Rudolph M Navari1, Rui Qin1, Kathryn J Ruddy1, Heshan Liu1, Steven F Powell1, Madhuri Bajaj1, Leah Dietrich1, David Biggs1, Jacqueline M Lafky1, Charles L Loprinzi1. 1. From Indiana University School of Medicine-South Bend, South Bend (R.M.N.); Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic (R.Q., H.L.), and Mayo Clinic (K.J.R., J.M.L., C.L.L.), Rochester, MN; Sanford NCORP (National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program) of the North Central Plains, Sioux Falls, SD (S.F.P.); Illinois Cancer Care-Peoria, Peoria (M.B.); Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, WI (L.D.); and Delaware-Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, DE (D.B.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the efficacy of olanzapine for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we compared olanzapine with placebo, in combination with dexamethasone, aprepitant or fosaprepitant, and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3-receptor antagonist, in patients with no previous chemotherapy who were receivingcisplatin (≥70 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin. The doses of the three concomitant drugs administered before and after chemotherapy were similar in the two groups. The two groups received either 10 mg of olanzapine orally or matching placebo daily on days 1 through 4. Nausea prevention was the primary end point; a complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medication) was a secondary end point. RESULTS: In the analysis, we included 380 patients who could be evaluated (192 assigned toolanzapine, and 188 to placebo). The proportion of patients with no chemotherapy-induced nausea was significantly greater with olanzapine than with placebo in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy (74% vs. 45%, P=0.002), the period from 25 to 120 hours after chemotherapy (42% vs. 25%, P=0.002), and the overall 120-hour period (37% vs. 22%, P=0.002). The complete-response rate was also significantly increased with olanzapine during the three periods: 86% versus 65% (P<0.001), 67% versus 52% (P=0.007), and 64% versus 41% (P<0.001), respectively. Although there were no grade 5 toxic effects, some patients receiving olanzapine had increased sedation (severe in 5%) on day 2. CONCLUSIONS:Olanzapine, as compared with placebo, significantly improved nausea prevention, as well as the complete-response rate, among previously untreated patients who were receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02116530.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We examined the efficacy of olanzapine for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we compared olanzapine with placebo, in combination with dexamethasone, aprepitant or fosaprepitant, and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3-receptor antagonist, in patients with no previous chemotherapy who were receiving cisplatin (≥70 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin. The doses of the three concomitant drugs administered before and after chemotherapy were similar in the two groups. The two groups received either 10 mg of olanzapine orally or matching placebo daily on days 1 through 4. Nausea prevention was the primary end point; a complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medication) was a secondary end point. RESULTS: In the analysis, we included 380 patients who could be evaluated (192 assigned to olanzapine, and 188 to placebo). The proportion of patients with no chemotherapy-induced nausea was significantly greater with olanzapine than with placebo in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy (74% vs. 45%, P=0.002), the period from 25 to 120 hours after chemotherapy (42% vs. 25%, P=0.002), and the overall 120-hour period (37% vs. 22%, P=0.002). The complete-response rate was also significantly increased with olanzapine during the three periods: 86% versus 65% (P<0.001), 67% versus 52% (P=0.007), and 64% versus 41% (P<0.001), respectively. Although there were no grade 5 toxic effects, some patients receiving olanzapine had increased sedation (severe in 5%) on day 2. CONCLUSIONS:Olanzapine, as compared with placebo, significantly improved nausea prevention, as well as the complete-response rate, among previously untreated patients who were receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02116530.).
Authors: L E Goldstein; J Sporn; S Brown; H Kim; J Finkelstein; G K Gaffey; G Sachs; T A Stern Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 1999 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Ethan Basch; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Paul J Hesketh; Mark G Kris; Petra C Feyer; Mark R Somerfield; Maurice Chesney; Rebecca Anne Clark-Snow; Anne Marie Flaherty; Barbara Freundlich; Gary Morrow; Kamakshi V Rao; Rowena N Schwartz; Gary H Lyman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F P Bymaster; J F Falcone; D Bauzon; J S Kennedy; K Schenck; N W DeLapp; M L Cohen Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2001-11-02 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Steven D Passik; Rudolph M Navari; Sin-Ho Jung; Cindy Nagy; Jake Vinson; Kenneth L Kirsh; Patrick Loehrer Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Rudolph M Navari; Lawrence H Einhorn; Steven D Passik; Patrick J Loehrer; Cynthia Johnson; M L Mayer; J McClean; Jake Vinson; W Pletcher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer Y Sheng; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Neha Mangini; Haval Norman; Rima Couzi; Raquel Nunes; Mary Wilkinson; Kala Visvanathan; Roisin M Connolly; Evanthia T Roussos Torres; John H Fetting; Deborah K Armstrong; Jessica J Tao; Lisa Jacobs; Jean L Wright; Elissa D Thorner; Christine Hodgdon; Samantha Horn; Antonio C Wolff; Vered Stearns; Karen L Smith Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-06-30
Authors: Yasmeen Razvi; Stephanie Chan; Thomas McFarlane; Erin McKenzie; Pearl Zaki; Carlo DeAngelis; William Pidduck; Ahmad Bushehri; Edward Chow; Katarzyna Joanna Jerzak Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Midori Nakagaki; Michael Barras; Cameron Curley; Jason P Butler; Glen A Kennedy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jørn Herrstedt; Yvonne Summers; Gedske Daugaard; Thomas B Christensen; Karin Holmskov; Paul D Taylor; Gabriel M Fox; Alexander Molassiotis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Zev M Nakamura; Rebekah P Nash; Laura J Quillen; Daniel R Richardson; Rebecca C McCall; Eliza M Park Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2019-01-19 Impact factor: 2.386