Rebecca C Thurston1, Yuefang Chang, Emma Barinas-Mitchell, J Richard Jennings, Roland von Känel, Doug P Landsittel, Karen A Matthews. 1. 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 2Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA 3Department of Neurosurgery 4Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 5Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hot flashes are experienced by most midlife women. Emerging data indicate that they may be associated with endothelial dysfunction. No studies have tested whether hot flashes are associated with endothelial function using physiologic measures of hot flashes. We tested whether physiologically assessed hot flashes were associated with poorer endothelial function. We also considered whether age modified associations. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-two nonsmoking women reporting either daily hot flashes or no hot flashes, aged 40 to 60 years, and free of clinical cardiovascular disease, underwent ambulatory physiologic hot flash and diary hot flash monitoring; a blood draw; and ultrasound measurement of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation to assess endothelial function. Associations between hot flashes and flow-mediated dilation were tested in linear regression models controlling for lumen diameter, demographics, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and estradiol. RESULTS: In multivariable models incorporating cardiovascular disease risk factors, significant interactions by age (P < 0.05) indicated that among the younger tertile of women in the sample (age 40-53 years), the presence of hot flashes (beta [standard error] = -2.07 [0.79], P = 0.01), and more frequent physiologic hot flashes (for each hot flash: beta [standard error] = -0.10 [0.05], P = 0.03, multivariable) were associated with lower flow-mediated dilation. Associations were not accounted for by estradiol. Associations were not observed among the older women (age 54-60 years) or for self-reported hot flash frequency, severity, or bother. Among the younger women, hot flashes explained more variance in flow-mediated dilation than standard cardiovascular disease risk factors or estradiol. CONCLUSIONS: Among younger midlife women, frequent hot flashes were associated with poorer endothelial function and may provide information about women's vascular status beyond cardiovascular disease risk factors and estradiol.
OBJECTIVE: Hot flashes are experienced by most midlife women. Emerging data indicate that they may be associated with endothelial dysfunction. No studies have tested whether hot flashes are associated with endothelial function using physiologic measures of hot flashes. We tested whether physiologically assessed hot flashes were associated with poorer endothelial function. We also considered whether age modified associations. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-two nonsmoking women reporting either daily hot flashes or no hot flashes, aged 40 to 60 years, and free of clinical cardiovascular disease, underwent ambulatory physiologic hot flash and diary hot flash monitoring; a blood draw; and ultrasound measurement of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation to assess endothelial function. Associations between hot flashes and flow-mediated dilation were tested in linear regression models controlling for lumen diameter, demographics, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and estradiol. RESULTS: In multivariable models incorporating cardiovascular disease risk factors, significant interactions by age (P < 0.05) indicated that among the younger tertile of women in the sample (age 40-53 years), the presence of hot flashes (beta [standard error] = -2.07 [0.79], P = 0.01), and more frequent physiologic hot flashes (for each hot flash: beta [standard error] = -0.10 [0.05], P = 0.03, multivariable) were associated with lower flow-mediated dilation. Associations were not accounted for by estradiol. Associations were not observed among the older women (age 54-60 years) or for self-reported hot flash frequency, severity, or bother. Among the younger women, hot flashes explained more variance in flow-mediated dilation than standard cardiovascular disease risk factors or estradiol. CONCLUSIONS: Among younger midlife women, frequent hot flashes were associated with poorer endothelial function and may provide information about women's vascular status beyond cardiovascular disease risk factors and estradiol.
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Mark A Black; Kyra E Pyke; Jaume Padilla; Greg Atkinson; Ryan A Harris; Beth Parker; Michael E Widlansky; Michael E Tschakovsky; Daniel J Green Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: John Deanfield; Ann Donald; Claudio Ferri; Cristina Giannattasio; Julian Halcox; Sean Halligan; Amir Lerman; Giuseppe Mancia; James J Oliver; Achille C Pessina; Damiano Rizzoni; Gian Paolo Rossi; Antonio Salvetti; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Stefano Taddei; David J Webb Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Ellen B Gold; Alicia Colvin; Nancy Avis; Joyce Bromberger; Gail A Greendale; Lynda Powell; Barbara Sternfeld; Karen Matthews Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Carolyn J Crandall; Ellen B Gold; Barbara Sternfeld; Hadine Joffe; Faith Selzer; Karen A Matthews Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Emily D Szmuilowicz; JoAnn E Manson; Jacques E Rossouw; Barbara V Howard; Karen L Margolis; Nancy C Greep; Robert G Brzyski; Marcia L Stefanick; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Chunyuan Wu; Matthew Allison; Diederick E Grobbee; Karen C Johnson; Judith K Ockene; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Gloria E Sarto; Mara Z Vitolins; Ellen W Seely Journal: Menopause Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Rachel P Wildman; Karen Matthews; Rebecca C Thurston; Joyce T Bromberger; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: M Caprio; M Infante; E Moriconi; A Armani; A Fabbri; G Mantovani; S Mariani; C Lubrano; E Poggiogalle; S Migliaccio; L M Donini; S Basciani; A Cignarelli; E Conte; G Ceccarini; F Bogazzi; L Cimino; R A Condorelli; S La Vignera; A E Calogero; A Gambineri; L Vignozzi; F Prodam; G Aimaretti; G Linsalata; S Buralli; F Monzani; A Aversa; R Vettor; F Santini; P Vitti; L Gnessi; U Pagotto; F Giorgino; A Colao; A Lenzi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Junmei Zhang; Chenxiao Tang; Patrick J Oberly; Margaret B Minnigh; Sharon L Achilles; Samuel M Poloyac Journal: Contraception Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Virginia M Miller; Juliana M Kling; Julia A Files; Michael J Joyner; Ekta Kapoor; Ann M Moyer; Walter A Rocca; Stephanie S Faubion Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ann M Moyer; Mariza de Andrade; Stephanie S Faubion; Ekta Kapoor; Tanda Dudenkov; Richard M Weinshilboum; Virginia M Miller Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.953