Literature DB >> 27419198

Data describing the solution structure of the WW3* domain from human Nedd4-1.

Vineet Panwalkar1, Marianne Schulte2, Justin Lecher2, Matthias Stoldt2, Dieter Willbold2, Andrew J Dingley1.   

Abstract

The third WW domain (WW3*) of human Nedd4-1 (Neuronal precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated gene 4-1) interacts with the poly-proline (PY) motifs of the human epithelial Na+ channel (hENaC) subunits at micromolar affinity. This data supplements the article (Panwalkar et al., 2015) [1]. We describe the NMR experiments used to solve the solution structure of the WW3* domain. We also present NOE network data for defining the rotameric state of side chains of peptide binding residues, and complement this data with χ 1 dihedral angles derived from (3) J couplings and molecular dynamics simulations data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical shift; NMR; NOE distance restraints; Neuronal precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated gene 4-1; WW domain

Year:  2016        PMID: 27419198      PMCID: PMC4936499          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data The NOE network defines clearly the side chain orientations of particular ligand-binding residues; MD simulations provide atomistic descriptions of conformational fluctuations within the WW3* domain that are not observed in the NMR-derived structure of the domain; This data set serves as a reference for future studies involving WW domains.

Data

We have collected 1592 NOE distance restraints from three-dimensional 15N-edited and 13C-edited NOESY spectra, which were processed using NMRPipe [2] and analyzed using CcpNMR Analysis [3]. The NOE dataset consists of 390 sequential, 416 intra-residue, 266 medium-range and 256 long-range NOE distance restraints. In addition, 60 dihedral angle restraints and five sidechain χ1 angle restraints determined from combined 3Jαβ and 3JNβ couplings were used for structure calculation. The NOEs were picked manually and assigned in a semi-automated manner using the Aria 2.3.1 [4] software package. The structure calculation was carried out by a combination of Aria 2.3.1 and CNS version 1.21 [5] using the PARALLHDG force field. The protocol employed by Aria for calculation of the solution structure of the WW3* domain is provided as supplementary material. The experiments performed to acquire chemical shift assignments, 3J couplings and NOE distance restraints are summarized in Table 1. The 3J couplings and the subsequently determined rotameric state for the WW3* domain are given in Table 2.
Table 1

NMR experiments used for structure determination.

ExperimentSweep width (ppm)Data matricesChemical shift offset (ppm)Number of scansRecycle delay (s)Time (h)
Backbone assignmentsa
3D HNCO16 (H)×32 (N)×13 (C)1024* (H)×32* (N)×40* (C)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×175.2 (C)81.115
3D HNCA12.5 (H)×29 (N)×28 (C)1024* (H)×42* (N)×64* (C)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×56.8 (C)81.128
3D CBCA(CO)NH16 (H)×32 (N)×50 (C)1024* (H)×32* (N)×48* (C)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×50 (C)81.138



Side chain assignments
3D H(CCO)NH14 (H)×32 (N)×7.5 (H)1024* (H)×24* (N)× 64* (C)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×3.0 (H)161.138
3D CC(CO)NH14 (H)×32 (N)×70 (C)1024* (H)×42* (N)× 64* (C)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×42 (C)161.157
3D 15N-edited TOCSY12.5 (H)×32 (N)×12.5 (H)1024* (H)×20* (N)×50* (H)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×4.7 (H)161.124
3D HCCH-TOCSY6.5 (H)×74 (C)×6.5 (H)512* (H)×38* (C)×100* (H)3.2 (H)×45.2 (C)×1.5 (H)161.190
2D (HB)CB(CGCD)HD15 (H)×33 (C)750* (H)×32* (C)4.7 (H)×35 (C)321.51
2D (HB)CB(CGCDDE)HE15 (H)×33 (C)750* (H)×32* (C)4.7 (H)×35 (C)321.51



Distance restraints
3D 15N-edited NOESY15 (H)×27 (N)×12.5 (H)1024* (H)×46* (N) ×128* (H)4.7 (H)×119 (N)×4.7 (H)81.280
3D 13C-edited NOESY14 (H)×38 (C)×6 (H)768* (H)×94* (C)×73* (H)4.7 (H)×29 (C)×2.8 (H)161.1161
3D 13C-edited NOESY(aromatic region)14 (H)×23 (C)×6 (H)832* (H)×36* (C)×50* (H)4.7 (H)×123.4 (C)×7.3 (H)161.143



Dihedral restraints
3D HNHB12.5 (H)×32 (N)×12.5 (H)1024* (H)×21* (N)×64* (H)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×4.7 (H)161.235
3D HAHBCACONH12.5 (H)×32 (N)×12.5 (H)1024* (H)×10* (N)×61* (H)4.7 (H)×117.1 (N)×2.7 (H)1281.2134

NMR backbone and side chain spectra as well as 3J data were recorded at 600 MHz, whereas distance restraint experiments were recorded at 900 MHz.

Table 2

3J couplings and the subsequently derived side chain rotamer used in structure determination of the WW3* domain.

Residue3Jcoupling (Hz)
χ1angle
3JNβ3J αβ
N4342.15±0.89, 3.64 ±0.503.42±1.02, 4.38 ±0.79gauche-
D4410.58±0.19, 0.95 ±0.12N.D., N.D.trans
H4424.07±0.09, 1.73 ±0.223.06a, 11.14±1.19gauche+
D4511.15±0.11, 0.85 ±0.15N.D., N.D.trans
R4531.43±0.09, 0.85 ±0.154.12 ±1.06, 10.31±0.37gauche+

N.D. Not determined

upper limit value for the 3J coupling.

We provide, as examples, the NOE networks for two key peptide binding residues I440 and T447 (Fig. 1, Fig. 2), side chain rotamers of which differ between NMR and the crystal structures [6]. MD simulations data of χ1 rotameric states of six key peptide binding residues (R430, F438, I440, H442, T447 and W449) over 100 ns in the apo and hENaC peptide bound state of the WW3* domain is provided (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1

Strips from a 13C-edited NOESY spectrum for the δ1 methyl protons (A) and the γ2 methyl protons (B) of the residue I440 of the WW3* domain are shown. The 13C chemical shifts are shown at the top of each strip. The NOE network that gives rise to the trans rotamer for I440 is mapped onto the structure (C). The γ2 methyl protons show NOEs to the β and γ protons of E428 as well as the δ protons of R430 (red dashed lines in Fig. 1C). The δ1 methyl protons of I440 do not show NOEs to E428 and R430 but show NOEs to the amide proton and the α proton of H442 (black dashed lines in Fig. 1C). This NOE pattern defines the side chain conformation of I440.

Fig. 2

Strips from a 13C-edited NOESY spectrum for the β proton (A) and the γ2 methyl protons (B) of the residue T337 of the WW3* domain are shown. The NOE network that gives rise to a gauche+ rotamer is mapped onto the structure (C). This NOE pattern defines the side chain conformation of T447.

Fig. 3

Plots of side chain rotameric states for key peptide binding residues (R430, F438, I440, H442, T447 and W449) observed over 100 ns MD simulations of the apo- and hENaC peptide bound forms of the WW3* domain are shown.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Protein expression, purification and NMR sample preparation

The WW3* domain (41 residues, 4.8 kDa) from neuronal precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated gene 4-1 (Nedd4-1) was overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3)pLysS cells, as described previously [7], [8]. Protein purification was performed as described previously [1], [7], [8].

NMR spectroscopy

Standard heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments [9] were performed on samples containing 1.5–1.8 mM WW3* domain (13C, 15N-labeled) from human Nedd4-1 in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% (w/v) NaN3 and 1 mM DSS in a 93%/7% (v/v) H2O/D2O mixture. NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on NMR spectrometers equipped with cryogenically cooled z-gradient probes operating at 1H frequencies of 600 and 900 MHz. 1H, 15N and 13C chemical shift assignments of the WW3* domain were obtained using experiments in Table 1. An example of a backbone sequential walk using three-dimensional (3D) HNCA and CBCA(CO)NH spectra between residues F438 and H442 is presented in Fig. 4. Near complete backbone (193/200 or 96.5%) and side chain assignments (302/319 or 94.5%) were obtained. To derive NOE distance restraints for structure calculation, 15N-edited and 13C-edited NOESY spectra were recorded using mixing times between 150 and 180 ms. Backbone dihedral angles were obtained from TALOS+ [10] using a combination of backbone (1HN, 1Hα, 13Cα, 13C’ and 15N) and 13Cβ chemical shifts. Sidechain χ1 dihedral angles were obtained from a combination of 3Jαβ and 3JNβ couplings derived from 3D HNHB [11] and 3D HAHB(CACO)NH [12] experiments (Table 2).
Fig. 4

Strips from 3D HNCA (red) and 3D CBCA(CO)NH (green) spectra illustrating the backbone sequential walk from F438 to H442 of the WW3* domain. The 15N chemical shift is shown at the top of each strip.

MD simulations

MD simulations were performed using parameters described in [1].
Subject areaBiochemistry, structural biology
More specific subject areaNuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
Type of dataTables, figures
How data was acquiredHeteronuclear multidimensional solution-state NMR spectroscopy and MD simulations from experimental structure.
Data formatProcessed, analyzed
Experimental factorsThe NMR experiments were performed on samples containing 1.5–1.8 mM WW3* domain (13C, 15N-labeled) from human Nedd4-1 in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% (w/v) NaN3 and 1 mM DSS in a 93%/7% (v/v) H2O/D2O mixture.
Experimental featuresAll NMR spectra were acquired at 25 °C on Bruker BioSpin Avance III HD 600 and Varian INOVA 900 spectrometers and data were processed using NMRPipe.
Data source locationICS-6 (Strukturbiochemie), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
Data accessibilityData are within this article and have been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org) under the accession number PDB: 5AHT and in the BioMagResBank (accession code: 25349).
  11 in total

1.  A single WW domain is the predominant mediator of the interaction between the human ubiquitin-protein ligase Nedd4 and the human epithelial sodium channel.

Authors:  J Shaun Lott; Sarah J Coddington-Lawson; Paul H Teesdale-Spittle; Fiona J McDonald
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Measurement of (15)N- (1)H coupling constants in uniformly (15)N-labeled proteins: Application to the photoactive yellow protein.

Authors:  P Düx; B Whitehead; R Boelens; R Kaptein; G W Vuister
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  The Nedd4-1 WW Domain Recognizes the PY Motif Peptide through Coupled Folding and Binding Equilibria.

Authors:  Vineet Panwalkar; Philipp Neudecker; Michael Schmitz; Justin Lecher; Marianne Schulte; Karima Medini; Matthias Stoldt; Margaret A Brimble; Dieter Willbold; Andrew J Dingley
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system.

Authors:  Axel T Brunger
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Side-chain chi(1) conformations in urea-denatured ubiquitin and protein G from (3)J coupling constants and residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  Navratna Vajpai; Martin Gentner; Jie-Rong Huang; Martin Blackledge; Stephan Grzesiek
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Structure and dynamics of human Nedd4-1 WW3 in complex with the αENaC PY motif.

Authors:  Romel Bobby; Karima Medini; Philipp Neudecker; Tet Verne Lee; Margaret A Brimble; Fiona J McDonald; J Shaun Lott; Andrew J Dingley
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-05-08

8.  TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Frank Delaglio; Gabriel Cornilescu; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Structural and biochemical basis for ubiquitin ligase recruitment by arrestin-related domain-containing protein-3 (ARRDC3).

Authors:  Shiqian Qi; Morgan O'Hayre; J Silvio Gutkind; James H Hurley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline.

Authors:  Wim F Vranken; Wayne Boucher; Tim J Stevens; Rasmus H Fogh; Anne Pajon; Miguel Llinas; Eldon L Ulrich; John L Markley; John Ionides; Ernest D Laue
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.