| Literature DB >> 27418965 |
Maryam Paknahad1, S M J Mortazavi2, Shoaleh Shahidi3, Ghazal Mortazavi4, Masoud Haghani4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dental amalgam is composed of approximately 50% elemental mercury. Despite concerns over the toxicity of mercury, amalgam is still the most widely used restorative material. Wi-Fi is a rapidly using local area wireless computer networking technology. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates the effect of exposure to Wi-Fi signals on mercury release from amalgam restorations.Entities:
Keywords: Amalgam; Mercury release, Radiofrequency, Electromagnetic fields; Wi-Fi
Year: 2016 PMID: 27418965 PMCID: PMC4944481 DOI: 10.1186/s40201-016-0253-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Fig. 1The geometry used for exposure of the teeth samples
The mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum of the mercury release in the two groups
| Mercury release (mg/L) | Group | ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Wi-Fi | ||
| Mean ± SD | 0.026 ± .008 | 0.056 ± .025 | 0.009 |
Comparison of the findings of current study with other studies performed either on mercury release or amalgam microleakage after exposure to electromagnetic fields
| Radiation source | Endpoint | Methods | Basic finding | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Phone | Release of Mercury | Urine samples were collected from 14 female students | A statistically significant ( | Mortazavi et al. [ |
| MRI (0.23 T) | Release of Mercury | Stimulated saliva collected in 30 persons | Elevated urinary mercury concentration in the exposed group | Mortazavi et al. [ |
| MRI (1.5 T) | Release of Mercury | Urinary concentrations of mercury in the MRI exposed and control subjects | The urinary mercury in the exposed group, 72 h after MRI (96 h after restoration),was significantly higher ( | Mortazavi et al. [ |
| X-ray | Release of Mercury | Teeth samples were exposed to X-rays in a soft tissue-equivalent material | A significant increase in mercury was observed in the X-ray-exposed group ( | Kursun et al. [ |
| MRI | Release of Mercury | Teeth samples were exposed to MRI in a soft tissue-equivalent material | No significant difference was found in the MRI-exposed group. | Kursun et al. [ |
| MRI (3 T) | Microleakage of amalgam | 60 extracted teeth divided into experimental and control groups exposed/shamexposed to a magnetic field of 3 T for 20 min | significant differences in microleakage between the groups exposed to MRI and controls, whereas differences in microleakage between amalgam types were insignificant. | Yilmaz and Misirlioglu [ |
| MRI (1.5 T) | Microleakage of amalgam | 63 human freshly extracted premolars were divided into 3 groups (3 different amalgams). In each group, 50% of the samples were exposed to MRI. | Differences in microleakage within each group following MRI were significant in the GS-80 and Vivacap groups but not in the Cinalux group. | Shahidi et al. [ |
| MRI (1.5 T) | Microleakage of amalgam | 40 teeth were randomly divided into four groups.. The first and third groups were exposed to MRI. | No significant differences of occlusal and gingival surface microleakage after MRI exposure were observed. | Akgun et al. 2014 [ |
| Wi-Fi | Mercury release | 20 extracted teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups of Wi-Fi exposure and control. | A significant increase in mercury release was observed in Wi-Fi exposed group. | Current study |