Literature DB >> 23321257

Prospective evaluation of gene mutations and minimal residual disease in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Eric Jourdan1, Nicolas Boissel, Sylvie Chevret, Eric Delabesse, Aline Renneville, Pascale Cornillet, Odile Blanchet, Jean-Michel Cayuela, Christian Recher, Emmanuel Raffoux, Jacques Delaunay, Arnaud Pigneux, Claude-Eric Bulabois, Céline Berthon, Cécile Pautas, Norbert Vey, Bruno Lioure, Xavier Thomas, Isabelle Luquet, Christine Terré, Philippe Guardiola, Marie C Béné, Claude Preudhomme, Norbert Ifrah, Hervé Dombret.   

Abstract

Not all patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) display a good outcome. Modern risk factors include KIT and/or FLT3 gene mutations and minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, but their respective values have never been prospectively assessed. A total of 198 CBF-AML patients were randomized between a reinforced and a standard induction course, followed by 3 high-dose cytarabine consolidation courses. MRD levels were monitored prospectively. Gene mutations were screened at diagnosis. Despite a more rapid MRD decrease after reinforced induction, induction arm did not influence relapse-free survival (RFS) (64% in both arms; P = .91). Higher WBC, KIT, and/or FLT3-ITD/TKD gene mutations, and a less than 3-log MRD reduction after first consolidation, were associated with a higher specific hazard of relapse, but MRD remained the sole prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. At 36 months, cumulative incidence of relapse and RFS were 22% vs 54% (P < .001) and 73% vs 44% (P < .001) in patients who achieved 3-log MRD reduction vs the others. These results suggest that MRD, rather than gene mutations, should be used for future treatment stratifications in CBF-AML patients. This trial was registered at EudraCT as #2006-005163-26 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT 00428558.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23321257     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-462879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  113 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for relapse after allogeneic transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Gert J Ossenkoppele; Jeroen J W M Janssen; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Comparison of spatial chromosomal organization between bone marrow and peripheral blood in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Xueli Tian; Yanfang Wang; Yu Liu; Jun Yin; Dieyan Chen; Xiaoyan Ke; Wanyun Ma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Vijaya Raj Bhatt
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults.

Authors:  Gevorg Tamamyan; Tapan Kadia; Farhad Ravandi; Gautam Borthakur; Jorge Cortes; Elias Jabbour; Naval Daver; Maro Ohanian; Hagop Kantarjian; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  DNMT3A mutant transcript levels persist in remission and do not predict outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  V I Gaidzik; D Weber; P Paschka; A Kaumanns; S Krieger; A Corbacioglu; J Krönke; S Kapp-Schwoerer; D Krämer; H-A Horst; I Schmidt-Wolf; G Held; A Kündgen; M Ringhoffer; K Götze; T Kindler; W Fiedler; M Wattad; R F Schlenk; L Bullinger; V Teleanu; B Schlegelberger; F Thol; M Heuser; A Ganser; H Döhner; K Döhner
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  FLT3 ligand plasma levels in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Pierre Peterlin; Joelle Gaschet; Thierry Guillaume; Alice Garnier; Marion Eveillard; Amandine Le Bourgeois; Michel Cherel; Camille Debord; Yannick Le Bris; Olivier Theisen; Béatrice Mahé; Viviane Dubruille; Catherine Godon; Nelly Robillard; Soraya Wuilleme; Cyrille Touzeau; Thomas Gastinne; Nicolas Blin; Anne Lok; Antoine Bonnet; Steven Le Gouill; Philippe Moreau; Marie-C Béné; Patrice Chevallier
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  Management of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the era of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Christine M McMahon; Alexander E Perl
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-09-20

8.  Interferon-α Is Effective for Treatment of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with t(8;21) Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Prospective Registry Study.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Mo; Yu Wang; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Lan-Ping Xu; Chen-Hua Yan; Huan Chen; Yu-Hong Chen; Ya-Zhen Qin; Kai-Yan Liu; Xiao-Jun Huang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 9.  Back to the future! The evolving role of maintenance therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher S Hourigan; Philip McCarthy; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Gemtuzumab ozogamicin with fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (FLAG-GO) as front-line regimen in patients with core binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Gautam Borthakur; Jorge E Cortes; Elihu E Estey; Elias Jabbour; Stefan Faderl; Susan O'Brien; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Tapan Mahendra Kadia; Xuemei Wang; Keyur Patel; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Charles Koller; Mark Brandt; Farhad Ravandi; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 10.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.