Literature DB >> 27410191

Parameters influencing glenoid loosening.

Anne Karelse1, Alexander Van Tongel1, Tom Van Isacker2, Bart Berghs2, L De Wilde1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of organization in existing studies on the outcome and complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. As a result, it is difficult to gain substantial evidence regarding the rate and risk factors for the occurrence of glenoid loosening which remains the most common cause of prosthetic failure. To improve the quality of future studies, an agreement should exist on definitions of glenoid loosening and on the potential risk factors. AREAS COVERED: Reviewing the literature, loosening can be defined as the appearance of radiolucent lines, radiological loosening, clinical loosening and revision as the end stage. Three different categories of influencing parameters can be distinguished: implant related, patient related and surgeon related. Expert commentary: The aim of this review is to organize the available knowledge on glenoid failure, as well as to describe the gaps so that it will constructively contribute to the debate on how to prevent glenoid failure in the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenoid component; glenoid component failure; glenoid erosion; glenoid loosening; glenoid plane; inclination; radiolucent lines glenoid; retroversion; surgical experience; total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27410191     DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1205483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  3 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of glenoid deformity in glenohumeral arthritis using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence.

Authors:  Yoav Rosenthal; Mohammad Samim; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Oluwadamilola O Kolade; Young W Kwon; Joseph D Zuckerman; Mandeep S Virk
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  Improving the surface properties of an UHMWPE shoulder implant with an atmospheric pressure plasma jet.

Authors:  S Van Vrekhem; K Vloebergh; M Asadian; C Vercruysse; H Declercq; A Van Tongel; L De Wilde; N De Geyter; R Morent
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.