Literature DB >> 27408118

Magnetic Resonance Urography in Obstructive Uropathy.

K K Sen1, C Mohan2, B S Verma3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary obstruction is one of the few reversible causes of renal failure. Early diagnosis and treatment can salvage the kidney. Presently intravenous urography, ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are in vogue to detect the cause and demonstrate the site of obstruction.
METHODS: An evaluation of imaging technique in obstructive uropathy was undertaken in a group of 25 patients. RESULT AND
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance urography delivered highest accuracy amongst the techniques studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance urography

Year:  2011        PMID: 27408118      PMCID: PMC4921566          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(08)80060-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  7 in total

1.  Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  M Patlas; A Farkas; D Fisher; I Zaghal; I Hadas-Halpern
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Visualization of urinary tract dilatation: value of single-shot MR urography.

Authors:  G Reuther; B Kiefer; E Wandl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Patients at high risk for upper tract urothelial cancer: evaluation of hydronephrosis using high resolution magnetic resonance urography.

Authors:  R Chahal; K Taylor; I Eardley; S N Lloyd; J A Spencer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  MR urography of obstructive uropathy: diagnostic value of the method in selected clinical groups.

Authors:  J Zielonko; M Studniarek; M Markuszewski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  CT urography and MR urography.

Authors:  Akira Kawashima; James F Glockner; Bernard F King
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  MR imaging of renal function.

Authors:  Ambrose J Huang; Vivian S Lee; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.

Authors:  R C Smith; A T Rosenfield; K A Choe; K R Essenmacher; M Verga; M G Glickman; R C Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Value of Magnetic Resonance Urography Versus Computerized Tomography Urography (CTU) in Evaluation of Obstructive Uropathy: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Saeed M Bafaraj
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2018-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.