Literature DB >> 27401452

A rapid magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging sequence for ultrasonic refocusing.

Charles Mougenot1, Samuel Pichardo, Steven Engler, Adam Waspe, Elodie Constanciel Colas, James M Drake.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance guided acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) is being used to correct for aberrations induced by tissue heterogeneities when using high intensity focusing ultrasound (HIFU). A compromise between published MR-ARFI adaptive solutions is proposed to achieve efficient refocusing of the ultrasound beam in under 10 min. In addition, an ARFI sequence based on an EPI gradient echo sequence was used to simultaneously monitor displacement and temperature with a large SNR and low distortion. This study was conducted inside an Achieva 3T clinical MRI using a Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU system to emit a 1 ms pulsed sonication with duty cycle of 2.3% at 300 Wac inside a polymer phantom. Virtual elements defined by a Hadamard array with sonication patterns composed of 6 phase steps were used to characterize 64 groups of 4 elements to find the optimal phase of the 256 elements of the transducer. The 384 sonication patterns were acquired in 580 s to identify the set of phases that maximize the displacement at the focal point. Three aberrators (neonatal skull, 8 year old skull and a checkered pattern) were added to each sonication pattern to evaluate the performance of this refocusing algorithm (n  =  4). These aberrators reduced the relative intensities to 95.3%, 69.6% and 25.5% for the neonatal skull, 8 year old skull, and checkered pattern virtual aberrators respectively. Using a 10 min refocusing algorithm, relative intensities of 101.6%, 91.3% and 93.3% were obtained. Better relative intensities of 103.9%, 94.3% and 101% were achieved using a 25 min refocusing algorithm. An average temperature increase of 4.2 °C per refocusing test was induced for the 10 min refocusing algorithm, resulting in a negligible thermal dose of 2 EM. A rapid refocusing of the beam can be achieved while keeping thermal effects to a minimum.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27401452     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/15/5724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Acoustic radiation force imaging using a single-shot spiral readout.

Authors:  Asaf Ilovitsh; Brett Z Fite; Tali Ilovitsh; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Simultaneous MR thermometry and acoustic radiation force imaging using interleaved acquisition.

Authors:  Joshua T de Bever; Henrik Odéen; Lorne W Hofstetter; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A reduced aperture allows for transcranial focus localization at lower pressure.

Authors:  M Anthony Phipps; Sumeeth Jonathan; Pai-Feng Yang; Li Min Chen; William Grissom; Charles F Caskey
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 4.  Production of acoustic radiation force using ultrasound: methods and applications.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.166

5.  Measurements of the Relationship Between CT Hounsfield Units and Acoustic Velocity and How It Changes With Photon Energy and Reconstruction Method.

Authors:  Taylor D Webb; Steven A Leung; Jarrett Rosenberg; Pejman Ghanouni; Jeremy J Dahl; Norbert J Pelc; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.725

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.