Literature DB >> 27410398

Fifteen years of Belgian experience with external quality assessment of semen analysis.

U Punjabi1, C Wyns2, A Mahmoud3, K Vernelen4, B China4, G Verheyen5.   

Abstract

Semen analysis is difficult to standardize, quality control and quality assurance are necessary to ensure that results are accurate and precise. This Belgian EQA survey over a 15-year period, involving 121 laboratories, attempted to reduce interlaboratory variability and at the same time, encouraged participating laboratories to implement correct techniques as advised by the WHO. Over the total period, the median coefficient of variation (CV) for sperm count, irrespective of the method used was 19.2%, while using improved Neubauer chamber resulted in a significantly (p < 0.001) lower median CV (14.4%). The overall median CV for rapid progressive motility was high (37.1%), but progressive motility (15.1%) and total motility (13.8%) were acceptable. Sperm morphology revealed a large variability in 79.4% irrespective of the staining procedures or evaluation criteria used. Participation in the Belgian EQA is on voluntary basis. Both, participation and implementation of the correct techniques should be made mandatory for accreditation and benefit of patient treatment. The existing Belgian EQA program should now be harmonized with other existing EQA schemes in Europe.
© 2016 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  quality control; sperm concentration; sperm morphology; sperm motility; sperm quality parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27410398     DOI: 10.1111/andr.12230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  15 in total

1.  DNA fragmentation in concert with the simultaneous assessment of cell viability in a subfertile population: establishing thresholds of normality both before and after density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  U Punjabi; H Van Mulders; I Goovaerts; K Peeters; E Roelant; D De Neubourg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  An automated smartphone-based diagnostic assay for point-of-care semen analysis.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy; Magesh Sadasivam; Anupriya Singh; Collin Preston; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Maanasa Venkataraman; Charles L Bormann; Mohamed Shehata Draz; John C Petrozza; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Poor reproducibility of percentage of normally shaped sperm using the World Health Organization Fifth Edition strict grading criteria.

Authors:  Karen C Baker; Anne Z Steiner; Karl R Hansen; Kurt T Barnhart; Marcelle I Cedars; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Stephen A Krawetz; Rebecca Usadi; Valerie L Baker; R Matthew Coward; Fangbai Sun; Robert Wild; Puneet Masson; James F Smith; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  Time intervals between semen production, initiation of analysis, and IUI significantly influence clinical pregnancies and live births.

Authors:  U Punjabi; H Van Mulders; L Van de Velde; I Goovaerts; K Peeters; W Cassauwers; T Lyubetska; K Clasen; P Janssens; O Zemtsova; E Roelant; D De Neubourg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Immunological Tolerance, Pregnancy, and Preeclampsia: The Roles of Semen Microbes and the Father.

Authors:  Louise C Kenny; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-01-04

6.  Simplified sperm testing devices: a possible tool to overcome lack of accessibility and inconsistency in male factor infertility diagnosis. An opportunity for low- and middle- income countries.

Authors:  J Onofre; L Geenen; A Cox; I Van Der Auwera; F Willendrup; E Andersen; R Campo; N Dhont; W Ombelet
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 7.  A Novel Approach to Improving the Reliability of Manual Semen Analysis: A Paradigm Shift in the Workup of Infertile Men.

Authors:  Christopher Douglas; Neel Parekh; Linda G Kahn; Ralf Henkel; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 8.  The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities.

Authors:  Christopher L R Barratt; Lars Björndahl; Christopher J De Jonge; Dolores J Lamb; Francisco Osorio Martini; Robert McLachlan; Robert D Oates; Sheryl van der Poel; Bianca St John; Mark Sigman; Rebecca Sokol; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Evaluation of the Standardization in Semen Analysis Performance According to the WHO Protocols Among Laboratories in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Masha Ahadi; Fereshte Aliakbari; Saeedeh Latifi; Seyed Jalil Hosseini; Atossa Gharib; Abolfazl Movafagh; Zahra Abdolalian; Arash Dehghan; Arsham Moradi; Behrang Kazeminejad; Azadeh Rakhshan; Elena Jamali; Farzad Allameh; Afshin Moradi
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2019-06-10

10.  Sperm morphology from the actual inseminated sample does not predict clinical pregnancy following intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Jamie Stanhiser; Jennifer E Mersereau; Daquan Dock; Caitlin Boylan; Hunter Caprell; R Matthew Coward; Dara S Berger; Marc Fritz
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.