| Literature DB >> 27410033 |
Yuejun Tian1, Zhiming Ma1, Zhaohui Chen1, Mingguo Li1, Zhiping Wu2, Mei Hong1, Hanzhang Wang3, Robert Svatek3, Ronald Rodriguez3, Zhiping Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ki-67 is an established marker of cell proliferation, and the Ki-67 index correlates with the clinical course of several cancer types, including bladder cancer (BC). However, the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of Ki-67 in bladder cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify this relationship.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27410033 PMCID: PMC4943634 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow chart shows study selection procedure.
Fig 2The hazard ratio (HR) of Ki-67 expression associated with RFS in all bladder cancer patients.
Results of subgroup analysis of the association between Ki-67 expression and RFS/PFS/OS/CSS of bladder cancer.
| Outcome | Studies (n) | Patients | HR | 95%CI | P value | Model | Heterogeneity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chi2, I2, P value | ||||||||
| 16 | 2773 | 1.69 | 1.33–2.14 | 0.000 | Random | 33.49, 55%, 0.004 | ||
| 7 | 2163 | 1.36 | 0.97–1.90 | 0.07 | Random | 13.37, 55%, 0.04 | ||
| 9 | 610 | 2.23 | 1.82–2.73 | 0.000 | Fixed | 11.85, 33%, 0.16 | ||
| 6 | 927 | 1.45 | 1.09–1.93 | 0.01 | Fixed | 8.58, 42%, 0.13 | ||
| 6 | 774 | 1.99 | 1.54–2.57 | 0.000 | Fixed | 9.26, 46%, 0.10 | ||
| 4 | 1072 | 1.56 | 0.91–2.66 | 0.11 | Random | 12.52, 76%, 0.006 | ||
| 14 | 2560 | 1.79 | 1.40–2.28 | 0.000 | Random | 28.88, 55%, 0.007 | ||
| 1 | 152 | 1.09 | 0.39–3.08 | 0.87 | Fixed | - | ||
| 5 | 522 | 1.63 | 1.20–2.23 | 0.002 | Fixed | 4.42, 10%, 0.35 | ||
| 10 | 1694 | 1.89 | 1.43–2.51 | 0.000 | Fixed | 16.34, 45%, 0.06 | ||
| 4 | 618 | 1.35 | 0.48–3.82 | 0.57 | Random | 11.41, 74%, 0.01 | ||
| 6 | 1076 | 2.05 | 1.45–2.89 | 0.000 | Fixed | 4.33, 0%, 0.50 | ||
| 5 | 799 | 1.78 | 1.22–2.60 | 0.003 | Fixed | 6.42, 38%, 0.17 | ||
| 4 | 799 | 2.80 | 1.75–4.49 | 0.000 | Fixed | 1.04, 0%, 0.79 | ||
| 1 | 96 | 0.57 | 0.22–1.49 | 0.253 | Fixed | - | ||
| 9 | 1159 | 2.03 | 1.31–3.16 | 0.002 | Random | 40.37, 80%, 0.000 | ||
| 2 | 241 | 2.97 | 0.19–47.15 | 0.44 | Random | 12.21, 92%, 0.0005 | ||
| 7 | 918 | 1.96 | 1.26–3.06 | 0.003 | Random | 27.12, 78%, 0.0001 | ||
| 4 | 638 | 2.76 | 1.81–4.20 | 0.001 | Fixed | 1.05, 0%, 0.79 | ||
| 1 | 82 | 2.33 | 0.99–5.43 | 0.05 | Fixed | - | ||
| 4 | 439 | 1.40 | 0.82–2.40 | 0.22 | Random | 15.33, 80%, 0.002 | ||
| 9 | 2528 | 1.69 | 1.47–1.95 | 0.000 | Fixed | 10.42, 23%, 0.24 | ||
| 1 | 103 | 1.58 | 0.56–4.47 | 0.38 | Fixed | - | ||
| 8 | 2425 | 1.69 | 1.47–1.95 | 0.000 | Fixed | 10.41, 33%, 0.17 | ||
| 3 | 695 | 2.86 | 1.16–7.02 | 0.02 | Random | 4.95, 60%, 0.08 | ||
| 1 | 192 | 3.46 | 1.22–9.80 | 0.01 | Fixed | - | ||
| 1 | 73 | 4.70 | 1.14–19.28 | 0.032 | Fixed | - | ||
| 5 | 1641 | 1.61 | 1.39–1.87 | 0.000 | Fixed | 0.73, 0%, 0.95 |
BCG: bacillus Calmette-Guerin; CSS: cancer-specific survival; Fixed: Fixed, Inverse Variance model; HR: hazard ratio; I2: I-squared; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; Random: Random, I-V heterogeneity model; RFS: recurrence-free survival; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; UBC: urothelial bladder cancer.
Fig 3The hazard ratio (HR) of Ki-67 expression associated with PFS in all bladder cancer patients.
Results of subgroup analysis of the association between Ki-67 expression and clinicopathological parameters.
| Outcome of interest | Studies (n) | Patients | OR | 95%CI | P value | Model | Heterogeneity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chi2, I2, P value | |||||||
| 2 | 293 | 1.02 | 0.41–2.54 | 0.97 | Random | 2.03, 51%, 0.15 | |
| 6 | 1551 | 1.09 | 0.83–1.43 | 0.55 | Fixed | 3.59, 0%, 0.61 | |
| Asian | 3 | 522 | 0.89 | 0.56–1.43 | 0.63 | Fixed | 1.75, 0%, 0.42 |
| Non-Asian | 3 | 1029 | 1.20 | 0.86–1.68 | 0.29 | Fixed | 0.87, 0%, 0.65 |
| 1 | 588 | 1.28 | 0.86–1.89 | 0.22 | Fixed | - | |
| 4 | 570 | 0.29 | 0.19–0.42 | 0.000 | Fixed | 3.20, 6%, 0.36 | |
| 3 | 1010 | 0.30 | 0.09–1.02 | 0.05 | Random | 12.97, 85%, 0.002 | |
| 6 | 897 | 0.43 | 0.20–0.90 | 0.02 | Random | 18.64, 73%, 0.002 | |
| 3 | 522 | 1.28 | 0.60–2.77 | 0.52 | Random | 6.28, 68%, 0.04 | |
| 4 | 686 | 1.80 | 1.26–2.56 | 0.001 | Fixed | 3.46, 13%, 0.33 |
Fixed: Fixed, Inverse Variance model; I2: I-squared; OR: odd ratio; Random: Random, I-V heterogeneity model.
Fig 4Funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias on RFS and PFS.
(A) Begg’s test was not significant intending no significant bias was observed on RFS. (B) Egger’s test was not significant intending no significant bias was observed on RFS. (C) It showed no publication bias on PFS in Begg’s test, (D) It showed no publication bias on PFS in Egger’s test.