OBJECTIVE: With the rapid rise in the adoption of patient portals, many patients are gaining access to their personal health information online for the first time. The objective of this study was to examine specific usability barriers to patient portal engagement among a diverse group of patients and caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted interviews using performance testing and think-aloud methods with 23 patients and 2 caregivers as they first attempted to use features of a newly launched patient portal. RESULTS: In navigating the portal, participants experienced basic computer barriers (eg, difficulty using a mouse), routine computer barriers (eg, mistyping, navigation issues), reading/writing barriers, and medical content barriers. Compared to participants with adequate health literacy, participants with limited health literacy required 2 additional minutes to complete each task and were more likely to experience each type of navigational barrier. They also experienced more inaccuracies in interpreting a test result and finding a treatment plan within an after-visit summary. DISCUSSION: When using a patient portal for the first time, participants with limited health literacy completed fewer tasks unassisted, had a higher prevalence of encountering barriers, took longer to complete tasks, and had more problems accurately interpreting medical information. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a strong need for tailored and accessible training and support to assist all vulnerable patients and/or caregivers with portal registration and use. Measuring the health literacy of a patient population might serve as a strong proxy for identifying patients who need the most support in using health technologies.
OBJECTIVE: With the rapid rise in the adoption of patient portals, many patients are gaining access to their personal health information online for the first time. The objective of this study was to examine specific usability barriers to patient portal engagement among a diverse group of patients and caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted interviews using performance testing and think-aloud methods with 23 patients and 2 caregivers as they first attempted to use features of a newly launched patient portal. RESULTS: In navigating the portal, participants experienced basic computer barriers (eg, difficulty using a mouse), routine computer barriers (eg, mistyping, navigation issues), reading/writing barriers, and medical content barriers. Compared to participants with adequate health literacy, participants with limited health literacy required 2 additional minutes to complete each task and were more likely to experience each type of navigational barrier. They also experienced more inaccuracies in interpreting a test result and finding a treatment plan within an after-visit summary. DISCUSSION: When using a patient portal for the first time, participants with limited health literacy completed fewer tasks unassisted, had a higher prevalence of encountering barriers, took longer to complete tasks, and had more problems accurately interpreting medical information. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a strong need for tailored and accessible training and support to assist all vulnerable patients and/or caregivers with portal registration and use. Measuring the health literacy of a patient population might serve as a strong proxy for identifying patients who need the most support in using health technologies.
Authors: David A Haggstrom; Jason J Saleem; Alissa L Russ; Josette Jones; Scott A Russell; Neale R Chumbler Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sara J Czaja; Christina Zarcadoolas; Wendy L Vaughon; Chin Chin Lee; Maxine L Rockoff; Joslyn Levy Journal: Hum Factors Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Shireesha Dhanireddy; Jan Walker; Lisa Reisch; Natalia Oster; Thomas Delbanco; Joann G Elmore Journal: Health Expect Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Noa Segall; Jeffrey G Saville; Pete L'Engle; Boyd Carlson; Melanie C Wright; Kevin Schulman; James E Tcheng Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2011-10-22
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Nancy E Adler; Robert Nguyen; Andrea Lopez; Dean Schillinger Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2010
Authors: Dean Schillinger; Kevin Grumbach; John Piette; Frances Wang; Dennis Osmond; Carolyn Daher; Jorge Palacios; Gabriela Diaz Sullivan; Andrew B Bindman Journal: JAMA Date: 2002 Jul 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lina Tieu; Urmimala Sarkar; Dean Schillinger; James D Ralston; Neda Ratanawongsa; Rena Pasick; Courtney R Lyles Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Susan L Zickmund; Rachel Hess; Cindy L Bryce; Kathleen McTigue; Ellen Olshansky; Katharine Fitzgerald; Gary S Fischer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jane Y Zhao; Buer Song; Edwin Anand; Diane Schwartz; Mandip Panesar; Gretchen P Jackson; Peter L Elkin Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-04-16
Authors: Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Natalie C Benda; Drew Wright; David K Vawdrey; Jessica S Ancker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sarah S Nouri; Julia Adler-Milstein; Crishyashi Thao; Prasad Acharya; Jill Barr-Walker; Urmimala Sarkar; Courtney Lyles Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Andrea J Apter; A Russell Localio; Knashawn H Morales; Xiaoyan Han; Luzmercy Perez; Alyssa N Mullen; Marisa Rogers; Heather Klusaritz; John T Howell; Maryori N Canales; Tyra Bryant-Stephens Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Lina Tieu; Urmimala Sarkar; Stephen Kiyoi; Shobha Sadasivaiah; Mekhala Hoskote; Neda Ratanawongsa; Dean Schillinger Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2019 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Jennifer Elston Lafata; Carrie A Miller; Deirdre A Shires; Karen Dyer; Scott M Ratliff; Michelle Schreiber Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 2.229