund; Jing Yang; Steven Grant; Robert Z Orlowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comprehensive CRISPR-Cas9 screens identify genetic determinants of drug responsiveness in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Stephan R Bohl; Laura K Schmalbrock; Imke Bauhuf; Tatjana Meyer; Anna Dolnik; Martin Szyska; Tamara J Blätte; Sarah Knödler; Linda Röhner; Denise Miller; Miriam Kull; Christian Langer; Hartmut Döhner; Anthony Letai; Frederik Damm; Dirk Heckl; Lars Bullinger; Jan Krönke
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 2.  Management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: novel agents, antibodies, immunotherapies and beyond.

Authors:  C S Chim; S K Kumar; R Z Orlowski; G Cook; P G Richardson; M A Gertz; S Giralt; M V Mateos; X Leleu; K C Anderson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  A Network Analysis of Multiple Myeloma Related Gene Signatures.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Haocheng Yu; Seungyeul Yoo; Eunjee Lee; Alessandro Laganà; Samir Parekh; Eric E Schadt; Li Wang; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Prognosis, Biology, and Targeting of TP53 Dysregulation in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Erin Flynt; Kamlesh Bisht; Vinidhra Sridharan; María Ortiz; Fadi Towfic; Anjan Thakurta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Potent anti-myeloma activity of the TOPK inhibitor OTS514 in pre-clinical models.

Authors:  Andrew T Stefka; David Johnson; Shaun Rosebeck; Jae-Hyun Park; Yusuke Nakamura; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Clinical Significance of TP53 Abnormalities in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Authors:  Fang Ye; Tongtong Wang; Aijun Liu; Yanchen Li; Ningning Li; Huan Wang; Wenming Chen
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 1.831

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.