| Literature DB >> 27416910 |
J Versluis1, F E M In 't Hout2,3, R Devillier1, W L J van Putten4, M G Manz5, M-C Vekemans6, M-C Legdeur7, J R Passweg8, J Maertens9, J Kuball10, B J Biemond11, P J M Valk1, B A van der Reijden3, G Meloni12, H C Schouten13, E Vellenga14, T Pabst15, R Willemze16, B Löwenberg1, G Ossenkoppele17, F Baron18, G Huls2, J J Cornelissen1.
Abstract
Post-remission treatment (PRT) in patients with cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) is debated. We studied 521 patients with CN-AML in CR1, for whom mutational status of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD was available, including the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio. PRT consisted of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) (n=68), myeloablative conditioning (MAC) alloHSCT (n=137), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) (n=168) or chemotherapy (n=148). Favorable overall survival (OS) was found for patients with mutated NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (71±4%). Outcome in patients with a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio appeared to be very poor with OS and relapse-free survival (RFS) of 23±8% and 12±6%, respectively. Patients with wild-type NPM1 without FLT3-ITD or with a low allelic burden of FLT3-ITD were considered as intermediate-risk group because of similar OS and RFS at 5 years, in which PRT by RIC alloHSCT resulted in better OS and RFS as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, P=0.022 and HR 0.50, P=0.004, respectively) or autoHSCT (HR 0.60, P=0.046 and HR 0.60, P=0.043, respectively). The lowest cumulative incidence of relapse (23±4%) was observed following MAC alloHSCT. These results suggest that alloHSCT may be preferred in patients with molecularly intermediate-risk CN-AML, while the choice of conditioning type may be personalized according to risk for non-relapse mortality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27416910 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528