Benedikt Hofauer1, Kingman Strohl2, Andreas Knopf3, Murat Bas3, Markus Wirth3, Konrad Stock4, Clemens Heiser3. 1. Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. b.hofauer@tum.de. 2. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. 4. Nephrology/II. Medical Department, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate the feasibility of sonographic evaluation of functional tongue motion as a tool to evaluate postoperative outcomes in human subjects using breathing-synchronized stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve-a novel therapy option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with OSA (n = 16, age 60.4 ± 10.2, BMI 28.7 ± 2.4, AHI 35.0 ± 11.8) underwent sonographic evaluation of tongue motion after initiation of therapy with the Inspire II Upper Airway Stimulation system. Sonographic examination was performed in four different planes (A = floor of the mouth frontal, B = base of the tongue horizontal, C = floor of the mouth parallel to mandible, and D = floor of the mouth median sagittal) in an attempt to visualize tongue surface, tongue and hyoid motion, and the distance of protrusion. RESULTS: Identification of the tongue surface was achieved in all cases in planes B, C, and D and 81 % of patients in plane A. Tongue motion was evident on the right (implant) side in 63 % in plane A and 75 % in plane B. Distance of protrusion was measured in plane B at 1.04 cm (±0.51), in plane C at 1.08 cm (±0.47), and in plane D at 0.96 cm (±0.45). Hyoid protrusion was measured in plane C or D and was 0.57 cm (±0.39). Significant correlations among the three planes were observed, but there was no correlation to the reduction of apnea-hypopnea index. CONCLUSION: The results indicate feasibility of sonography to identify tongue and hyoid motions during upper airway stimulation. Useful sonographic planes and landmarks, which allow visualization of dynamic effects of upper airway stimulation, could be established. The evaluation of the tongue in a horizontal (B) and in a sagittal plane (D) appears to be superior to the other investigated planes. The approximate tongue protrusion needed to generate a significant reduction of AHI and ODI was 1 cm.
INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate the feasibility of sonographic evaluation of functional tongue motion as a tool to evaluate postoperative outcomes in human subjects using breathing-synchronized stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve-a novel therapy option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with OSA (n = 16, age 60.4 ± 10.2, BMI 28.7 ± 2.4, AHI 35.0 ± 11.8) underwent sonographic evaluation of tongue motion after initiation of therapy with the Inspire II Upper Airway Stimulation system. Sonographic examination was performed in four different planes (A = floor of the mouth frontal, B = base of the tongue horizontal, C = floor of the mouth parallel to mandible, and D = floor of the mouth median sagittal) in an attempt to visualize tongue surface, tongue and hyoid motion, and the distance of protrusion. RESULTS: Identification of the tongue surface was achieved in all cases in planes B, C, and D and 81 % of patients in plane A. Tongue motion was evident on the right (implant) side in 63 % in plane A and 75 % in plane B. Distance of protrusion was measured in plane B at 1.04 cm (±0.51), in plane C at 1.08 cm (±0.47), and in plane D at 0.96 cm (±0.45). Hyoid protrusion was measured in plane C or D and was 0.57 cm (±0.39). Significant correlations among the three planes were observed, but there was no correlation to the reduction of apnea-hypopnea index. CONCLUSION: The results indicate feasibility of sonography to identify tongue and hyoid motions during upper airway stimulation. Useful sonographic planes and landmarks, which allow visualization of dynamic effects of upper airway stimulation, could be established. The evaluation of the tongue in a horizontal (B) and in a sagittal plane (D) appears to be superior to the other investigated planes. The approximate tongue protrusion needed to generate a significant reduction of AHI and ODI was 1 cm.
Authors: Amy M Sawyer; Nalaka S Gooneratne; Carole L Marcus; Dafna Ofer; Kathy C Richards; Terri E Weaver Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Peter R Eastwood; Maree Barnes; Stuart G MacKay; John R Wheatley; David R Hillman; Xuân-Lan Nguyên; Richard Lewis; Matthew C Campbell; Boris Pételle; Jennifer H Walsh; Andrew C Jones; Carsten E Palme; Alain Bizon; Nicole Meslier; Chloé Bertolus; Kathleen J Maddison; Laurent Laccourreye; Guillaume Raux; Katleen Denoncin; Valérie Attali; Frédéric Gagnadoux; Sandrine H Launois Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Saif Mashaqi; Salma Imran Patel; Daniel Combs; Lauren Estep; Sonia Helmick; Joan Machamer; Sairam Parthasarathy Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 3.390