Armin Steffen1,2, Henning Frenzel3, Barbara Wollenberg3, Inke R König4. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. armin.steffen@uksh.de. 2. Klinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. armin.steffen@uksh.de. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. 4. Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Upper airway stimulation is an effective treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea after failure of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. To ensure a therapeutic effect, closed-loop hypoglossal nerve implants require the absence of palatal complete concentric collapse during sleep endoscopy. The frequency and potential predictors of this exclusion criterion are unknown. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 74 consecutive patients with sleep apnea who sought PAP alternatives were evaluated with sleep endoscopy using propofol. The influence of sleep apnea severity and anthropometric characteristics as predictors of sleep endoscopy results was investigated. RESULTS: One-fifth of all patients showed a concentric collapse. Gender and age did not predict the presence of concentric collapse, but higher body mass and apnea hypopnea index values were predictive (p = 0.011; e.g., 0.026). The most commonly used body mass index values for upper airway stimulation indications demonstrated acceptable specificity (BMI 32 kg/m(2) 0.71, 95 % confidence interval = 0.57, 0.82; e.g., 35 kg/m(2) 0.81, 95 % confidence interval = 0.69, 0.90). Despite the association with overweight, a significant number of severely overweight patients had no concentric palatal collapse. CONCLUSIONS: Concentric collapse is a somewhat common condition encountered in sleep endoscopy evaluations of PAP alternatives, and cannot be sustainably predicted with anthropometric or sleep assessments. Sleep surgeons should be aware of the possibility of concentric collapse, especially in candidates who are more overweight and have severe sleep apnea. Sleep endoscopy can be useful for providing information about continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) alternatives or to motivate patient adherence to treatment.
PURPOSE: Upper airway stimulation is an effective treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea after failure of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. To ensure a therapeutic effect, closed-loop hypoglossal nerve implants require the absence of palatal complete concentric collapse during sleep endoscopy. The frequency and potential predictors of this exclusion criterion are unknown. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 74 consecutive patients with sleep apnea who sought PAP alternatives were evaluated with sleep endoscopy using propofol. The influence of sleep apnea severity and anthropometric characteristics as predictors of sleep endoscopy results was investigated. RESULTS: One-fifth of all patients showed a concentric collapse. Gender and age did not predict the presence of concentric collapse, but higher body mass and apnea hypopnea index values were predictive (p = 0.011; e.g., 0.026). The most commonly used body mass index values for upper airway stimulation indications demonstrated acceptable specificity (BMI 32 kg/m(2) 0.71, 95 % confidence interval = 0.57, 0.82; e.g., 35 kg/m(2) 0.81, 95 % confidence interval = 0.69, 0.90). Despite the association with overweight, a significant number of severely overweight patients had no concentric palatal collapse. CONCLUSIONS: Concentric collapse is a somewhat common condition encountered in sleep endoscopy evaluations of PAP alternatives, and cannot be sustainably predicted with anthropometric or sleep assessments. Sleep surgeons should be aware of the possibility of concentric collapse, especially in candidates who are more overweight and have severe sleep apnea. Sleep endoscopy can be useful for providing information about continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) alternatives or to motivate patient adherence to treatment.
Authors: T Verse; R Bodlaj; R de la Chaux; A Dreher; C Heiser; M Herzog; W Hohenhorst; K Hörmann; O Kaschke; T Kühnel; N Mahl; J T Maurer; W Pirsig; K Rohde; A Sauter; M Schedler; R Siegert; A Steffen; B A Stuck Journal: HNO Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: Patrick J Strollo; Ryan J Soose; Joachim T Maurer; Nico de Vries; Jason Cornelius; Oleg Froymovich; Ronald D Hanson; Tapan A Padhya; David L Steward; M Boyd Gillespie; B Tucker Woodson; Paul H Van de Heyning; Mark G Goetting; Oliver M Vanderveken; Neil Feldman; Lennart Knaack; Kingman P Strohl Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eric J Kezirian; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Wendy Ma; Charles E McCulloch; Andrew N Goldberg Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-04
Authors: Olivier M Vanderveken; Joachim T Maurer; Winfried Hohenhorst; Evert Hamans; Ho-Sheng Lin; Anneclaire V Vroegop; Clemens Anders; Nico de Vries; Paul H Van de Heyning Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Krista Rodriguez-Bruno; Andrew N Goldberg; Charles E McCulloch; Eric J Kezirian Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Benedikt Hofauer; Kingman Strohl; Andreas Knopf; Murat Bas; Markus Wirth; Konrad Stock; Clemens Heiser Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Sara Op de Beeck; Marijke Dieltjens; Annelies E Verbruggen; Anneclaire V Vroegop; Kristien Wouters; Evert Hamans; Marc Willemen; Johan Verbraecken; Wilfried A De Backer; Paul H Van de Heyning; Marc J Braem; Olivier M Vanderveken Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Maria V Suurna; Ofer Jacobowitz; Jolie Chang; Ioannis Koutsourelakis; David Smith; Uri Alkan; Mark D'Agostino; Maurits Boon; Clemens Heiser; Paul Hoff; Colin Huntley; David Kent; Alan Kominsky; Richard Lewis; Joachim T Maurer; Madeline J Ravesloot; Ryan Soose; Armin Steffen; Edward M Weaver; Amy M Williams; Tucker Woodson; Kathleen Yaremchuk; Stacey L Ishman Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.062