Giandomenico Roviello1,2, Laura Zanotti2, Sergio Venturini3, Alberto Bottini2, Daniele Generali2,4. 1. a Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Section of Pharmacology and University Center DIFF-Drug Innovation Forward Future , University of Brescia , Brescia , Italy. 2. b Unit of Molecular Therapy and Pharmacogenomic , AO Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona , Cremona , Italy. 3. c Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CeRGAS) , Bocconi University , Milan , Italy. 4. d Department of Medical , Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste , Trieste , Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several randomized phase III trials in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) showed the clinical role of new targeted agents and their impact on tumor response and outcome of whose patients affected by advanced NET. In this study, we summarize the available clinical data related to clinical efficacy of targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced NETs. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized studies in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed after searching the databases of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the ASCO University Meeting for relevant publications. RESULTS: One thousand 9 hundred and 8 cases were included in the meta-analysis; among these, 1012 were in the experimental arm and 896 were in the control arm. The pooled analysis of the use of target agents in NETs revealed significantly increased of progression free survival compared to control group (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI:0.42-0.84; P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis of patients according to tumor site showed a difference in favor of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Moreover, targeted therapies improved the overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98; P = 0.03), and response rate (hazard ratio = 3.33, 95% CI 2.02-5.49; P < 0.00001) in all types of NETs. CONCLUSION: Our analysis supports the routine use of targeted agents for treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with particular regards to the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
BACKGROUND: Several randomized phase III trials in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) showed the clinical role of new targeted agents and their impact on tumor response and outcome of whose patients affected by advanced NET. In this study, we summarize the available clinical data related to clinical efficacy of targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced NETs. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized studies in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed after searching the databases of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the ASCO University Meeting for relevant publications. RESULTS: One thousand 9 hundred and 8 cases were included in the meta-analysis; among these, 1012 were in the experimental arm and 896 were in the control arm. The pooled analysis of the use of target agents in NETs revealed significantly increased of progression free survival compared to control group (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI:0.42-0.84; P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis of patients according to tumor site showed a difference in favor of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Moreover, targeted therapies improved the overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98; P = 0.03), and response rate (hazard ratio = 3.33, 95% CI 2.02-5.49; P < 0.00001) in all types of NETs. CONCLUSION: Our analysis supports the routine use of targeted agents for treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with particular regards to the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Authors: Jun Yao; Jian-yao Wang; Yi Liu; Bin Wang; Ying-xue Li; Ru Zhang; Li-sheng Wang; Lei Liu Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Lillian L Siu; Joel E Tepper; George Fisher; Deborah Jaffe; Daniel G Haller; Lee M Ellis; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Emily K Bergsland; Timothy J Hobday; Eric Van Cutsem; James Pingpank; Kjell Oberg; Steven J Cohen; Mitchell C Posner; James C Yao Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pamela L Kunz; Diane Reidy-Lagunes; Lowell B Anthony; Erin M Bertino; Kari Brendtro; Jennifer A Chan; Herbert Chen; Robert T Jensen; Michelle Kang Kim; David S Klimstra; Matthew H Kulke; Eric H Liu; David C Metz; Alexandria T Phan; Rebecca S Sippel; Jonathan R Strosberg; James C Yao Journal: Pancreas Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Anja Rinke; Hans-Helge Müller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Klaus-Jochen Klose; Peter Barth; Matthias Wied; Christina Mayer; Behnaz Aminossadati; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Michael Bläker; Jan Harder; Christian Arnold; Thomas Gress; Rudolf Arnold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jun Zhang; Zhiliang Jia; Qiang Li; Liwei Wang; Asif Rashid; Zhenggang Zhu; Douglas B Evans; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Keping Xie; James C Yao Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Johanna Bendell; Larry Kvols; Joel Picus; Rodney Pommier; James Yao Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 17.388