Literature DB >> 27409563

Eye Movements of Radiologists Reflect Expertise in CT Study Interpretation: A Potential Tool to Measure Resident Development.

Raymond Bertram1, Johanna Kaakinen1, Frank Bensch1, Laura Helle1, Eila Lantto1, Pekka Niemi1, Nina Lundbom1.   

Abstract

Purpose To establish potential markers of visual expertise in eye movement (EM) patterns of early residents, advanced residents, and specialists who interpret abdominal computed tomography (CT) studies. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved use of anonymized CT studies as research materials and to obtain anonymized eye-tracking data from volunteers. Participants gave written informed consent. Early residents (n = 15), advanced residents (n = 14), and specialists (n = 12) viewed 26 abdominal CT studies as a sequence of images at either 3 or 5 frames per second while EMs were recorded. Data were analyzed by using linear mixed-effects models. Results Early residents' detection rate decreased with working hours (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73, 0.91; P = .001). They detected less of the low visual contrast (but not of the high visual contrast) lesions (45% [13 of 29]) than did specialists (62% [18 of 29]) (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.61; P < .001) or advanced residents (56% [16 of 29]) (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.93; P = .024). Specialists and advanced residents had longer fixation durations at 5 than at 3 frames per second (specialists: β = .01; 95% CI: .004, .026; P = .008; advanced residents: β = .04; 95% CI: .03, .05; P < .001). In the presence of lesions, saccade lengths of specialists shortened more than those of advanced (β = .02; 95% CI: .007, .04; P = .003) and of early residents (β = .02; 95% CI: .008, 0.04; P = .003). Irrespective of expertise, high detection rate correlated with greater reduction of saccade length in the presence of lesions (β = -.10; 95% CI: -.16, -.04; P = .002) and greater increase at higher presentation speed (β = .11; 95% CI: .04, .17; P = .001). Conclusion Expertise in CT reading is characterized by greater adaptivity in EM patterns in response to the demands of the task and environment. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27409563     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Implementation and initial experience with an interactive eye-tracking system for measuring radiologists' visual search in diagnostic tasks using volumetric CT images.

Authors:  Hao Gong; Scott S Hsieh; David R Holmes; David A Cook; Akitoshi Inoue; David J Bartlett; Francis Baffour; Hiroaki Takahashi; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Viewing patterns regarding panoramic radiographs with different pathological lesions: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Dorothea Vogel; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Characteristics of expert search behavior in volumetric medical image interpretation.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Ann J Carrigan; Megan Mills; William F Auffermann; Anina N Rich; Trafton Drew
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  Eye tracking: the silver bullet of competency assessment in medical image interpretation?

Authors:  Ellen M Kok
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-04

5.  Strategic Eye Movements are Used to Support Object Authentication.

Authors:  Jane E Raymond; Scott P Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Eye tracking in Educational Science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas.

Authors:  Jarodzka Halszka; Kenneth Holmqvist; Hans Gruber
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 0.957

Review 7.  Eye Movements in Medical Image Perception: A Selective Review of Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-20

8.  How massed practice improves visual expertise in reading panoramic radiographs in dental students: An eye tracking study.

Authors:  Juliane Richter; Katharina Scheiter; Thérése Felicitas Eder; Fabian Huettig; Constanze Keutel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Sage E P Boettcher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.