Literature DB >> 12664120

MR urography of obstructive uropathy: diagnostic value of the method in selected clinical groups.

J Zielonko1, M Studniarek, M Markuszewski.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of MR urography (MRU) in the diagnosis of obstructive uropathy in selected groups of patients. The groups involved following pathologies: calculi; strictures of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ); benign and malignancy-induced ureterostenosis. Sixty patients with clinical diagnosis of obstructive uropathy were subjected to static fluid MRU (sMRU) with the use of 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence in a 0.5-T magnet. The examination was completed with conventional MR sequences and in 12 cases additionally with sequences after the administration of Gd-DTPA and excretory MRU. The results were compared with intravenous urography (IVU), CT, US, clinical and histopathological data. The degree of the urinary tract dilatation as well as the level and type of obstruction were estimated. In patients with urolithiasis sMRU correctly depicted the degree of ureterohydronephrosis in 85%, in cases of UPJ stenosis and malignancy-induced ureterostenosis in 100% and in the group of benign ureterostenosis in 91% of patients. Determination of obstruction level in patients with stones was adequate in 92% and in cases of non-calculous ureteral strictures in 100% of patients. The sMRU sequence alone could not specify the nature of obstruction except 1 case of bladder carcinoma. Filling defects in ureters visible on MR urograms were verified with IVU or CT to exclude intrinsic tumours. Completed with conventional MR sequences sMRU enabled the depiction of solid mass or infiltration in 83% cases of malignancy-induced ureterostenosis, and in the remaining groups of patients neoplastic process was excluded in 91%. In conjunction with excretory MRU and conventional MR images sMRU appears to be a highly useful technique in assessment of obstructive uropathy, especially that of non-calculous origin. Among different clinical applications MRU is superior in the evaluation of dilated urinary tract in altered anatomical conditions (e.g. in patients with ileal neobladder).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12664120     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1550-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  7 in total

1.  Caveats when interpreting intravenous urograms following ileal orthotopic bladder substitution.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Urs E Studer; Stephan Madersbacher; Martin J Sonnenschein; Peter Vock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Functional and morphological MR imaging of the upper urinary tract in the pediatric age group].

Authors:  W K Rohrschneider; J-P Schenk
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Percutaneous nephrostomy: technical aspects and indications.

Authors:  Mandeep Dagli; Parvati Ramchandani
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Magnetic Resonance Urography in Obstructive Uropathy.

Authors:  K K Sen; C Mohan; B S Verma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 5.  [MR urography: principles, examination techniques, indications].

Authors:  M Memarsadeghi; M Riccabona; G Heinz-Peer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Pediatric MRU--its potential and its role in the diagnostic work-up of upper urinary tract dilatation in infants and children.

Authors:  Michael Riccabona
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Three-dimensional static-fluid MR urography with gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) at 3.0T: comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance with respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (FSE).

Authors:  Wei Wang; Junzhe Yang; Jing Liu; Wei Li; Kai Zhao; Ke Xue; Yongming Dai; Jianxing Qiu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.