Literature DB >> 18056185

Benefit of complete response in multiple myeloma limited to high-risk subgroup identified by gene expression profiling.

Jeffrey Haessler1, John D Shaughnessy, Fenghuang Zhan, John Crowley, Joshua Epstein, Frits van Rhee, Elias Anaissie, Mauricio Pineda-Roman, Maurizio Zangari, Klaus Hollmig, Abid Mohiuddin, Yazan Alsayed, Antje Hoering, Guido Tricot, Bart Barlogie.   

Abstract

EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: To determine whether the clinical benefit of complete remission (CR) may depend on prognostic subgroups of patients with multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with myeloma received a tandem autotransplant regimen. Using multivariate regression analyses, we examined the prognostic implications of time-dependent onset of CR on overall survival and event-free survival in the context of standard prognostic factors (SPF) and gene expression profiling-derived data available for 326 patients.
RESULTS: CR benefited patients regardless of risk status when only SPFs were examined. With knowledge of gene array data, a survival (and event-free survival) benefit of CR only pertained to the small high-risk subgroup of 13% of patients (hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.001), whereas the majority of patients with low-risk disease had similar survival expectations whether or not CR was achieved (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = 0.128).
CONCLUSIONS: Access to gene expression information permitted the recognition of a small very high-risk subgroup of 13% of patients, in whom prolonged survival critically depended on achieving CR. Absence of such benefit in the remainder should lead to a reassessment of clinical trial designs that rely on this end point as a surrogate for long-term prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056185     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

1.  A case of aggressive myeloma recognized shortly after the remission following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Kaname Ueda; Katsuhiro Miura; Yoshihiro Hatta; Sumiko Kobayashi; Toshitake Tanaka; Atsuko Hojo; Hikaru Ishizuka; Umihiko Sawada; Yoshimasa Kura; Jin Takeuchi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  A View from the Plateau: Is There a Role for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of Highly Effective Therapies for Multiple Myeloma?

Authors:  Damian J Green; William I Bensinger
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Suppression of abnormal karyotype predicts superior survival in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  V Arzoumanian; A Hoering; J Sawyer; F van Rhee; C Bailey; J Gurley; J D Shaughnessy; E Anaissie; J Crowley; B Barlogie
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Revised International Staging System Is Predictive and Prognostic for Early Relapse (<24 months) after Autologous Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Sathish Gopalakrishnan; Anita D'Souza; Emma Scott; Raphael Fraser; Omar Davila; Nina Shah; Robert Peter Gale; Rammurti Kamble; Miguel Angel Diaz; Hillard M Lazarus; Bipin N Savani; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Melhem Solh; Cesar O Freytes; Cindy Lee; Robert A Kyle; Saad Z Usmani; Siddhartha Ganguly; Amer Assal; Jesus Berdeja; Abraham S Kanate; Binod Dhakal; Kenneth Meehan; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Ayman Saad; Frederick Locke; Sachiko Seo; Taiga Nishihori; Usama Gergis; Cristina Gasparetto; Tomer Mark; Yago Nieto; Shaji Kumar; Parameswaran Hari
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Current Review on High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Henry S H Chan; Christine I Chen; Donna E Reece
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 6.  The future of autologous stem cell transplantation in myeloma.

Authors:  Frits van Rhee; Sergio Giralt; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Joseph R Mikhael; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Suzanne R Hayman; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Kristen E Detweiler Short; A Keith Stewart; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; S Vincent Rajkumar; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Complete remission in multiple myeloma examined as time-dependent variable in terms of both onset and duration in Total Therapy protocols.

Authors:  Antje Hoering; John Crowley; John D Shaughnessy; Klaus Hollmig; Yazan Alsayed; Jackie Szymonifka; Sarah Waheed; Bijay Nair; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Treatment of myeloma: cure vs control.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.