Literature DB >> 27404959

The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda" Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report.

Tyler W Barrett1, Kristin L Rising2, M Fernanda Bellolio3, M Kennedy Hall4, Aaron Brody5, Kenneth W Dodd6, Mira Grieser7, Phillip D Levy5, Ali S Raja8, Wesley H Self1, Gail Weingarten9, Erik P Hess3, Judd E Hollander2.   

Abstract

Diagnostic testing is an integral component of patient evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Emergency clinicians frequently use diagnostic testing to more confidently exclude "worst-case" diagnoses rather than to determine the most likely etiology for a presenting complaint. Increased utilization of diagnostic testing has not been associated with reductions in disease-related mortality but has led to increased overall healthcare costs and other unintended consequences (e.g., incidental findings requiring further workup, unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation or potentially nephrotoxic contrast). Shared decision making (SDM) presents an opportunity for clinicians to discuss the benefits and harms associated with diagnostic testing with patients to more closely tailor testing to patient risk. This article introduces the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating SDM into emergency care by summarizing the conclusions of the diagnostic testing group at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM. Three primary domains emerged: 1) characteristics of a condition or test appropriate for SDM, 2) critical elements of and potential barriers to SDM discussions on diagnostic testing, and 3) financial aspects of SDM applied to diagnostic testing. The most critical research questions to improve engagement of patients in their acute care diagnostic decisions were determined by consensus.
© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27404959      PMCID: PMC5145733          DOI: 10.1111/acem.13050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  46 in total

1.  Health literacy and functional health status among older adults.

Authors:  Michael S Wolf; Julie A Gazmararian; David W Baker
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-26

Review 2.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Communicating with patients who cannot read.

Authors:  B D Weiss; C Coyne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  "I'm Just a Patient": Fear and Uncertainty as Drivers of Emergency Department Use in Patients With Chronic Disease.

Authors:  Kristin L Rising; Anastasia Hudgins; Matthew Reigle; Judd E Hollander; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Emergency physician perceptions of shared decision-making.

Authors:  Hemal K Kanzaria; Robert H Brook; Marc A Probst; Dustin Harris; Sandra H Berry; Jerome R Hoffman
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; Meghan A Knoedler; Nilay D Shah; Jeffrey A Kline; Maggie Breslin; Megan E Branda; Laurie J Pencille; Brent R Asplin; David M Nestler; Annie T Sadosty; Ian G Stiell; Henry H Ting; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-04-10

7.  Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; John E Wennberg; France Legare; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Benjamin W Moulton; Karen R Sepucha; Andrea G Sodano; Jaime S King
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Return visits to the emergency department: the patient perspective.

Authors:  Kristin L Rising; Kevin A Padrez; Meghan O'Brien; Judd E Hollander; Brendan G Carr; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 9.  Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.

Authors:  Natalie Joseph-Williams; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-11-09

10.  Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards; Carl May
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  3 in total

1.  When less is more: mitigating the harms and risks of over-testing through shared decision making.

Authors:  Anthony Chauvin; Eddy Lang; Patrick Bossuyt
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.410

2.  Awareness and Knowledge of Ionizing Radiation Risks Between Prescribed and Self-Presenting Patients for Common Diagnostic Radiological Procedures in Bahrain.

Authors:  Adel Al-Mallah; Asokan G Vaithinathan; Mahdi Al-Sehlawi; Mariam Al-Mannai
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alex Waddell; Alyse Lennox; Gerri Spassova; Peter Bragge
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 7.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.