| Literature DB >> 27419140 |
Diogo Fernandes Bellinato1, Priscila Fernandes Viana-Medeiros1, Simone Costa Araújo2, Ademir J Martins3, José Bento Pereira Lima4, Denise Valle5.
Abstract
Insecticides are still largely applied in public health to control disease vectors. In Brazil, organophosphates (OP) and pyrethroids (PY) are used against Aedes aegypti for years. Since 2009 Insect Growth Regulators (IGR) are also employed in the control of larvae. We quantified resistance to temephos (OP), deltamethrin (PY), and diflubenzuron (IGR) of A. aegypti samples from 12 municipalities distributed throughout the country, collected between 2010 and 2012. High levels of resistance to neurotoxic insecticides were detected in almost all populations: RR95 to temephos varied between 4.0 and 27.1; the lowest RR95 to deltamethrin was 13.1, and values higher than 70.0 were found. In contrast, all samples were susceptible to diflubenzuron (RR95 < 2.3). Biochemical tests performed with larvae and adults discarded the participation of acetylcholinesterase, the OP target, and confirmed involvement of the detoxifying enzymes esterases, mixed function oxidases, and glutathione-S-transferases. The results obtained were discussed taking into account the public chemical control component and the increase in the domestic use of insecticides during dengue epidemic seasons in the evaluated municipalities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27419140 PMCID: PMC4932163 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8603263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Brazilian map with the states used in the study in grey. RR: Roraima; PA: Pará; RN: Rio Grande do Norte; ES: Espírito Santo; and GO: Goiás. The continuous lines indicate the different regions of the country. N: north; NE: northeast; SE: southeast; S: south; and CW: central-west.
Figure 2Historic of insecticide distribution, between 2003 and 2012, by the Brazilian MoH to the States where mosquitoes samples were collected, in the indicated years. The municipalities evaluated are highlighted with red dots in the panels at right. During 2003–2008, two states, shown in lighter blue in the upper map at left, did not receive temephos continuously: at Roraima (RR) temephos supply started at 2005; at Rio Grande do Norte (RN) it ended at 2004. (∗) States that also received CSI (diflubenzuron or novaluron) during 2003–2008 (RN at 2004 and PA at 2008). Compounds against adults: all pyrethroids distributed by the MoH were considered, and not only deltamethrin (see text for details). Municipalities—APG: Aparecida de Goiânia; CAC: Caicó; CAS: Castanhal; CBL: Campos Belos; CIT: Cachoeiro de Itapemirim; GOI: Goiânia; MRB: Marabá; PCR: Pacaraima; RVD: Rio Verde; SMA: São Miguel do Araguaia; SSO: São Simão; and URU: Uruaçu.
Figure 3Incidence of reported dengue cases in the municipalities evaluated from 2008 to 2012 (values refer to the rate of notified cases per 100,000 inhabitants). In each panel, the thick red line refers to the dengue incidence in the corresponding State. The dashed line indicates the point above which dengue incidence is considered high. Note that in some panels it was necessary to change the y-scale in order to include all values.
Resistance status of several Brazilian municipalities to the larvicides temephos (OP) and diflubenzuron (CSI).
| Year | Region | State | Municipality/strain | Generation | Temephos | Generation | Diflubenzuron | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR50 | RR95 | Slope | RR50 | RR95 | Slope | ||||||
| 2010 | NE | RN | Rockefeller | 1.0 | 1.0 | 6.20 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.85 | ||
| Caicó | F2 | 8.4 |
| 5.07 | F2 | 2.2 |
| 6.56 | |||
|
| |||||||||||
| 2011 | N | RR | Rockefeller | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.03 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.16 | ||
| Pacaraima | F2 | 4.3 |
| 5.70 | F2 | 1.7 |
| 5.05 | |||
| PA | Castanhal | F2 | 8.2 |
| 3.53 | F2 | 1.4 |
| 4.75 | ||
| Marabá | F2 | 8.0 |
| 3.76 | F3 | 1.8 |
| 4.91 | |||
| SE | ES | Cachoeiro de Itapemirim | F1 | 18.4 |
| 5.57 | F2 | 1.9 |
| 5.03 | |
| CW | GO | Campos Belos | F2 | 9.1 |
| 3.68 | F2 | 1.7 |
| 4.38 | |
| Goiânia | F2 | 7.9 |
| 4.56 | F2 | 1.6 |
| 3.63 | |||
| Rio Verde | F2 | 11.5 |
| 3.77 | F2 | 2.0 |
| 5.32 | |||
| São Simão | F2 | 12.1 |
| 3.98 | F2 | 2.0 |
| 3.57 | |||
| Uruaçu | F2 | 10.5 |
| 4.08 | F2 | 1.9 |
| 5.78 | |||
|
| |||||||||||
| 2012 | CW | GO | Aparecida de Goiânia | F1 | 17.9 |
| 5.59 | F2 | 1.1 |
| 2.43 |
| São Miguel do Araguaia | F1 | 21.1 |
| 3.77 | F1 | 1.6 |
| 3.82 | |||
RR50 and RR95: resistance ratios; profiles corresponding to RR95 below or above 3.0 (italic font or bold font numbers) were classified as susceptible or resistant, respectively.
RR80 is informed. See Table S2 for additional details.
Resistance status of several Brazilian municipalities to the pyrethroid deltamethrin and allelic frequencies of the major kdr mutations found in the country.
| Year | Region | State | Municipality/strain | Generation | RR50 | RR95 | Slope | NaV allelic frequencies | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | R1 | R2 | ||||||||
| 2010 | NE | RN | Rockefeller | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.96 | ||||
| Caicó | F2 | 6.0 |
| 2.51 | 0.917 | 0.067 | 0.017 | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| 2011 | N | RR | Rockefeller | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.55 | ||||
| Pacaraima | F2 | 33.2 |
| 2.65 | 0.000 | 0.600 | 0.400 | |||
| PA | Castanhal | F2 | 9.9 |
| 3.05 | 0.667 | 0.300 | 0.033 | ||
| Marabá | F2 | 47.4 |
| 3.07 | 0.690 | 0.310 | 0.000 | |||
| SE | ES | Cachoeiro de Itapemirim | F1 | 49.0 | 78.6 | 2.16 | 0.103 | 0.224 | 0.672 | |
| CW | GO | Campos Belos | F2 | 25.3 |
| 2.43 | 0.310 | 0.086 | 0.603 | |
| Goiânia | F2 | 47.6 |
| 4.68 | ||||||
| Rio Verde | F2 | 32.5 |
| 2.74 | 0.241 | 0.207 | 0.552 | |||
| São Simão | F2 | 30.4 |
| 2.78 | 0.083 | 0.383 | 0.533 | |||
| Uruaçu | F2 | 38.6 |
| 3.37 | 0.450 | 0.117 | 0.433 | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| 2012 | CW | GO | Aparecida de Goiânia | F1 | 33.0 |
| 2.74 | 0.207 | 0.362 | 0.463 |
| São Miguel do Araguaia | F1 | 39.6 |
| 3.59 | 0.414 | 0.293 | 0.293 | |||
RR50 and RR95: resistance ratios; profiles corresponding to RR95 above 3.0 (bold font numbers) were classified as resistant.
RR80 is informed. See Table S3 for additional details.
Kdr allelic frequencies S, R1, and R2 refer to the positions 1016 and 1534 of the gene coding for the voltage gated sodium channel (NaV) as follows: S (susceptible) = 1016 Val+/1534 Phe+; R1 (single mutant) = 1016 Val+/1534 Cyskdr; and R2 (double mutant) = 1016 Ilekdr/1534 Cyskdr. Kdr data have been originally published by Linss et al. 2014 [20].
Quantification of the enzymatic activity of A. aegypti larvae from different Brazilian municipalities. Numbers refer to the rate of specimens with activity higher than the 99 percentile of Rockefeller (%>p99). Municipalities are arranged in descending order of temephos resistance (RR95 OP).
| Year | Region | State | Municipality/strain | RR95 OP | ACE | MFO | GST | A-EST | B-EST | PNPA-EST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | CO | GO | São Miguel do Araguaia |
| 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 2012 | CO | GO | Aparecida de Goiânia |
| 5 |
|
| 8 |
|
|
| 2011 | CO | GO | Rio Verde |
| 1 | 0 |
|
|
| 8 |
| 2011 | CO | GO | São Simão |
| 1 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 2011 | CO | GO | Campos Belos |
| 1 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| 2011 | N | PA | Castanhal |
| 0 |
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 2010 | NE | RN | Caicó |
| 0 | 4 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | CO | GO | Goiânia |
| 3 | 6 |
| 5 |
|
|
| 2011 | N | RR | Pacaraima |
| 6 | 1 |
| 0 | 14 | 3 |
Activities were classified as normal (regular font), altered (italic and underlined font) or highly altered (italic and bold) if these values ranged respectively below 15%, between 15 and 50% or above 50%.
Quantification of the enzymatic activity of A. aegypti adults from different Brazilian municipalities. Numbers refer to the rate of specimens with activity higher than the 99 percentile of Rockefeller (%>p99). Municipalities are arranged in descending order of deltamethrin resistance (RR95 PI).
| Year | Region | State | Municipality/strain | RR95 PI | ACE | MFO | GST | A-EST | B-EST | PNPA-EST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | SE | ES | Cachoeiro de Itapemirim | 78.6 | 0 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
| 2011 | N | RR | Pacaraima |
| 0 |
|
|
| 13 | 2 |
| 2012 | CO | GO | Aparecida de Goiânia |
| 1 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 2011 | CO | GO | Rio Verde |
| 13 |
| 4 |
| 8 | 13 |
| 2011 | CO | GO | Campos Belos |
| 0 | 8 |
| 14 | 1 | 6 |
| 2011 | CO | GO | São Simão |
|
| 9 |
|
| 14 | 15 |
| 2012 | CO | GO | São Miguel do Araguaia |
| 4 |
| 8 |
| 0 | 8 |
| 2011 | CO | GO | Goiânia |
| 0 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
| 2010 | NE | RN | Caicó |
| 3 | 0 | 11 |
|
| 6 |
Activities were classified as normal (regular font), altered (italic and underlined font) or highly altered (italic and bold) if these values ranged respectively below 15%, between 15 and 50% or above 50%. RR80 is informed.