William I Fisher1, Rebecca C Thurston. 1. 1Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study provides the description, protocol, and results from a novel prospective ambulatory digital hot flash phenomenon diary. METHODS: This study included 152 midlife women with daily hot flashes who completed an ambulatory electronic hot flash diary continuously for the waking hours of three consecutive days. In this diary, women recorded their hot flashes and accompanying characteristics and associations as the hot flashes occurred. RESULTS: Self-reported hot flash severity on the digital diaries indicated that the majority of hot flashes were rated as mild (41.3%) or moderate (43.7%). Severe (13.1%) and very severe (1.8%) hot flashes were less common. Hot flash bother ratings were rated as mild (43%), or moderate (33.5%), with fewer hot flashes reported bothersome (17.5%) or very bothersome (6%). The majority of hot flashes were reported as occurring on the face (78.9%), neck (74.7%), and chest (61.3%). Of all reported hot flashes, 32% occurred concurrently with prickly skin, 7% with anxiety, and 5% with nausea. A novel finding from the study was that 38% of hot flashes were accompanied by a premonitory aura. CONCLUSIONS: A prospective electronic digital hot flash diary allows for a more precise quantitation of hot flashes while overcoming many of the limitations of commonly used retrospective questionnaires and paper diaries. Unique insights into the phenomenology, loci, and associated characteristics of hot flashes were obtained using this device. The digital hot flash phenomenology diary is recommended for future ambulatory studies of hot flashes as a prospective measure of the hot flash experience.
OBJECTIVE: This study provides the description, protocol, and results from a novel prospective ambulatory digital hot flash phenomenon diary. METHODS: This study included 152 midlife women with daily hot flashes who completed an ambulatory electronic hot flash diary continuously for the waking hours of three consecutive days. In this diary, women recorded their hot flashes and accompanying characteristics and associations as the hot flashes occurred. RESULTS: Self-reported hot flash severity on the digital diaries indicated that the majority of hot flashes were rated as mild (41.3%) or moderate (43.7%). Severe (13.1%) and very severe (1.8%) hot flashes were less common. Hot flash bother ratings were rated as mild (43%), or moderate (33.5%), with fewer hot flashes reported bothersome (17.5%) or very bothersome (6%). The majority of hot flashes were reported as occurring on the face (78.9%), neck (74.7%), and chest (61.3%). Of all reported hot flashes, 32% occurred concurrently with prickly skin, 7% with anxiety, and 5% with nausea. A novel finding from the study was that 38% of hot flashes were accompanied by a premonitory aura. CONCLUSIONS: A prospective electronic digital hot flash diary allows for a more precise quantitation of hot flashes while overcoming many of the limitations of commonly used retrospective questionnaires and paper diaries. Unique insights into the phenomenology, loci, and associated characteristics of hot flashes were obtained using this device. The digital hot flash phenomenology diary is recommended for future ambulatory studies of hot flashes as a prospective measure of the hot flash experience.
Authors: Ellen B Gold; Alicia Colvin; Nancy Avis; Joyce Bromberger; Gail A Greendale; Lynda Powell; Barbara Sternfeld; Karen Matthews Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Carolyn J Crandall; Ellen B Gold; Barbara Sternfeld; Hadine Joffe; Faith Selzer; Karen A Matthews Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Yuefang Chang; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; J Richard Jennings; Roland von Känel; Doug P Landsittel; Karen A Matthews Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.310