Literature DB >> 27407100

Poor concordance between CA-125 and RECIST at the time of disease progression in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: analysis of the AURELIA trial.

K Lindemann1, G Kristensen2, M R Mirza3, L Davies4, F Hilpert5, I Romero6, A Ayhan7, A Burges8, M J Rubio9, F Raspagliesi10, M Huizing11, G-J Creemers12, M Lykka13, C K Lee4, V Gebski4, E Pujade-Lauraine14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on CA-125 as a predictor of disease progression (PD) in ovarian cancer come predominantly from patients with platinum-sensitive disease receiving chemotherapy alone. We assessed concordance between CA-125-defined and RECIST-defined PD using data from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) randomized phase III AURELIA trial in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PROC were randomized to receive single-agent chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. PD by CA-125 was defined according to GCIG criteria (except that confirmatory CA-125 measurement was not required). This exploratory analysis included patients with RECIST PD and a CA-125 reading ≤28 days before and ≤21 days after RECIST-defined PD.
RESULTS: Of 218 eligible patients, only 94 (43%, 95% confidence interval 36% to 50%) had concordant RECIST and CA-125 PD status (42% in the chemotherapy-alone arm; 45% in the bevacizumab combination arm, P = 0.6). There was no evidence of CA-125-defined PD in the remaining 124 patients despite PD according to imaging. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients with PD defined by both RECIST and CA-125 and those with RECIST-only PD. CA-125 was even less sensitive in detecting PD in patients with early (<8 weeks after randomization) compared with later RECIST-defined PD (69% versus 53%, respectively, not meeting CA-125 criteria; P = 0.053). There was no significant difference in survival after PD in patients with concordant PD by RECIST and CA-125 versus those with PD only by RECIST. We validated our findings in an independent study population of PROC.
CONCLUSIONS: In this platinum-resistant population, PD was typically detected earlier by imaging than by CA-125, irrespective of bevacizumab treatment. Disease status by CA-125 at the time of PD was not prognostic for overall survival. Regular radiologic assessment as well as symptom benefit assessment should be considered during PROC follow-up.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA-125; RECIST; ovarian cancer; platinum resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27407100     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  10 in total

Review 1.  Personalized and precision medicine: integrating genomics into treatment decisions in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Trang H Au; Kai Wang; David Stenehjem; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

2.  Utility of serum CA-125 monitoring in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Julia L Boland; Qin Zhou; Alexia E Iasonos; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Jason Konner; Margaret Callahan; Claire Friedman; Carol Aghajanian; Paul Sabbatini; Dmitriy Zamarin; Karen A Cadoo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Circulating Biomarkers for Therapeutic Monitoring of Anti-cancer Agents.

Authors:  Helena J Janse van Rensburg; Pavlina Spiliopoulou; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.837

4.  Is CA125 useful in monitoring patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer?

Authors:  G J S Rustin; M R Hall
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Birinapant sensitizes platinum-resistant carcinomas with high levels of cIAP to carboplatin therapy.

Authors:  V La; R Fujikawa; D M Janzen; M Nunez; L Bainvoll; L Hwang; K Faull; G Lawson; S Memarzadeh
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-04-03

6.  Tumor Size and Overall Survival in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab.

Authors:  Alexandre Sostelly; François Mercier
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2019-05-28

7.  Cell-free tumor DNA, CA125 and HE4 for the objective assessment of tumor burden in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Florian Heitz; Sotirios Lakis; Philipp Harter; Sebastian Heikaus; Jalid Sehouli; Jatin Talwar; Roopika Menon; Beyhan Ataseven; Miriam Bertrand; Stephanie Schneider; Erika Mariotti; Mareike Bommert; Judith N Müller; Sonia Prader; Frauke Leenders; Alexandra Hengsbach; Christian Gloeckner; Elena Ioana Braicu; Lukas C Heukamp; Andreas du Bois; Johannes M Heuckmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prognostic Impact of Circulating Methylated Homeobox A9 DNA in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Faaborg; Rikke Fredslund Andersen; Marianne Waldstrøm; Jon Røikjær Henriksen; Parvin Adimi; Anders Jakobsen; Karina Dahl Steffensen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Serum Metabolic Fingerprints on Bowl-Shaped Submicroreactor Chip for Chemotherapy Monitoring.

Authors:  Xia Yin; Jing Yang; Mengji Zhang; Xinyao Wang; Wei Xu; Cameron-Alexander H Price; Lin Huang; Wanshan Liu; Haiyang Su; Wenjing Wang; Hongyu Chen; Guangjin Hou; Mark Walker; Ying Zhou; Zhen Shen; Jian Liu; Kun Qian; Wen Di
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 10.  Current Standards and Recent Advances in Biomarkers of Major Endocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Yanhong Luo; Hua Zhu; Tao Tan; Jianfeng He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.810

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.